More Guild Slots?
AuraNebula
✭✭✭✭✭
I know this has been raised multiple times before, but with the game now being around for 5 years and with players being around for exactly the same amount of time, I think it's time to reconsider the amount of slots. I've played with some of these people for years, but doesn't mean I don't want to branch out and meet new people. The game has grown, the amount of people playing has grown. Let our guild slots grow too.
More Guild Slots? 107 votes
Yes more slots
71%
76 votes
No more slots.
28%
31 votes
0
-
AuraNebula✭✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsI'm an endgame player and I've noticed I need at least 2 trading guilds to be able to make gold to support my end game playstyle. I have two trials guilds due to time variations and being able to do more. One social guild, and no room for a pvp guild. No room to branch out anymore without leaving old friends.Edited by AuraNebula on April 19, 2019 6:05PM4
-
Casterial✭✭✭✭✭
✭No more slots.While I do think we should have more based on amount of characters, I do think 5 is plenty at the same time.Daggerfall Covenant:Casterial Stamplar || Casterial DK || Availed NB || Castyrial Sorc || Spooky Casterial Necro
Member since: August 2013
Kill Counter Developer
For the Daggerfall Covenant
The Last Chillrend Empress
Animation Cancelling0 -
Edziu✭✭✭✭✭
✭Yes more slotsas we are forced to be in trade guild to earn gold in any viable and fast way...then we are losing spots for our pve, pvp, friend or rp guilds as single trade guild is not enough if you dont earn valuable items from vet content but selling everything which is barely worth while just wanting to earn any possible additional coin (e.g. intricate items, recipes etc, maybe this is not much gold but still there is more profit for selling them to players than vendor while gaining more gold from trash items if someone cant run harder vet content for better profit like motifs)1 -
Casterial✭✭✭✭✭
✭No more slots.Mettaricana wrote: »Just allow bigger guilds
Thats not related to the primary issue, 500 is plenty... The issue is you get 5
Pick wisely:
Family / RP / PVP / Trial / Trade
Essentially this is the reason we have 5, 1 for each.Daggerfall Covenant:Casterial Stamplar || Casterial DK || Availed NB || Castyrial Sorc || Spooky Casterial Necro
Member since: August 2013
Kill Counter Developer
For the Daggerfall Covenant
The Last Chillrend Empress
Animation Cancelling0 -
AuraNebula✭✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsMettaricana wrote: »Just allow bigger guilds
Thats not related to the primary issue, 500 is plenty... The issue is you get 5
Pick wisely:
Family / RP / PVP / Trial / Trade
Essentially this is the reason we have 5, 1 for each.
If you want to run trials consistently one trial guild is not enough. If you want to make a good amount of gold to support your playstyle one trading guild isn't really enough either.4 -
lillybit✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Yes more slotsMettaricana wrote: »Just allow bigger guilds
Thats not related to the primary issue, 500 is plenty... The issue is you get 5
Pick wisely:
Family / RP / PVP / Trial / Trade
Essentially this is the reason we have 5, 1 for each.
But the game has grown considerably since the start, with things added that aren't covered in that model. What about a housing guild for example? Or a DLC dungeon/achievement guild - trial guilds don't always cater to them.
My point is, it's not the same game as it was when the five guilds rule was originally put in place, it's evolved, and things like this should evolve with it to meet current demands.PS4 EU4 -
Tandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Missing option - fewer slots. That would mean a better trading system that didn't necessitate multiple guild membership, plus a greater sense of guild commitment and loyalty. My suspicion is that it would also mean better performance generally.2 -
AuraNebula✭✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsMissing option - fewer slots. That would mean a better trading system that didn't necessitate multiple guild membership, plus a greater sense of guild commitment and loyalty. My suspicion is that it would also mean better performance generally.
No way, guilds are not exclusive to being only for trading guilds.1 -
Pevey✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭Yes more slotsAnother thing that would help is if you could list more than 30 items in a guild store. Then you would not need to be in as many trade guilds.4 -
Tandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Princessrhaenyra wrote: »Missing option - fewer slots. That would mean a better trading system that didn't necessitate multiple guild membership, plus a greater sense of guild commitment and loyalty. My suspicion is that it would also mean better performance generally.
No way, guilds are not exclusive to being only for trading guilds.
I never said they were, quite the opposite.0 -
AuraNebula✭✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsPrincessrhaenyra wrote: »Missing option - fewer slots. That would mean a better trading system that didn't necessitate multiple guild membership, plus a greater sense of guild commitment and loyalty. My suspicion is that it would also mean better performance generally.
