I would almost rather it be underwhelming, and then be improved upon, than come OP out the gate. Especially with so many people playing them right now. Let them be weak and have their moment, and then slowly reevaluate the skill lines and tweak it to bring it up to par with the others.
Imperial_Voice wrote: »
This isnt a "boo necro" thread. Its a class balance thing. Necro underperforms in every area except tanking.
I've played the Necro class in EQ, EQ2, DAoC, Age of Conan, and other single player games. For myself, this iteration is the weakest that I've seen. It feels more Warden-esque, with annoying gimmicks and time delays, than anything.
I..just don't feel like a master of the undead. Or even a neophyte.
I'm going to take it to 50, get some gear, then do some different content to see how it pans out at that time. Maybe by then there will be some tweaks to make it beefier, and less reliant on a 4th resource for performance.Imperial_Voice wrote: »
This isnt a "boo necro" thread. Its a class balance thing. Necro underperforms in every area except tanking.
Your thread title reads, "Anyone else finding Necromancer underwhelming?", and people are answering you. In fact, your OP was a "boo necro" post. You can always make a new thread with a more specific topic, with guidelines in your post about the material you want to discuss.
IzzyStardust wrote: »Psssht I love mine! What are you trying to do with yours?
I am still disappointed that all their pets are temporary.
DanteMR1995 wrote: »Ya'll are crazy, magnecro is op and I'm destroying everything in PvE and I easily dominate in PvP.