
DocFrost72 wrote: »ESO got an award for literally doing what you think would get people accepted faster, normalizing (specifically in this game the LGB part of the acronym) people who just want to live their lives.
perogwin_ESO wrote: »DocFrost72 wrote: »ESO got an award for literally doing what you think would get people accepted faster, normalizing (specifically in this game the LGB part of the acronym) people who just want to live their lives.
Doc did you run all of Summerset yet? The T is now included also in the game and in a pretty spectacular story way.
DocFrost72 wrote: »
I actually haven't, truth be told. I'd imagine being trans is a lot less "intensive" and a lot more thorough in a world where magic exists, so that's neat they added it.
perogwin_ESO wrote: »DocFrost72 wrote: »ESO got an award for literally doing what you think would get people accepted faster, normalizing (specifically in this game the LGB part of the acronym) people who just want to live their lives.
Doc did you run all of Summerset yet? The T is now included also in the game and in a pretty spectacular story way.
oxygen_thief wrote: »what does it mean? what is an unfriendly game then? is it a game where you should crash kill and destroy npc which are gays? i dont know any game with such a plot. do you know?
This, add that TES has larger issues like multiple species, the end of the thief guild was very nice.Wildberryjack wrote: »I don't need "representation" in a video game. If it makes sense to the story then toss it in, that's fine. But don't shove it down anyone's throat in an obvious SJW PC move because all that does is irritate most everyone, even ME.
As for the award, way to go ESO!!! *claps* Well deserved.

This, add that TES has larger issues like multiple species, the end of the thief guild was very nice.Wildberryjack wrote: »I don't need "representation" in a video game. If it makes sense to the story then toss it in, that's fine. But don't shove it down anyone's throat in an obvious SJW PC move because all that does is irritate most everyone, even ME.
As for the award, way to go ESO!!! *claps* Well deserved.
The Khajiit lady who thought she was forced away as he misunderstood the chance to run from slavery.
The villain lady who had Argonian boys as pets earlier.
All done extremely well.
Seen earlier to, like in Skyrim the guy who wanted an Orcis girlfriend.
It can go from very sad like the two old Bosmers to jokes like
Surprised this thread is still open.
The best way for people to be accepted as normal is for them to be treated as normal. I can understand why interests groups want to promote their exposure in media though. The most effective way for people to accept something is for them to become accustomed to it. But I also understand the flip side of the argument because I don't see organizations handing out awards for heterosexual representation either. So both sides make good points.
perogwin_ESO wrote: »DocFrost72 wrote: »
I actually haven't, truth be told. I'd imagine being trans is a lot less "intensive" and a lot more thorough in a world where magic exists, so that's neat they added it.
Make sure to run the House of Reverie Story Arc in the town of Rellenthil on Summerset, it was really well done!
Yes, note she probably was the blacksmith in an one horse town in Elsweyr or Alik'rFleetwoodSmack wrote: »This, add that TES has larger issues like multiple species, the end of the thief guild was very nice.Wildberryjack wrote: »I don't need "representation" in a video game. If it makes sense to the story then toss it in, that's fine. But don't shove it down anyone's throat in an obvious SJW PC move because all that does is irritate most everyone, even ME.
As for the award, way to go ESO!!! *claps* Well deserved.
The Khajiit lady who thought she was forced away as he misunderstood the chance to run from slavery.
The villain lady who had Argonian boys as pets earlier.
All done extremely well.
Seen earlier to, like in Skyrim the guy who wanted an Orcis girlfriend.
It can go from very sad like the two old Bosmers to jokes like
HAHAHAHA. The dead skeever. That one always gets me. FREAKING CATS. "I like you, so I brought you this dead thing."
Takes-No-Prisoner wrote: »This quest was one of my favorites. The NPCs life choices were intriguing and felt real. I hope we get to see this character again soon!
VaranisArano wrote: »Surprised this thread is still open.
The best way for people to be accepted as normal is for them to be treated as normal. I can understand why interests groups want to promote their exposure in media though. The most effective way for people to accept something is for them to become accustomed to it. But I also understand the flip side of the argument because I don't see organizations handing out awards for heterosexual representation either. So both sides make good points.
What flip side? For better or for worse, the vast majority of video game characters are heterosexual. The vast majority of love stories in video games are heterosexual. Heterosexuality is more or less treated as the norm, with LGBTQ stories either getting "extra" categories or left out entirely.
Anyone complaining that LGBTQ are getting "extra" or "special" treatment because they have their own category for awards is willfully ignoring that the previous history was one of not being included at all. It wasnt a matter of not having awards - more like not even having their stories told, which is far worse.
DocFrost72 wrote: »@VaranisArano
Slightly off topic, but allow me to offer a reasonable viewpoint that (it seems) does not align with your own.
I would personally subscribe to the idea that every person wants to be accepted. I'm 100% for tolerance.
However,
>Some< within the LGBT+ community give off the impression that they are different or exceptional for their sexuality, identity, or nonconformance to traditional gender roles (Me personally: Power to them). It is hard to convincingly argue that one should be accepted as "normal" while simultaneously expressing as much difference from the norm as they can to intentionally display their unique identity.
The argument is NOT that the LGBT community shouldn't be accepted. They should be. The argument is some subsections of the community and some aspects of it make that mission complicated. It is not anti-LGBT for me to say I dislike people that make their *entire identity as a person* "a member of the LBGT+ community". It is simply that that person is one dimensional. People are people, and we should treat everyone as people. Even part of the LBGT+ acronym includes the word "ally" (as of my teaching of the acronym). Allies are inherently "others" that work with the "us" to solve a common problem. That seems to be discussing an emphasized separation where none should exist.
Talking it out is the best way to solve ignorance, btw.
DocFrost72 wrote: »@VaranisArano
Slightly off topic, but allow me to offer a reasonable viewpoint that (it seems) does not align with your own.
I would personally subscribe to the idea that every person wants to be accepted. I'm 100% for tolerance.
However,
>Some< within the LGBT+ community give off the impression that they are different or exceptional for their sexuality, identity, or nonconformance to traditional gender roles (Me personally: Power to them). It is hard to convincingly argue that one should be accepted as "normal" while simultaneously expressing as much difference from the norm as they can to intentionally display their unique identity.
The argument is NOT that the LGBT community shouldn't be accepted. They should be. The argument is some subsections of the community and some aspects of it make that mission complicated. It is not anti-LGBT for me to say I dislike people that make their *entire identity as a person* "a member of the LBGT+ community". It is simply that that person is one dimensional. People are people, and we should treat everyone as people. Even part of the LBGT+ acronym includes the word "ally" (as of my teaching of the acronym). Allies are inherently "others" that work with the "us" to solve a common problem. That seems to be discussing an emphasized separation where none should exist.
Talking it out is the best way to solve ignorance, btw.