Hoolielulu wrote: »Now the question is, will I be able to walk out a door without being attacked?
russelmmendoza wrote: »I just think skyrim dragons are better.
They have 4 limbs and huge wing span.
Eso dragons have their wings on their front limbs.
They look like their crawling, instead of standing high and mighty against those poor humans in their presence.
starkerealm wrote: »The concept was good, but they look way to bright and colorful for my liking.
Some of that is a deliberate art choice. Skyrim's dragons were very washed out, because everything in TES5 is washed out. It reinforces the feeling of the cold, harsh, environment. But it does mean everything looks faded. ESO, in contrast, is much more vibrant.
russelmmendoza wrote: »I just think skyrim dragons are better.
They have 4 limbs and huge wing span.
Eso dragons have their wings on their front limbs.
They look like their crawling, instead of standing high and mighty against those poor humans in their presence.

Haven't seen one yet however...
in the words of a friend's signature, "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup."
Laurie E. Rozakis wrote:Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
~ The Complete Idiot's Guide to Grammar and Style
It would actually be cool if the dragon fights were similar to what Capcom did with the big boss dragon in Dragon’s Dogma. You got a window of time to wail away at the thing’s massive health bar, then it flew away. Players from all over the world had to take turns chipping away at it until it finally died. The Ur Dragon, I think it was called? Then you got loot after it died, based on the damage you did. Now that was one massive dragon.
Good times.
WuffyCerulei wrote: »
Feeling indifferent about their looks tbh.
Somewhat overwhelmed that they will be trial enemies that only 0,001% of the player base can master. Either that or the world events where they show up will be underwhelming. You don't get to kill them so I guess they pop up, summon some baddies and leave. That's it.
WuffyCerulei wrote: »
Are you saying every wyvern is a dragon, but not all dragons are wyverns? Mind... blown... /s
starkerealm wrote: »It would actually be cool if the dragon fights were similar to what Capcom did with the big boss dragon in Dragon’s Dogma. You got a window of time to wail away at the thing’s massive health bar, then it flew away. Players from all over the world had to take turns chipping away at it until it finally died. The Ur Dragon, I think it was called? Then you got loot after it died, based on the damage you did. Now that was one massive dragon.
Good times.
The Ur-Dragon was a really interesting fight. I mean, across the board, Dragon's Dogma had a lot of really interesting concepts getting floated around, and the Ur-Dragon was one of those.
I don't think the Ur-Dragon fight would really fit an MMO, per se. Actually, let me step back, I know it would, with multiple players in the same instance, but those kinds of massive world boss encounters can easily turn into a lagfest. Either way, that is a really cool game. Never played the MMO they made out of it, though.
HappyLittleTree wrote: »I like them. even tho i liked some dragons in skyrim like the twins that come out of the ice in the dawnguard dlc (they were pretty unique)
I think overall the dragons in eso look and feel better to me.
starkerealm wrote: »I... I thought the dragons in skyrim looked pretty unique, I guess. 🤓
I'm going from memory right now, but Skyrim only had about 15 dragon models total. A few were pretty memorable, but aside from a handful of unique ones (Paarthunax, Alduin, Durnirviir), they were all reused. Even some of the unique named ones were simply copies of non-named variants.
That said, if you didn't spend a lot of time hunting dragons, you might not notice.
I just think it's funny that for the last 5 years players have been saying they'll be no dragons in eso...
I just think it's funny that for the last 5 years players have been saying they'll be no dragons in eso...
I'm pretty sure the devs themselves said they had no intention of doing it for the first few years because it wasnt congruent with the lore for the time period that ESO takes place in.
WuffyCerulei wrote: »WuffyCerulei wrote: »
Are you saying every wyvern is a dragon, but not all dragons are wyverns? Mind... blown... /s
That logic is like saying all dalmations are dogs, therefore all dogs are dalmations ಠ_ಠ
WuffyCerulei wrote: »WuffyCerulei wrote: »
Are you saying every wyvern is a dragon, but not all dragons are wyverns? Mind... blown... /s
That logic is like saying all dalmations are dogs, therefore all dogs are dalmations ಠ_ಠ
Uhm... no it's not. It's like saying all dalmatians are dogs, but not all dogs are dalmatians.
edit for clarification
In other words A is in B, but not all B is in A -- mathematically (or data wise) this pertains to sets and super sets. Set B contains all of set A, but set A does not contain all of set B; in other words set B is a superset of set A, or set A is a subset of set B.
Denoted:
WuffyCerulei wrote: »WuffyCerulei wrote: »WuffyCerulei wrote: »
Are you saying every wyvern is a dragon, but not all dragons are wyverns? Mind... blown... /s
That logic is like saying all dalmations are dogs, therefore all dogs are dalmations ಠ_ಠ
Uhm... no it's not. It's like saying all dalmatians are dogs, but not all dogs are dalmatians.
edit for clarification
In other words A is in B, but not all B is in A -- mathematically (or data wise) this pertains to sets and super sets. Set B contains all of set A, but set A does not contain all of set B; in other words set B is a superset of set A, or set A is a subset of set B.
Denoted:
I’m still trying to understand how you got me saying that all dragon are wyverns from “Wyverns are dragons.”