Welcome to every single gaming board ever, where people will either never be satisfied with anything, or will blow even the tiniest issue out of proportion.
No wonder why devs hardly communicate with players in boards like this.
And no, I'm not saying you shouldn't voice your concerns or feedback about issues you're having with the game, but you just come up raging like a kid throwing a tantrum, don't be surprised if your topic is ignored and your complaint is not taken seriously. Also don't expect they'll change something, just because you, or a vocal minority that thinks they're the majority, just because they're making a loud, disagrees with it.
Night_Wolf2112 wrote: »Exactly this! They all spiral, and ZoS Devs and Reps don't ever show up to communicate any at all! Therefore, they are all non-constructive!! Unless we "need" something nerfed!
GeorgeBlack wrote: »Social media rage.
I dont mind rant topics. I just dont comment there.
But topics related to game features with start going down hill from the very first reply. Why? Social media rage. People have to prove others worse than themselves while annononimous.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmjYJy5CIM4 Welcome to every single gaming board ever, where people will either never be satisfied with anything, or will blow even the tiniest issue out of proportion.
No wonder why devs hardly communicate with players in boards like this.
And no, I'm not saying you shouldn't voice your concerns or feedback about issues you're having with the game, but you just come up raging like a kid throwing a tantrum, don't be surprised if your topic is ignored and your complaint is not taken seriously. Also don't expect they'll change something, just because you, or a vocal minority that thinks they're the majority, just because they're making a loud, disagrees with it.
@Eraldus Well, this isn't about one of your average PvP mimimi thread. This is about a 89 page forum thread with more than 149 supporting awesomes/agrees being closed for being "non-constructive" when it in fact has been constructive consistently. That thread wasn't a tantrum being thrown. This one is, because always trying to be nice is non-constructive and spiraling apparently.
Night_Wolf2112 wrote: »Exactly this! They all spiral, and ZoS Devs and Reps don't ever show up to communicate any at all! Therefore, they are all non-constructive!! Unless we "need" something nerfed!
Not any at all?Night_Wolf2112 wrote: »Exactly this! They all spiral, and ZoS Devs and Reps don't ever show up to communicate any at all! Therefore, they are all non-constructive!! Unless we "need" something nerfed!
I know, I was just messing.
The vast majority of this is discussion about news. Where are the discussions about bugs, like the stam necromancer being borked to hell and back ? What about the state of the game and known bugs ? Comments about feedback provided during the public test phases, or beyond ?
Patting yourself in the back publicly isn't communication.
I know, I was just messing.
The vast majority of this is discussion about news. Where are the discussions about bugs, like the stam necromancer being borked to hell and back ? What about the state of the game and known bugs ? Comments about feedback provided during the public test phases, or beyond ?
Patting yourself in the back publicly isn't communication.
There have been threads on their communication issues since launch though, I don't know why people keep expecting a sudden change from night to day in the way ZOS engages with people on the forums.
There have been points where it's better and it's better than it's been in the past, but the expectation that devs are going to sit on the forums answering in every thread isn't one which is going to be met, at least I don't see it happening.
I don't want to be negative and cynical but it's not going to change, and yet people still think more and more ranting about it will change that. ZOS' communication levels are what ZOS has chosen, we can encourage more, but if we keep expecting the unrealistic and then being mad when we don't get it then we're always going to be unhappy.
There have been threads on their communication issues since launch though, I don't know why people keep expecting a sudden change from night to day in the way ZOS engages with people on the forums.
the expectation that devs are going to sit on the forums answering in every thread isn't one which is going to be met, at least I don't see it happening.
This was in regard to the Bosmer racial traits right? I'll admit I didn't dive too deep into the thread to know specifics, but from my understanding ZOS stated they were done with the racial balance and there wouldn't be changes.I know, I was just messing.
The vast majority of this is discussion about news. Where are the discussions about bugs, like the stam necromancer being borked to hell and back ? What about the state of the game and known bugs ? Comments about feedback provided during the public test phases, or beyond ?
Patting yourself in the back publicly isn't communication.
There have been threads on their communication issues since launch though, I don't know why people keep expecting a sudden change from night to day in the way ZOS engages with people on the forums.
There have been points where it's better and it's better than it's been in the past, but the expectation that devs are going to sit on the forums answering in every thread isn't one which is going to be met, at least I don't see it happening.
