rotaugen454 wrote: »Yeah, Yakko and Wakko are quite upset.
redspecter23 wrote: »Players: Hey ZOS, any chance you can try buffing stuff from time to time instead of nerfing constantly?
Also Players: Hey ZOS, can you revert this buff you just gave me. I don't like it. I won't give any logical reason why. Just trust me, K?
when evaluating the credibility of a forum post, it is important to consider the credentials of the author of said post.
The OP is small-scale pvp'er, slaying many with few. A credential not shared by many who have responded to his post.
I therefore give high credence to his words, even if few in length they may be. The message, while simple, is no less important.
The responses mocking his message however, are nothing more than verbal diarrhea drenched in a stench filled ignorance only simpletons could endure.
there is iron in his words of death for all comanche to see. and so there is iron in his words of life.
let it be life.
when evaluating the credibility of a forum post, it is important to consider the credentials of the author of said post.
The OP is small-scale pvp'er, slaying many with few. A credential not shared by many who have responded to his post.
I therefore give high credence to his words, even if few in length they may be. The message, while simple, is no less important.
The responses mocking his message however, are nothing more than verbal diarrhea drenched in a stench filled ignorance only simpletons could endure.
there is iron in his words of death for all comanche to see. and so there is iron in his words of life.
let it be life.
when evaluating the credibility of a forum post, it is important to consider the credentials of the author of said post.
The OP is small-scale pvp'er, slaying many with few. A credential not shared by many who have responded to his post.
I therefore give high credence to his words, even if few in length they may be. The message, while simple, is no less important.
The responses mocking his message however, are nothing more than verbal diarrhea drenched in a stench filled ignorance only simpletons could endure.
there is iron in his words of death for all comanche to see. and so there is iron in his words of life.
let it be life.
when evaluating the credibility of a forum post, it is important to consider the credentials of the author of said post.
The OP is small-scale pvp'er, slaying many with few. A credential not shared by many who have responded to his post.
I therefore give high credence to his words, even if few in length they may be. The message, while simple, is no less important.
The responses mocking his message however, are nothing more than verbal diarrhea drenched in a stench filled ignorance only simpletons could endure.
there is iron in his words of death for all comanche to see. and so there is iron in his words of life.
let it be life.
Credentials are never a substitute for reason. It is an appeal to authority which is still a logical fallacy regardless of the authority's expertise. The expert is still required to present the reason for thier opinion.
Getting killed by groups of enemies in PvP is reason enough.The amount of arguments you provide to support your case is staggering.

when evaluating the credibility of a forum post, it is important to consider the credentials of the author of said post.
The OP is small-scale pvp'er, slaying many with few. A credential not shared by many who have responded to his post.
I therefore give high credence to his words, even if few in length they may be. The message, while simple, is no less important.
The responses mocking his message however, are nothing more than verbal diarrhea drenched in a stench filled ignorance only simpletons could endure.
there is iron in his words of death for all comanche to see. and so there is iron in his words of life.
let it be life.