Maintenance for the week of December 22:
• NA megaservers for maintenance – December 22, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 8:00AM EST (13:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for maintenance – December 22, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 8:00AM EST (13:00 UTC)

REPUTATION SYSTEM

  • Korah_Eaglecry
    Korah_Eaglecry
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Last week was P2W, this week is systems and mechanics that can be easily exploited for 500, Trebeck.
    Penniless Sellsword Company
    Captain Paramount - Jorrhaq Vhent
    Korith Eaglecry * Enrerion Aedihle * Laerinel Rhaev * Caius Berilius * Seylina Ithvala * H'Vak the Grimjawl
    Tenarei Rhaev * Dazsh Ro Khar * Yynril Rothvani * Bathes-In-Coin * Anaelle Faerniil * Azjani Ma'Les
    Aban Shahid Bakr * Kheshna gra-Gharbuk * Gallisten Bondurant * Etain Maquier * Atsu Kalame * Faulpia Severinus
    What is better, to be born good, or to overcome your evil nature through great effort? - Paarthurnax
  • JKorr
    JKorr
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    chrightt wrote: »
    Seriously a biased poll. This system just sounds like an incredibly biased system where if you have a group of friends or you’re a streamer you can simply lower some random’s reputation by a whole lot. Your unwillingness to provide an unbiased poll suggests that you yourself knows the negative consequences and unpopularity of your own suggestion while still desiring it for your own purposes.

    A hard no from me.

    You clearly read nothing. Thanks anyways for the "unbiased" opinion.... I literally have no idea what the *** you are referring to at all. Did I *** in your cereal? This is why we need a Reputation System.


    These comments serve a bigger purpose than you figured. It just helps my purpose as to why I think it's wise we get one.

    Relax. Christ. It's a thread, silly. On a game. To help us route out the people YOU guys *** about EVERYDAY. You got the option to comment and you didnt vote. I didnt get your support. Next.



    If there was a reputation system, going on the "wonderful" replies you've made in your multiple threads, I'd be avoiding the pointless biased poll making spamming troll who isn't in any way interested in discussion or debate, but continues to post bait on a public forum. Everyone else is supposed to relax, its a thread on a game, silly, except you, apparently. You get to be condescending and dismissive. Amazing how the devs provided and Ignore function, here on the forums and in the game.
  • kargen27
    kargen27
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    There is already a perfectly fine rating system in the game. If I don't like what a player is doing they go on my ignore list. It is a pass/fail system that every player can modify to meet their own needs.

    Beyond that it seems kind of pointless other than for role playing and if that is done correct you don't need a title to let the others know your reputation. The reputation can't be related to how we act in regards to the game. To much of the content is locked behind bad behavior from your character. My healer will kill things just because they are standing near a flower she wants.
    That leaves us with using it to judge how we act with other players. So if I send 15 people the materials they needed to finish a writ but also dropped the f-bomb in zone chat a few times where do I stand reputation wise? Do I get a bad reputation because I live in a rural area and during storms the power drops making it appear I bailed on a pledge? What keeps me from manipulating the system by doing good things with a few close guild mates so I can act like an a$$ to complete strangers and still get a decent reputation? If someone is trying to sell something way over market value in zone chat and I call them out on it is that a bad thing or a good thing? If I already have an inferno staff I get another and someone in the trial group needs it do I get punished if I keep it for a 2nd character? Do I get rewarded if I give it away? If I do get rewarded for giving it away doesn't the reputation system then rely on RNG?

    And the big question. If I have a reputation for never sharing my drops what keeps people that I form random groups with from kicking me in favor of someone who is likely to share drops? As you have said there would be no player input how does the game separate from a fake tank and a player new to tanking that just isn't good at it yet? What happens when the player actually trying to tank gets a bad reputation and nobody will group with him as a tank? If players can make decisions that affect other players based on a rating system that system will be abused.
    and then the parrot said, "must be the water mines green too."
  • Tandor
    Tandor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    You don't have to look any further than the biased, one-sided poll options to realise why this would be a bad idea. It would be abused by those who couldn't see beyond their own prejudices.
    Edited by Tandor on November 13, 2019 4:52PM
  • caperb
    caperb
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    caperb wrote: »
    A big NO. I'd rather not live in China with its censorship.

    Edit: where is the no in the poll?

    Irrelevant. Lol next

    Examples are not irrelevant. Next
  • Kel
    Kel
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yeah I notice all the friends share the same opinions and they are reptitive and say the same thing and its like nonsense .. but mostly everyone wants this by some degree

    And with this quote, we know this forum user is just here to troll.

    "Everyone want this" by 99% of us saying no.
    Not to mention this is supposed to fight toxicity but the OP's toxic responses to those that disagree speak volumes.

    Bad idea is bad.
    Bad troll is bad.

    Moving along. Nothing of value here...
  • Salix_alba
    Salix_alba
    ✭✭✭✭
    no

    also absolutly not voting in a poll with out a no

    also also *then not than
  • ItsMeToo
    ItsMeToo
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    "Wah Wahh Toxicity! Scams! Potatos! Dungeon Potatoes! Elitests! Idiot Groups and Idiots and Trolls and more Idiots! Bad idea you suck! Wahh! Im Getting My Friends Wahh"!

    (Thats what most of us sound like)


    If You Do Not Support This, Than Do Not Support This

    Everyone complaining about the person across from them. Alright? Fine. But if not, you can agree that we are atleast paranoid about who or what they are. Yeeaah there we gooo ;)

    Here is my suggestion and it is really quite simple. It's just a matter of actually creating this system as a Developer with, obviously, some modifications and their own personal features

    Earn or Lose Points based on your group/player activity and actions in game.

