rope_bunny wrote: »Crown Crates aren't really gambling. If you don't get what you want, usually you can just extract the items you don't want in exchange for gems and get what you want that way with the exception of Radiant Apex Mounts.
If crates were banned.
If crates were banned.
I would CHEER!
Just put stuff in the shop for direct purchase and leave it there for a good long while. People will buy what they want and ZOS would still make money. Just stop with the predatory boxes already!
They're not gambling as covered by law, but they are exactly the same methods used in some gabling. It's essentially gambling that doesn't have to be regulated because you're buying a product, not trying to get more money back.rope_bunny wrote: »Crown Crates aren't really gambling. If you don't get what you want, usually you can just extract the items you don't want in exchange for gems and get what you want that way with the exception of Radiant Apex Mounts.
Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »Its keeps them employed. I’m happy
Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »Its keeps them employed. I’m happy
They were employed long before crates existed.
Subscriptions, chapters, DLCs, initial game fee, and all of the other crown store purchases?Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »Bobby_V_Rockit wrote: »Its keeps them employed. I’m happy
They were employed long before crates existed.
They gotta make money to stay employed
redspecter23 wrote: »RNG has never been overly popular as a reward method.
I did not intend to cause arguments but was just thinking outside the box in ways they could use the current crown crates.
Oh and in the UK crown crates are seen as gambling but they haven't been covered by the gaming act yet and the UK may still not go the way of Belgium. They are under review but it may take ages for it to be sorted for obvious reasons.
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »Canned_Apples wrote: »No, they are 100% Gambling. 100%.
Dungeon runs are also gambling - you spend your time ("time is money, friend") to open the loot box hit the end boss and hope that the loot you want pops out.
...but yeah, they'd just switch to putting the stuff in the crown store straight. Probably have a few less variants (like not every type of mount in fire/ice/dead/scales/rainbows/etc)
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »Canned_Apples wrote: »No, they are 100% Gambling. 100%.
Dungeon runs are also gambling - you spend your time ("time is money, friend") to open the loot box hit the end boss and hope that the loot you want pops out.
Mathius_Mordred wrote: »What is the issue with the gambling crates, everyone has to be over 18 to play don't they? Is it that they don't explicitly specify that it's gambling? because everyone knows that it is anyway. I don't have an issue with gambling in games as long as they are not targeted towards minors, which would be unethical and possibly illegal in some countries. At the end of the day, we are all adults, we make a choice on how we spend our disposable income and we don't need a nanny state to save us from our own impulsive desires thank you very much.
Jayman1000 wrote: »Mathius_Mordred wrote: »What is the issue with the gambling crates, everyone has to be over 18 to play don't they? Is it that they don't explicitly specify that it's gambling? because everyone knows that it is anyway. I don't have an issue with gambling in games as long as they are not targeted towards minors, which would be unethical and possibly illegal in some countries. At the end of the day, we are all adults, we make a choice on how we spend our disposable income and we don't need a nanny state to save us from our own impulsive desires thank you very much.
Because if you are doing gambling then you need to adhere to gambling laws. But by using loopholes in the law zos and other videogame companies using gambling practices, can avoid following gambling laws because they can claim that it is "technically not gambling", even though for all intent and purposes this is gambling.
Mathius_Mordred wrote: »Jayman1000 wrote: »Mathius_Mordred wrote: »What is the issue with the gambling crates, everyone has to be over 18 to play don't they? Is it that they don't explicitly specify that it's gambling? because everyone knows that it is anyway. I don't have an issue with gambling in games as long as they are not targeted towards minors, which would be unethical and possibly illegal in some countries. At the end of the day, we are all adults, we make a choice on how we spend our disposable income and we don't need a nanny state to save us from our own impulsive desires thank you very much.
Because if you are doing gambling then you need to adhere to gambling laws. But by using loopholes in the law zos and other videogame companies using gambling practices, can avoid following gambling laws because they can claim that it is "technically not gambling", even though for all intent and purposes this is gambling.
Then isn't it the politicians' role to adjust those laws to include this new type of gambling? And until they do so ZoS and others are not actually breaking any laws? What, if any, current gambling laws are they breaking? I'm no expert in this area but from my cursory glance at the topic, they don't seem to be breaking any because there is no real-world financial payout or material prizes from the chance boxes. Until the laws are changed then these forms of gambling will continue.
You could also say that playing a trial for a chance to win something you want is also gambling, in this case you are paying with your time, and time=money, for a random chance, and yet because no real-world money is involved nobody says anything.
As long as this game remains targeted at adults, ie over 18, then I have no issue with it, if under 18s are playing, and I know they are, then it is for their parents to ensure they are not spending their money on gambling, as I do with my children.