No way, guilds are not exclusive to being only for trading guilds.
I never said they were, quite the opposite.
How would fewer slots make a better trading system? Your first comment was based entirely off of trading.
1 -
Goregrinder✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭How about ZOS just automatically adds every character to every single guild. Or is that not enough guilds?0 -
AuraNebula✭✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsSalvas_Aren wrote: »How about more item slots for the guild store?
Yeah more slots would help. Still doesn't fix other issues though.0 -
FilteredRiddle✭✭✭✭Xbox One NA
The Sentinels of Padomay
Obsidian Guard (Social with PvX Events)Gamers always believe that an epic win is possible and that it's always worth trying, and trying now. Gamers don't sit around.
- Jane McGonigal0 -
idk✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No more slots.More guild slots are not needed. If you are not getting your fill with 5 slots then you have some pretty weak guilds. Find some better ones.
Not long ago I helped some in game friends that are of the more casual persuasion after their guilds leaders left the game. We tried several guilds that had full rosters of players that were logging in, but the issue was such a large majority of those guilds did nothing with the guild. They behaved as though they were dormant.
In other words, there are many guild leaders who think they are successful merely because they maintain a full roster. They are bad leaders because they do nothing real to lead the guild.
In contrast, my raiding guilds boot players who are not active with the guild. They prefer quality over quantity and I suggest you do the same with choosing what guilds are you are part of.
2 -
RebornV3x✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭No more slots.We don't need anymore I actually have a hard time keep 5 guilds even in the rare occasion I do have 5 guilds keeping up with the day to day of each guild would be taxing I have 3 guilds I keep up with on band and that's almost to much.
I say we need less how many guilds maybe 3 max. I have been apart of many many guilds especially on Xbox and a few on PC where they have maxed out rosters but they never do anything in game chat dead, Band barely active, guild leaders never really organize events and when they do less that 1/100th of the guild shows, never respond when wanting to do stuff etc.
having less guilds would cut down on these types of guilds people would be more invested in there guilds if we had 2 or 3 guilds then being scattered in 10 or 15 different guilds and trying to split your time with those guilds.
If you need more that 5 guilds then your in some really crappy guilds
Xbox One - NA GT: RebornV3x
I also play on PC from time to time but I just wanna be left alone on there so sorry.1 -
Erinia✭✭✭Yes more slotsIf you don't need/want more guilds, you can just do not Join more than you want, don't you? Why limit it for those who need/want More guilds? It is not about how good or bad guild you have, or how many time you involve in any of those - ppl have different wishes, and different purpose of their guilds, and aslo different amount of time or efforts they could spend on guilds if it needed at all. So there is no rules, like "you Have to be only in one guild", ESO offer very much of targets, and they all could split between many guild: PvP, PvE trials, PvE questing, trading, RP, housing & furnishing, friends, and whatever else reasons. And i don't get why someone would want to limit me with only one of each type. I need more than one(two, three, more) trading guild, i prefer to not leave old friendly guild just to join guild with new friends, i want both trials and PvP guilds, I may want to be in Werewolf guild for one of my char, and Vampire guild for another char, and also one who love drink mead in the evening and sing nord's song - those guild have different targets, and it can't be considering as "one better than other".
There is no need to decide for me how I want to play, and how many guilds i could need. Give more guild slots and let players choose by themselves how many of it they need. If somebody want to be in only one guild - there is no harm for him, if somebody else want to be in 10. Everybody can choose what fit to their playstyle and possibilities.3 -
AuraNebula✭✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsMore guild slots are not needed. If you are not getting your fill with 5 slots then you have some pretty weak guilds. Find some better ones.
Not long ago I helped some in game friends that are of the more casual persuasion after their guilds leaders left the game. We tried several guilds that had full rosters of players that were logging in, but the issue was such a large majority of those guilds did nothing with the guild. They behaved as though they were dormant.
In other words, there are many guild leaders who think they are successful merely because they maintain a full roster. They are bad leaders because they do nothing real to lead the guild.
In contrast, my raiding guilds boot players who are not active with the guild. They prefer quality over quantity and I suggest you do the same with choosing what guilds are you are part of.
