Maintenance for the week of December 15:
· [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] PC/Mac: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] Xbox: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] PlayStation®: NA and EU megaservers for maintenance – December 15, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
Magma Shell NEEDS A BUFF!
-
Urzigurumash✭✭✭✭✭
✭I love ferocious leap dont get me wrong, but I want to use a ultimate where I can brawl and take you out and magma shell can be that ultimate if it was reworked.
Or just add Spell Pen to Corrosive, rather than depriving PvE Tanks of a very useful tool.
It wouldn't affect StamDKs one iota other than making a few mag skills a touch more powerful in limited circumstances.
In my view MagDK has always been more offensively capabale than StamDK, so who cares if the signature StamDK morph is also useful for MagDK offense.
Xbox NA AD / Day 1 ScrubDK / Wood Orc Cuisine Enthusiast1 -
regime211✭✭✭✭✭
✭Magma shell should have increased flame damage the longer an enemy is within proximity while the ultimate is up. I understand that PVE tanks say they use this ultimate. But the flame damage needs to be drastically increased!0 -
regime211✭✭✭✭✭
✭Urzigurumash wrote: »I love ferocious leap dont get me wrong, but I want to use a ultimate where I can brawl and take you out and magma shell can be that ultimate if it was reworked.
Or just add Spell Pen to Corrosive, rather than depriving PvE Tanks of a very useful tool.
It wouldn't affect StamDKs one iota other than making a few mag skills a touch more powerful in limited circumstances.
In my view MagDK has always been more offensively capabale than StamDK, so who cares if the signature StamDK morph is also useful for MagDK offense.
Stam Dk does poison damage, magicka Dragonknight are based in flame why make corrosive only for pvp/DPS? Magma shell should be it.0 -
Urzigurumash✭✭✭✭✭
✭@regime211
Maybe you answered this already or maybe you're on console and don't know yet, but have you noticed the removal of the cooldown from the Combustion passive providing you greater sustain when Magma Shell is up? I only mean to say that maybe this Ult is now better than it was before. Maybe this change to Combustion is hardly noticeable also.Xbox NA AD / Day 1 ScrubDK / Wood Orc Cuisine Enthusiast0 -
Urzigurumash✭✭✭✭✭
✭Stam Dk does poison damage, magicka Dragonknight are based in flame why make corrosive only for pvp/DPS? Magma shell should be it.
Welcome to being like a StamDK where the vast majority of your skills do the wrong type of damage.. if my suggested change were made that is.
It may be that adding offensive power to this skill for MagDKs while retaining its defensive usefulness for Tanks would overload the skill for MagDKs in PvP. Would you be ok with a substantially increased cost?
Xbox NA AD / Day 1 ScrubDK / Wood Orc Cuisine Enthusiast0 -
Urzigurumash✭✭✭✭✭
✭Also, note both morphs of Banner do Flame Damage. A separate issue I know but it's not like MagDKs are starved for good ults.Xbox NA AD / Day 1 ScrubDK / Wood Orc Cuisine Enthusiast0 -
regime211✭✭✭✭✭
✭Urzigurumash wrote: »Stam Dk does poison damage, magicka Dragonknight are based in flame why make corrosive only for pvp/DPS? Magma shell should be it.
Welcome to being like a StamDK where the vast majority of your skills do the wrong type of damage.. if my suggested change were made that is.
It may be that adding offensive power to this skill for MagDKs while retaining its defensive usefulness for Tanks would overload the skill for MagDKs in PvP. Would you be ok with a substantially increased cost?
Yep I rather it cost 250 if it means I can use it as a offensive ultimate.0 -
regime211✭✭✭✭✭
✭Urzigurumash wrote: »@regime211
Maybe you answered this already or maybe you're on console and don't know yet, but have you noticed the removal of the cooldown from the Combustion passive providing you greater sustain when Magma Shell is up? I only mean to say that maybe this Ult is now better than it was before. Maybe this change to Combustion is hardly noticeable also.
Yeah I'm on console.0 -
idk✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Urzigurumash wrote: »Stam Dk does poison damage, magicka Dragonknight are based in flame why make corrosive only for pvp/DPS? Magma shell should be it.
Welcome to being like a StamDK where the vast majority of your skills do the wrong type of damage.. if my suggested change were made that is.
It may be that adding offensive power to this skill for MagDKs while retaining its defensive usefulness for Tanks would overload the skill for MagDKs in PvP. Would you be ok with a substantially increased cost?
Yep I rather it cost 250 if it means I can use it as a offensive ultimate.
But are you willing to give up the significant damage reduction to get a more offensive ultimate? While you did say you are wiling to give up the shield it provides others which is really not giving up anything for you with an ultimate that provides you a huge damage reduction. It is so easy to suggest such a strong defensive ultimate do more damage but much harder to increase ones personal risk.
Regardless, the idea seems to have such limited interest anyhow. Four days and still on the second page with many of the same people posting does not bode well for showing interest in the idea.2 -
MyPrist✭✭✭I take magma to protect me and my party in dunguans, if it will be a little longer it will be cool. Even if shield for party will be longer.0