Has anyone tried Ryzen 3 gen CPUs yet for playing ESO ?

Lisutaris · August 2019

mrpaxman wrote: »

@Lisutaris
Awesome. Thanks for the spec numbers. That CPU and also the ram combo is exactly what i am looking at the most. Pairing that with my current Vega64 Strix. It definitely looks like my FPS will be close to double in ESO compared to what i have now.

NP, you are welcome.

RouDeR · August 2019

Lisutaris wrote: »

RouDeR wrote: »

mrpaxman wrote: »

@Lisutaris
Awesome. Thanks for the spec numbers. That CPU and also the ram combo is exactly what i am looking at the most. Pairing that with my current Vega64 Strix. It definitely looks like my FPS will be close to double in ESO compared to what i have now.

Here is the best value combo for ryzen 3600, long story short - it works perfectly fine with 70$ A320 motherboard paired with 3600 mhz ram without any issues of boosting it clock speeds to 4.2 ghz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF8EuEfKH3Q

don't care... why should I buy other stuff xD I am perfectly fine with my B450 Pro Carbon and NOT OC to the max... Why the hell should I do that O.O?
EDIT: I can also drive my car with 200 KM/h... but NOPE... I don't want 20l per 100 kilometres. Same with PC specs... voltage settings and Watts are not to ignore!
EDIT2: Your comment is also offtopic. ... Like 80% of the infos in this thread.

i was not referencing this quote to you, but @mrpaxman

On the topic of the OC ryzen 3 gen chips, it is nearly impossible to achieve anything beyond the advertised speeds, they are really bad overclockers, because they are already pushed nearly to the chip limits out of the box.

On the topic of the Power consumption, my i7 at 5.1 ghz is consuming barely 40-70wats in gaming depending of the usage. In synthetic benchmarks and stress tests the consumption is around 90-105 wats, which is literally nothing considering my GTX 1080ti is consuming 250Wats just because it can

Lisutaris · August 2019

mrpaxman wrote: »

@Lisutaris
Awesome. Thanks for the spec numbers. That CPU and also the ram combo is exactly what i am looking at the most. Pairing that with my current Vega64 Strix. It definitely looks like my FPS will be close to double in ESO compared to what i have now.

Np, you are welcome

Have fun with the setup. IMHO it's worth every $ / €.

Lisutaris · August 2019

RouDeR wrote: »

Lisutaris wrote: »

RouDeR wrote: »

mrpaxman wrote: »

@Lisutaris
Awesome. Thanks for the spec numbers. That CPU and also the ram combo is exactly what i am looking at the most. Pairing that with my current Vega64 Strix. It definitely looks like my FPS will be close to double in ESO compared to what i have now.

Here is the best value combo for ryzen 3600, long story short - it works perfectly fine with 70$ A320 motherboard paired with 3600 mhz ram without any issues of boosting it clock speeds to 4.2 ghz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF8EuEfKH3Q

don't care... why should I buy other stuff xD I am perfectly fine with my B450 Pro Carbon and NOT OC to the max... Why the hell should I do that O.O?
EDIT: I can also drive my car with 200 KM/h... but NOPE... I don't want 20l per 100 kilometres. Same with PC specs... voltage settings and Watts are not to ignore!
EDIT2: Your comment is also offtopic. ... Like 80% of the infos in this thread.

i was not referencing this quote to you, but @mrpaxman

On the topic of the OC ryzen 3 gen chips, it is nearly impossible to achieve anything beyond the advertised speeds, they are really bad overclockers, because they are already pushed nearly to the chip limits out of the box.

On the topic of the Power consumption, my i7 at 5.1 ghz is consuming barely 40-70wats in gaming depending of the usage. In synthetic benchmarks and stress tests the consumption is around 90-105 wats, which is literally nothing considering my GTX 1080ti is consuming 250Wats just because it can

oopsie, yea you are right. Now it makes sense

Sry for that.

mrpaxman · August 2019

RouDeR wrote: »

@MLGProPlayer @mrpaxman

The faster ram is contributing for the better/higher CPU usage, especially with the latest Windows 1903 build where they significantly improved the Windows task Scheduler in terms of multicore usage optimization.

For example with 2133 mhz ram , my CPU usage in ESO is around 25-30%, with 3000 mhz ram around 35-40%
with 3733 mhz around 45-70% and goes up to 100% in massive battles.

Here are results from Witcher 3 testing, where the game is already perfectly optimized (here ram speed has almost no impact)

2133 mhz
480p Lowest settings: 197-198 fps
1080p Ultra: 114-115 fps (GPU bound)
1440p Ultra: 86-87 fps (GPU bound)

3000 mhz
480p Lowest settings: 202-203 fps
1080p Ultra: 119-120 fps (GPU bound)
1440p Ultra: 88-89 fps (GPU bound)

3600 mhz
480p Lowest settings: 210-211 fps
1080p Ultra: 118-119 (GPU bound)
1440p Ultra: 88-89 fps (GPU bound)

Ok. So this has only been since Windows version 1903. That is pretty cool. I guess i will have to try squeeze another 100mhz out of my ram. Any improvement will be great for me haha

mrpaxman · August 2019

@RouDeR yeah. Under load seems to very similar between all CPU's sold. I just see a massive difference over what my meter is reading compared to Ryzen outside of gaming. The difference of what i would spend in electricity. In my case that is a lot of hours each day My PC is left at idle for many hours a day or under very low load. For others that may be almost no difference at all. I use just over 1000 watts while sim racing

but that is only a few hours each week of races. 600+ watts currently while in ESO. 800w+ in other games. Different CPU wattage's while gaming makes no real difference in my own case. To small of a change to matter for me is all

srfrogg23 · August 2019

I don't have a Ryzen, but if it is better than an i5-4690, then you shouldn't have any issues. Texture loading is slow but I can play on high settings with minimal issues.