Marshall1289 wrote: »
We should respect their decision and roll with it, we don't have control over their decision making process and this happens all time when it comes to development and design. The fact that we found out about their concept for the ultimate before it was ready is cool enough, but it was ultimately left on the cutting room floor.
It already happened. It was called cataclysm, if they do another expansion based on the majority of what the their forums say...david_m_18b16_ESO wrote: »Marshall1289 wrote: »
We should respect their decision and roll with it, we don't have control over their decision making process and this happens all time when it comes to development and design. The fact that we found out about their concept for the ultimate before it was ready is cool enough, but it was ultimately left on the cutting room floor.
I strongly disagree. That's pretty much why their is NDA so they don't release info that might change so much that we end disapointed.
I never understand poeple claiming that gamers shouldn't complain about the developper decision. We can surely complaint and even sometimes get thigns changed. We aren't making the decision, but we can surely influence it.
Just take blizzard for a second. Their next X pac will be mostly made of what players wanted and everything they complained will be removed. They lost too much money already.
david_m_18b16_ESO wrote: »Marshall1289 wrote: »
We should respect their decision and roll with it, we don't have control over their decision making process and this happens all time when it comes to development and design. The fact that we found out about their concept for the ultimate before it was ready is cool enough, but it was ultimately left on the cutting room floor.
I strongly disagree. That's pretty much why their is NDA so they don't release info that might change so much that we end disapointed.
I never understand people claiming that gamers shouldn't complain about the developper decision. We can surely complaint and even sometimes get thigns changed. We aren't making the decision, but we can surely influence it.
Just take blizzard for a second. Their next X pac will be mostly made of what players wanted and everything they complained will be removed. They lost too much money already.

Dark_Lord_Kuro wrote: »Dont you dare touch my fleshy!
david_m_18b16_ESO wrote: »Just take blizzard for a second. Their next X pac will be mostly made of what players wanted and everything they complained will be removed. They lost too much money already.
Dark_Lord_Kuro wrote: »Dont you dare touch my fleshy!
I dont understand your comment. Would adding an OPTION to have a dragon morph really touch your precious flesh colossus that badly? Even though in my idea I literally said there would be an OPTION for the Fleshy boi too....lol.
Michaelkeir wrote: »From the moment the concept art dropped I was not a fan of the dragon. In a few old post of mine I was advocating for their to be a flesh colossal of some kind or bone colossal of some kind....or both. Most Necromancers in eso call on these 2 abilities. A dragon seems to chapter specific and I'm sure the devs learned their lesson from wardens and Morrowind.
Lore wise there is only 1 Necromancer who summoned a dragon (Fanglair) and he studied and prepared for that no telling how long. Our necromancers are new (according to ZoS) and can't even summon permanent zombies or skeletons like other npc Necromancers. If they can't do that then logic dictates they can't summon a dragon either.
Michaelkeir wrote: »From the moment the concept art dropped I was not a fan of the dragon. In a few old post of mine I was advocating for their to be a flesh colossal of some kind or bone colossal of some kind....or both. Most Necromancers in eso call on these 2 abilities. A dragon seems to chapter specific and I'm sure the devs learned their lesson from wardens and Morrowind.
Lore wise there is only 1 Necromancer who summoned a dragon (Fanglair) and he studied and prepared for that no telling how long. Our necromancers are new (according to ZoS) and can't even summon permanent zombies or skeletons like other npc Necromancers. If they can't do that then logic dictates they can't summon a dragon either.
So our necromancers aren't powerful enough to do that, /but/ we're powerful enough to turn into a Bone Goliath? Something only done in a very hard-to-do ritual and we literally dont even SEE it done by any of the npcs in the game?
How come what you're saying seems to only apply to the bone dragon and not that? Granted the bone goliath isnt chapter specific, but truly I don't think they intended for necromancer's bone dragon to be a specific reference to the dragon chapter. I personally feel like it was a throw-back to Fanglair if anything, but the fact it was being added in the season of dragons was just a happy coincidence that made it fit even more.