I don't want to be negative and cynical but it's not going to change, and yet people still think more and more ranting about it will change that. ZOS' communication levels are what ZOS has chosen, we can encourage more, but if we keep expecting the unrealistic and then being mad when we don't get it then we're always going to be unhappy.
89 pages, even if they did not respond to the thread on these forums, you would have thought the topic would have been at least addressed somewhere else. ESO live perhaps, or even that reddit ama where the question was brought up three or four times, (yet apparently avoided).
It was even asked of them directly at pax east, and so far all they did was punt it.
HowTaoBrownCow wrote: »I am honestly mystified as to why they closed the Bosmer stealth nerf thread. I've rarely seen a thread as relatively calm and reasoned about a subject that bothered the thread participants as much as the stealth nerf does. It's hard to read the closure as anything more than, "We don't want to hear about this anymore. Shut up and go away.", and that's profoundly disappointing.
This was in regard to the Bosmer racial traits right? I'll admit I didn't dive too deep into the thread to know specifics, but from my understanding ZOS stated they were done with the racial balance and there wouldn't be changes.I know, I was just messing.
The vast majority of this is discussion about news. Where are the discussions about bugs, like the stam necromancer being borked to hell and back ? What about the state of the game and known bugs ? Comments about feedback provided during the public test phases, or beyond ?
Patting yourself in the back publicly isn't communication.
There have been threads on their communication issues since launch though, I don't know why people keep expecting a sudden change from night to day in the way ZOS engages with people on the forums.
There have been points where it's better and it's better than it's been in the past, but the expectation that devs are going to sit on the forums answering in every thread isn't one which is going to be met, at least I don't see it happening.
I don't want to be negative and cynical but it's not going to change, and yet people still think more and more ranting about it will change that. ZOS' communication levels are what ZOS has chosen, we can encourage more, but if we keep expecting the unrealistic and then being mad when we don't get it then we're always going to be unhappy.
89 pages, even if they did not respond to the thread on these forums, you would have thought the topic would have been at least addressed somewhere else. ESO live perhaps, or even that reddit ama where the question was brought up three or four times, (yet apparently avoided).
It was even asked of them directly at pax east, and so far all they did was punt it.
Those changes might not have been good or the ones people wanted, but ZOS made them and decided to stick to them, so that's their decision on it. In theory if and when they go back and do another pass, that thread would have been the place for the feedback needed.
As has been said, they're recruiting more staff, but so far they don't seem to have one.No one expects the devs to spend their day on the boards. Heck, when I see the state of the game, I sure expect them not to. But they have a community manager, right ? What's her job, if not managing the community ? Where is she ? Why doesn't she post anything besides a onbe liner here and there, almost exclusively to acknowledge that people can't log in ? If she's overworked, they can hire someone else. They made 50 million dollars last year, i'm sure they could find a person or two to actually interact with the community, select some topics of importanced to ascend them to whoever it may concern, and give us some informations. Heck, I would do it if they did pay me for it.
This is exactly why they'll never have a known issues list or dev marks to show issues are seen.Constructive as those bug replies "we notice that bug and we will fix on next update"
Several updates after only 1/3 total bugs are fixed.
Not really true, plenty of us complain about them all the time and have our posts and threads still around.It seems that any complaint about ZoS is automatically non constructive.
As has been said, they're recruiting more staff, but so far they don't seem to have one.
The current English CM team has loads of responsibilities beyond these forums, that's probably part of the issue.
From my understanding this is what the current CM handle: Forums communication, social media accounts, player rep programmes, patch notes & relaying information from those sources to people within the company which need it.
I'd imagine they have more roles as well.
However without any of us being at ZOS not much we can say on how they run things internally. I do continue to hold my opinion that one more active CM would be a good thing for the company. I am not sure if Sarah has taken up that role or not as she's been posting a lot of updates on the forum as well.
This is exactly why they'll never have a known issues list or dev marks to show issues are seen.Constructive as those bug replies "we notice that bug and we will fix on next update"
Several updates after only 1/3 total bugs are fixed.
As once they acknowledge it, people expect it fixed in the next update.Not really true, plenty of us complain about them all the time and have our posts and threads still around.It seems that any complaint about ZoS is automatically non constructive.