    Grants players a better understanding of who they play with, socialize and interact with and (maybe) who they are trading.

    Offers rewards and titles, new achievements, and more interesting junk based on your points/reputation.

    Players will have a symbol alongside there name based on there Reputation Rank. Are they Goodhearted? A Troll? Charitable? Evil? Theives? How about a bit of both?


    This is an MMORPG. An open world concept of online gameplay. It's time to start making Titles and Ranks that actually mean something for the Community - everyone. Not divided mission accomplishers. This is a crucial, daily and consistent concern that has significantly impacted our community. Our little society needs a bit more "security".

    It's time that you ACCEPT the fact that you can not filter out every scammer, every troll or every clown or loser you may dislike. You can not control other player behaviour but they control their own just like you.

    It's time to OWN it. Own what you are. Don't like it? Do some community work, make me like you again :D

    I can not support something that doesn't know the difference between then and than.
    FYI - There is no such thing as 'night capping' in a world wide MMO.
    FYI - There was no paid Beta. When they launched the game the Beta was over, even if you don't think it was.
    FYI - It's B2P not F2P. There is a difference.
    FYI - It doesn't take any player skill to mash keys or buttons in this game. The ones that stay alive longer have the better internet connection and speed.
    FYI - The game is not broken, it still works. It just has 'bugs' that need to be fixed.
    Balance is a "Bad" thing.

    Example: There were hundreds of Jedi and only two Sith in Star Wars. The Jedi wanted, "Balance in the Force" and they got it. Now there are only two Jedi and two Sith.

    Balance is a "Bad" thing.
    Is the glass half full or half empty?
    I say, "Get a smaller glass."
  • Sarannah
    Sarannah
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Awesome. How rude and "unbiased" of you guys. I feel so welcome in this community that I have been in for ever and have never EVER been insulted or treated badly until 5 years later when I joined the forum.



    You are nothing. You have no idea who you are speaking to. Pft. And neither do I. You get carried away like a perfect ***. I am done with you, you're a perfect stereotype. A+ to all of you for getting under my skin and antagonizing me.


    Keep bumping my posts. I got plans lol :disappointed:
    Not trying to antagonize or insult anyone. Sorry you feel that way. And I hope you can see I did not call your poll biased specifically. Although you can probably agree that without a "No" it does seem biased.

    Thing is, sometimes ideas are just bad. Mostly because a person forgot about something. In this case, the forms of abuse that would come with such a system.

    Do not take these replies personally. Just because an idea is found to be bad, it does not mean players are trying to be mean. I've posted bad ideas in the past, on other games, and it does feel bad when you are shot down. Don't let it get to you. For all you know, your next idea(s) may have an expansion based upon it. That is the thing with ideas, they can go either way.

    Just game on, and have fun in game!
    Edited by Sarannah on November 13, 2019 5:08PM
  • xenowarrior92eb17_ESO
    xenowarrior92eb17_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    hell yeah id love this!
  • Skwor
    Skwor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    No. This smacks of bringing politics and fascism into the game. Terrible to even consider
  • srfrogg23
    srfrogg23
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    srfrogg23 wrote: »
    Yeah I notice all the friends share the same opinions and they are reptitive and say the same thing and its like nonsense .. but mostly everyone wants this by some degree

    Why did you post your poll if you weren't ready to debate your ideas. Don't propose massively controversial changes to major aspects of the game if you're not ready for people to tell you why they think it's a bad idea.

    As a matter of record: not including a "no" response in your polls is a very biased approach. It literally defeats the purpose of a poll. No, it is not the same as "no response", which could mean that people simply never clicked on your thread and have no idea what you're poll is about.

    This isn't a debate. Bring up a rebuttle? Quit trolling? This is how I deal with people who antagonize me :D Not how I discuss things. You havent tried to discuss the matter with me!?! :D

    You've just been bitter and rude the whole way thru. Goodbye :D

    Why are you saying goodbye? Am I going somewhere? Do you have a victim complex or something?

    People disagreed, said your idea was bad. You insisted on defending it. And now, you're calling people trolls for continuing the conversation.

    I really don't think you understand how forums work. You're not in charge and your word is not law.

    If you want objective data, then you need to stop telling people that you think you're right. It's just an argument with voting buttons at that point.
  • CaffeinatedMayhem
    CaffeinatedMayhem
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭
    5Mbxgby.gif


    NO
    Edited by CaffeinatedMayhem on November 13, 2019 5:30PM
  • DBZVelena
    DBZVelena
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    I suggest we don't do this.
    Because its potential for abuse is great. In fact its enormous.
    What are Natch Potes? Can you eat those?
    I believe in Genie-Gina.
  • ArchMikem
    ArchMikem
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    The basic initial idea has its merits, so its not inherently a terrible idea.

    But then i saw some of the OP's latter replies, and this kind of idea should never be spearheaded by that kind of attitude.
    CP2,100 Master Explorer - AvA Two Star Warlord - Console Peasant - Khajiiti Aficionado - The Clan
    Quest Objective: OMG Go Talk To That Kitty!
  • ZOS_Ragnar
    ZOS_Ragnar
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    We have closed this thread as it has not been able to remain civil. Please ensure your future posts remain respectful at all times. Remember that resorting to personal insults is never okay.
    The Elder Scrolls Online - ZeniMax Online Studios
    Forum Rules | Code of Conduct | Terms of Service | Home Page | Help Site
    Staff Post
This discussion has been closed.