Maintenance for the week of April 13:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 13

So the conclusion to their discussion is this

Saltisol
Saltisol
✭✭✭✭
"we will not be enabling any additional events this weekend "

Additional ???
  • Taleof2Cities
    Taleof2Cities
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?

    Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?

    Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?

    It's in their official thread.
  • Shantu
    Shantu
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Sounds like you're just in a nitpicking, mean mood. "Additional" obviously means they won't be resuming the Undaunted festival this weekend. Not that hard to understand.
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    Shantu wrote: »
    Sounds like you're just in a nitpicking, mean mood. "Additional" obviously means they won't be resuming the Undaunted festival this weekend. Not that hard to understand.

    Yeah I do understand that, but is that what they been discussing to host the event or not ??
  • Taleof2Cities
    Taleof2Cities
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?

    Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?

    It's in their official thread.

    I read the official thread update.

    You decided that was the conclusion.
  • Gythral
    Gythral
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    it was:

    "Thank you for your patience"

    nothing more nothing less :open_mouth:
    “Be as a tower, that, firmly set,
    Shakes not its top for any blast that blows!”
    Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?

    Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?

    It's in their official thread.

    I read the official thread update.

    You decided that was the conclusion.

    Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    Gythral wrote: »
    it was:

    "Thank you for your patience"

    nothing more nothing less :open_mouth:

    So true !
  • Goregrinder
    Goregrinder
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?

    Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?

    It's in their official thread.

    I read the official thread update.

    You decided that was the conclusion.

    Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?

    I've learned over the years, to not jump to conclusions. I threw that mat out years ago.
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?

    Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?

    It's in their official thread.

    I read the official thread update.

    You decided that was the conclusion.

    Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?

    I've learned over the years, to not jump to conclusions. I threw that mat out years ago.

    So in other words you don't reflect and come to conclusions over what you are reading, then tell me what's the point in reading at all ?
  • SirAndy
    SirAndy
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    So the conclusion to their discussion is this

    There was a discussion? I must have missed that, all i saw was an announcement ...
    confused24.gif

  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    SirAndy wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    So the conclusion to their discussion is this

    There was a discussion? I must have missed that, all i saw was an announcement ...
    confused24.gif

    "We are still discussing next steps, and will let you know as soon as we have a plan"

    Previous post, same thread.
  • KingMagaw
    KingMagaw
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    SirAndy wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    So the conclusion to their discussion is this

    There was a discussion? I must have missed that, all i saw was an announcement ...
    confused24.gif

    I would assume ZOS discussion went like this:

    1bb8438.jpg
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    KingMagaw wrote: »
    SirAndy wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    So the conclusion to their discussion is this

    There was a discussion? I must have missed that, all i saw was an announcement ...
    confused24.gif

    I would assume ZOS discussion went like this:

    1bb8438.jpg

    LOL, I needed that :D
  • Ramber
    Ramber
    ✭✭✭✭
    remember when they swore the would never allow this to happen again.. just last year... they dont really have a test system they only have us.
  • Goregrinder
    Goregrinder
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?

    Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?

    It's in their official thread.

    I read the official thread update.

    You decided that was the conclusion.

    Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?

    I've learned over the years, to not jump to conclusions. I threw that mat out years ago.

    So in other words you don't reflect and come to conclusions over what you are reading, then tell me what's the point in reading at all ?

    To acquire information. I just don't formulate a thesis until I have collected all of the information. Also know as "jumping to conclusions".
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?

    Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?

    It's in their official thread.

    I read the official thread update.

    You decided that was the conclusion.

    Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?

    I've learned over the years, to not jump to conclusions. I threw that mat out years ago.

    So in other words you don't reflect and come to conclusions over what you are reading, then tell me what's the point in reading at all ?

    To acquire information. I just don't formulate a thesis until I have collected all of the information. Also know as "jumping to conclusions".

