Taleof2Cities wrote: »Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?
Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?
Taleof2Cities wrote: »Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?
Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?
It's in their official thread.
Taleof2Cities wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?
Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?
It's in their official thread.
I read the official thread update.
You decided that was the conclusion.
Taleof2Cities wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?
Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?
It's in their official thread.
I read the official thread update.
You decided that was the conclusion.
Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?
Goregrinder wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?
Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?
It's in their official thread.
I read the official thread update.
You decided that was the conclusion.
Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?
I've learned over the years, to not jump to conclusions. I threw that mat out years ago.
So the conclusion to their discussion is this
Goregrinder wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?
Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?
It's in their official thread.
I read the official thread update.
You decided that was the conclusion.
Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?
I've learned over the years, to not jump to conclusions. I threw that mat out years ago.
So in other words you don't reflect and come to conclusions over what you are reading, then tell me what's the point in reading at all ?
Goregrinder wrote: »Goregrinder wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »Taleof2Cities wrote: »Are you sure that’s the conclusion ... or just an assumption on your part?
Before you answer that ... you needed a new thread for an assumption on your part?
It's in their official thread.
I read the official thread update.
You decided that was the conclusion.
Who other then the reader interpret and comes to a conclusion ?
I've learned over the years, to not jump to conclusions. I threw that mat out years ago.
So in other words you don't reflect and come to conclusions over what you are reading, then tell me what's the point in reading at all ?
To acquire information. I just don't formulate a thesis until I have collected all of the information. Also know as "jumping to conclusions".
As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Get a life dude.
As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Get a life dude.
That "get a life dude" is such a weak comment. It only shows that you have nothing to add.
I post what i feel appropriate.
As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Get a life dude.
That "get a life dude" is such a weak comment. It only shows that you have nothing to add.
I post what i feel appropriate.
As someone pointed out, you are definitely in a nitpicking mood. You've fixated on half of a sentence out of a whole paragraph and made a thread centered around that. Couldnt you just post in one of the numerous ZOS bashing threads? And who cares if there was discussion on whether to bring it back or not? The only point you need to take away from it is that it's not coming back. And I'm sure that's not the ONLY thing they been discussing. Get a life dude.
That "get a life dude" is such a weak comment. It only shows that you have nothing to add.
I post what i feel appropriate.
You know what, you're right, it was inappropriate, I edited it.
"we will not be enabling any additional events this weekend "
Additional ???
"we will not be enabling any additional events this weekend "
Additional ???
Just my speculation but they were probably considering turning on a different event among other options I'm sure they discussed to make everyone happy. I think they did the best thing possible though and just stopped it while they fixed it. This is much better than say last year when they just left it keep going while broken. This doesn't excuse the continued abysmal performace and lack of serious QA though