To be honest, if it wasn't part of the subscription, I'd probably drop the sub.
Malacthulhu wrote: »Dragonnord wrote: »Do you know how much $$$ ZOS would lose if they do that? It's fair we have to pay for the bag. I'd be doing the same if I were ZOS.
It is insane that you are worried about their revenue, that is the definition of brainwashed fanboism lol. Think about what you are saying, the only revenue you should worry about is your own. They would have to adapt and stop using cheap gimmicks bc customers stopped enabling them. This is insane, everything wrong with mmos lol.
Where is the Other option? Of course I would like to see it not be subscription locked. But if the crafting bag is giving us more content then why not.
Funny I wouldn't pay Zenimax a subscription fee to play ESO, but I have ESO+. I guess what I am saying is we are getting more worth from having a pseudo subscription. Take away the crafting bag, what is going to replace it to keep getting more bang for our buck?
To be honest, if it wasn't part of the subscription, I'd probably drop the sub.
barney2525 wrote: »Wow. No one is actually voting. Weird.
I guess I'll go with the flow.
Sure! I'd like crafting bag on a free acount.
And I'd like free mount of my choice
And free costumes
And free house of my choice
And free starting gold of one million
And free beer and wings
And free pizza
And......
Wildberryjack wrote: »The game is buy to play and there is nothing you can't do without a sub as long as you've bought the content. They encourage subbing by giving perks and that craft bag is the major one. No they should not give it free, it should stay as part of the sub. If you want the bag that bad then just sub. I mean seriously, if you can't spare a lousy $15 (or less depending) a month then you have bigger issues to deal with than worrying over one feature in a game.
stevenyaub16_ESO wrote: »I vote No, even though I'm not currently subbed.
It's the main selling point of ESO+ for longer term players. And a good source of income for the game.
I think it would hurt the game and we would see a drastic drop off in subscription otherwise. And the game is playable without it.
GarnetFire17 wrote: »stevenyaub16_ESO wrote: »I vote No, even though I'm not currently subbed.
It's the main selling point of ESO+ for longer term players. And a good source of income for the game.
I think it would hurt the game and we would see a drastic drop off in subscription otherwise. And the game is playable without it.
not if you want to have fun
Being a non-subscriber now, I voted "No" only because I understand it's fair to keep it exclusively under ESO+.
I feel that because I don't pay for the game I have no right to expect the same privileges as have the customers who pay.
To be honest, if it wasn't part of the subscription, I'd probably drop the sub.
Malacthulhu wrote: »To be honest, if it wasn't part of the subscription, I'd probably drop the sub.
That is the problem, pretty much forcing people to sub for inventory management should not be the players problem. It is straight up a scam. They should redo the whole sub platform and take a close look at it. The fact people are cool with it is cancerous to me. Anyone have an actual total mat item count for eso? Or yes they could increase bank space cap, but isn't that what housing was suppose to do?
Malacthulhu wrote: »HMalacthulhu wrote: »To be honest, if it wasn't part of the subscription, I'd probably drop the sub.
That is the problem, pretty much forcing people to sub for inventory management should not be the players problem. It is straight up a scam. They should redo the whole sub platform and take a close look at it. The fact people are cool with it is cancerous to me. Anyone have an actual total mat item count for eso? Or yes they could increase bank space cap, but isn't that what housing was suppose to do?
I am harsh on Zenimax. I don't like a lot of things they do. Thing is, this is not a scam. How is it a scam? When it was subscription based and you needed to pay the $15 a month, inventory was still the same. When One Tamerial came out, inventory was still the same.
Inventory never decreased. I left ESO for various reasons. One of them was I thought it was a "scam" as well. Well low and behold I have tired other games and ESO was the BEST when it comes to giving inventory AND increasing inventory WITHOUT paying a penny.
So no, it's not a scam.
As for cancerous, really? Is it killing anyone? Is anyone hurt by it? Cancerous, no. I hope that you never have to see what cancer really is. I have seen it 3 times. That should not be taken lightly. At least if you are going to use that word, then have it in proper context.
What you described is not cancerous at all.
As for housing, no that is not what it was suppose to be. It was the player base that assumed it was suppose to be. I expected it as well. Sadly that was never the intent.
Please next time you want to describe something, make sure you are using the proper language. It does seem you don't really know what you are talking about. I should know. I have done the same as you before. I am not perfect, but I have learned.
You can't be taken serious when not using the proper language to explain yourself.
You need to look up what scammed means and how that applies. Seriously, read the definition. Simply starting the game with sub then moving to f2p model and using inventory management to get people to sub on a f2p fits well within the definition.
I said the behavior is cancerous to online game mmos in general much like pre-ordering is to gaming in general. Cancerous to me because the delusion that the player has any stake in the companies revenue. Cancerous is an adopted gaming slang term as in the unhealthy behavior spreads in an unhealthy way getting exponentially worse.
I have already been called a socialist by someone who prob does not even know what it means. Accused of basically being bad at economics or do not know how business works bc everyone on the eso forum is a expert lol.
GarnetFire17 wrote: »I never like that they decided to stick this behind an subscription wall. It's one of the few things ZOS has done that gets me to grind my teeth when thinking about it. I don't think it was necessary to resort to inventory extortion to sell subs. The subscription has enough value to justify the price for many people without it. If you want to do the double bank space as sub-only that would be fine by me, but the craftbag is too big a quality of life aspect. It would just make the game immensely better for all if they just let everyone have it and that would be a good thing because you don't want people frustrated and quitting the game because they are constantly having to deal with choosing to make room in the inventory every 30 seconds or leave stuff on the ground they could be picking up and selling later since everything you grab is worth at least some gold. I think it was very bad choice.