    Ok, I assume you've read the post we are discussing.
    "we will not be enabling any additional events this weekend" what would you call that if not a conclusion on how to handle the failed Undaunted event?
  • Ovcian
    Ovcian
    ✭✭
    BTW esologs are also RIP now :D
  • nickl413
    nickl413
    ✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Shantu wrote: »
    Sounds like you're just in a nitpicking, mean mood. "Additional" obviously means they won't be resuming the Undaunted festival this weekend. Not that hard to understand.

    Yeah I do understand that, but is that what they been discussing to host the event or not ??

    As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Find something constructive to do with your time.
    Edited by nickl413 on November 16, 2019 12:39AM
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    nickl413 wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Shantu wrote: »
    Sounds like you're just in a nitpicking, mean mood. "Additional" obviously means they won't be resuming the Undaunted festival this weekend. Not that hard to understand.

    Yeah I do understand that, but is that what they been discussing to host the event or not ??

    As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Get a life dude.

    That "get a life dude" is such a weak comment. It only shows that you have nothing to add.

    I post what i feel appropriate.
  • nickl413
    nickl413
    ✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    nickl413 wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Shantu wrote: »
    Sounds like you're just in a nitpicking, mean mood. "Additional" obviously means they won't be resuming the Undaunted festival this weekend. Not that hard to understand.

    Yeah I do understand that, but is that what they been discussing to host the event or not ??

    As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Get a life dude.

    That "get a life dude" is such a weak comment. It only shows that you have nothing to add.

    I post what i feel appropriate.

    Again, there was an entire paragraph there.
  • nickl413
    nickl413
    ✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    nickl413 wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Shantu wrote: »
    Sounds like you're just in a nitpicking, mean mood. "Additional" obviously means they won't be resuming the Undaunted festival this weekend. Not that hard to understand.

    Yeah I do understand that, but is that what they been discussing to host the event or not ??

    As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Get a life dude.

    That "get a life dude" is such a weak comment. It only shows that you have nothing to add.

    I post what i feel appropriate.

    You know what, you're right, it was inappropriate, I edited it.
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    nickl413 wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    nickl413 wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    Shantu wrote: »
    Sounds like you're just in a nitpicking, mean mood. "Additional" obviously means they won't be resuming the Undaunted festival this weekend. Not that hard to understand.

    Yeah I do understand that, but is that what they been discussing to host the event or not ??

    As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Get a life dude.

    That "get a life dude" is such a weak comment. It only shows that you have nothing to add.

    I post what i feel appropriate.

    You know what, you're right, it was inappropriate, I edited it.

    Hehehe and how are you spending your time ?
  • x48rph
    x48rph
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Saltisol wrote: »
    "we will not be enabling any additional events this weekend "

    Additional ???

    Just my speculation but they were probably considering turning on a different event among other options I'm sure they discussed to make everyone happy. I think they did the best thing possible though and just stopped it while they fixed it. This is much better than say last year when they just left it keep going while broken. This doesn't excuse the continued abysmal performace and lack of serious QA though
  • wavingblue
    wavingblue
    ✭✭✭✭
    Ramber wrote: »
    remember when they swore the would never allow this to happen again.. just last year... they dont really have a test system they only have us.

    Pepperidge Farms remembers.
  • Saltisol
    Saltisol
    ✭✭✭✭
    x48rph wrote: »
    Saltisol wrote: »
    "we will not be enabling any additional events this weekend "

    Additional ???

    Just my speculation but they were probably considering turning on a different event among other options I'm sure they discussed to make everyone happy. I think they did the best thing possible though and just stopped it while they fixed it. This is much better than say last year when they just left it keep going while broken. This doesn't excuse the continued abysmal performace and lack of serious QA though

    I agree that it was the best thing in that situation. I don't participate in those type of events so for me personally it's not an issue about the actual event.

    It's all about that they feed us empty words that don't change anything. I think the servers has to be upgraded to solve this but they aren't prepared to do that so they keep stalling it and act like they can solve it with some tweaks and QA.
Sign In or Register to comment.