I think they should just make the game buy to play, so there wouldn't be a mandatory sub. But they could add a voluntary sub, giving you extra credits like crowns for the to-be-implemented crown store, additional inventory space, additional options for outfit stations (like dying costumes) etc. That would be fair.

UrQuan wrote: »

Guys, this poll was not about an ESO+ subscription. This poll pre-dates ESO+ subscriptions. This poll is about the subscription that was required just to play the base game.

I voted with my wallet back then. I did a 3 month sub after the 1 month included with pre-order, finished the game content, and then walked until Tamriel Unlimited. $15/mo to repeat content isn't something I'm interested in for any game.

Now with only a paid chapter and 1 narrative DLC each year, DLC access doesn't even add significant value to a sub.

No, what would be best if Subscriptions were REQUIRED for PVP play and to post here in the Forum. The Nerf threads would suddenly end. Yeeesssss..... LOL

With the long lasting performance issues getting worse, not better, I think it is absolutely fair to want a lower price sub. Many don't feel there is as much value in the performance quality of the current product. Doesn't mean that people should just walk away and stop playing something they enjoy either. That is a choice each player gets to make on their own. Just saying if we are to compair it's market value on this area to competitors, it falls short.