JumpmanLane wrote: »They should fire some people. Start from scratch...
Enemy-of-Coldharbour wrote: »Quote:
"To be clear, our goal is for every class to be viable, not necessarily optimal, in any role without heavily relying on non-class skill lines."
And that is the problem. IMO every class should not be viable at every role. You just end up watering-down the class. I believe each class should be better at certain roles than other classes. That's what what makes each class unique.
Except then you get the Magdens who can’t do damage, the Magplars relegated to healing duties only (again in the damage front) StamDKs who can only be tanks...etc
It appears that that is exactly what some people around here want. Something I've begun to realize is that somehow the concepts of class and role have become one and the same in the minds of many people, and that somehow class identity has everything to do with being a tank or a DPS or healer.
GlorphNoldorin wrote: »When you don’t have a clue, you make deadline targets never ending (we are currently investigating, formulating, working on...... blah blah bla) and spurt out rambling justifications.
And hope everyone buys it while you ‘kill it’ all the way to the crown store
Enemy-of-Coldharbour wrote: »Quote:
"To be clear, our goal is for every class to be viable, not necessarily optimal, in any role without heavily relying on non-class skill lines."
And that is the problem. IMO every class should not be viable at every role. You just end up watering-down the class. I believe each class should be better at certain roles than other classes. That's what what makes each class unique.