No offense, but literally nothing you said applies to any of the guilds I'm in. Just because something is one way for you, does not make it the same for everyone else.Edited by AuraNebula on April 27, 2019 4:38PM3 -
AuraNebula✭✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsPrincessrhaenyra wrote: »More guild slots are not needed. If you are not getting your fill with 5 slots then you have some pretty weak guilds. Find some better ones.
Not long ago I helped some in game friends that are of the more casual persuasion after their guilds leaders left the game. We tried several guilds that had full rosters of players that were logging in, but the issue was such a large majority of those guilds did nothing with the guild. They behaved as though they were dormant.
In other words, there are many guild leaders who think they are successful merely because they maintain a full roster. They are bad leaders because they do nothing real to lead the guild.
In contrast, my raiding guilds boot players who are not active with the guild. They prefer quality over quantity and I suggest you do the same with choosing what guilds are you are part of.
No offense, but literally nothing you said applies to any of the guilds I'm in. Just because something is one way for you, does not make it the same for everyone else. I've been playing for 3 years, I cant leave guilds that I've been in for equally as long because I met some new people and want to join their guild too. We need more variety.
0 -
lukoi✭✭✭No more slots.I votes no. Simply allow guides to be bigger imo.Edited by lukoi on April 27, 2019 4:44PM0
-
idk✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No more slots.Princessrhaenyra wrote: »More guild slots are not needed. If you are not getting your fill with 5 slots then you have some pretty weak guilds. Find some better ones.
Not long ago I helped some in game friends that are of the more casual persuasion after their guilds leaders left the game. We tried several guilds that had full rosters of players that were logging in, but the issue was such a large majority of those guilds did nothing with the guild. They behaved as though they were dormant.
In other words, there are many guild leaders who think they are successful merely because they maintain a full roster. They are bad leaders because they do nothing real to lead the guild.
In contrast, my raiding guilds boot players who are not active with the guild. They prefer quality over quantity and I suggest you do the same with choosing what guilds are you are part of.
No offense, but literally nothing you said applies to any of the guilds I'm in. Just because something is one way for you, does not make it the same for everyone else.
What I said does seem to apply to the guilds you are in. If you were in quality guilds that met your needs and that you actually contributed to you would not be wanting for more guild slots.
The mere fact that you want more guild slots states that at least some of your guilds are weak guilds and/or have less than stellar leadership. Otherwise they would be keeping your interests instead of you wandering and looking for something else as you clearly are.0 -
Reevster✭✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsDefinitely need more, 10 instead of 5 would be preferred.
With 14 toons I have enough to stock 15 guilds or more. But stuck with only 5 = always running out of storage space with stuff that could be sold if I had more guild slots, but can not.
People saying they don't need more can just not use more if ZOS ups the guild slots, easy fix for them. So they can be happy and those wanting more can be happy. Win Win
Edited by Reevster on April 27, 2019 5:05PM0 -
MrGraves✭✭✭✭Yes more slotsI don't think we need many more but like 1 or 2 more would be nice especially for players that do every kind of content. (rp included) I personally still have 1 slot bc havent found a guild for it yet and not sure what kind of guild for my last slot.
I have 1 trade, 1 for dungeons/trials, 1 rp, one personal/friend guild. And alot of rpers want to be in more than one guild of that kind bc there's alot of different kinds of rp guilds. there are a few that do w/e kinds of rp and accept any kind of character and hub guilds but there's also the more specific ones. and hub guilds aren't very close knit at all so. and if you play more than one character then one specific guild isn't likely to cut it. then you still want to do other things like dungeons/trading/whatever.0 -
Tandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Princessrhaenyra wrote: »Princessrhaenyra wrote: »Missing option - fewer slots. That would mean a better trading system that didn't necessitate multiple guild membership, plus a greater sense of guild commitment and loyalty. My suspicion is that it would also mean better performance generally.
No way, guilds are not exclusive to being only for trading guilds.
I never said they were, quite the opposite.
How would fewer slots make a better trading system? Your first comment was based entirely off of trading.
The basis of my point was that with a better trading system - which means one that is not based on guild membership - you don't need as many guild slots.0 -
Tandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Princessrhaenyra wrote: »Missing option - fewer slots. That would mean a better trading system that didn't necessitate multiple guild membership, plus a greater sense of guild commitment and loyalty. My suspicion is that it would also mean better performance generally.
No way, guilds are not exclusive to being only for trading guilds.
No, but the need to belong to 5 guilds is entirely based on the concept of trading guilds. Have the right for all players to trade unconditional on artificial restrictions like guild membership and you can do fine with fewer guilds.0
