Vulsahdaal wrote: »The appearance is one of the effects of being a vampire. It was made sense to me that there's this kind of pros and cons(in fact, a subjective con).
Why is it that you want to be a vampire and avoid seeing it?
I too want Orc bonuses without looking like an Orc, can I have that then?
Good lord what's wrong with you people? (sorry, it's getting a little frustrating lol) Again I ask...how would it affect you in any way, shape, or form if someone else is allowed to have their character look the way the character was created? Why would you argue against it? It doesn't affect you at all...
Besides that, your race argument makes no sense. It would be a different thing is Vampire was a race chosen at the beginning of the game. But no, it's a skill line that costs skill points and experience to upgrade, just like all the other skill lines.
But again...we're asking for an option. An OPTION. The same way we can hide our helmet if we don't want to see it. An OPTION. If you like the way your vampire looks, great! I don't want to force my opinion on you...by all means keep your vampire's appearance the way it is. But I, and others, would like the option to cover it up. An option that you can opt out of and not be affected by. At all...
I do get it. I have magicka characters also, and not a single one of them is a vamp. Why? Simply because I do not want them to look like a vamp. I dont like the way vamps look (sorry to the ones who do, its just my opinion).
So its really simple, if you dont want to look like a vamp- dont be one.
Now, going back to options- usually something I am all for. But this I cant get behind. Not unless it is discussed to fix werewolves (of which I do have one) as well.
I want werewolf passives, but without having to have fur and a tail. Yes, its true that I dont have fur and tail most of the time- but you know what else I dont have?
Werewolf passives and skills. Cant have those unless I show fur and tail.
The way you vamps make it sound is like you want the passives and skills full time but not look like a vamp. This isnt right, and I think is why many are 'contrarians'
Instead, you should ask to make vamp take up a slot as an ultimate like werewolf, and you will only be vamp ugly when vamp ultimate is engaged and this will also be the only time that vamp passives and skills are available to your character.
If you put it in these terms, you may find that you will have more support among the non vamps and 'contrarians'.
Of course then those who like the way vamps look now might be upset, but a skin can be offered to them to make them look like vamps full time. Its about the options, right?
But lipstick and eyeshadow already work on vampires. There isn’t any “foundation” makeup in the game.
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
I really don't get why you contrarians want to make things so difficult for others. I suspect Finder is on the right track with his/her post above explaining why people actively work to stop others from getting something: it doesn't benefit you, so you actively work against it. Just plain selfish.
One thing to keep in mind: I'm only asking it be an OPTION. Like I said in the op, if you like the vampire look, keep it. I'm not trying to force my opinion on anyone.
And frankly...the argument that 10% regen is the trade-off for the horrible look is asinine. We have entire skill trees that grant us benefits, many of which are stronger than those of vampirism, yet there are no trade-offs for those. They cost skill points and skill points only.
All I want is an option for my character to look the way I made her.
myskyrim26 wrote: »BrianLovesLisa wrote: »No, because this is not twilight. Surprised you did not ask to add sparkling as well. YOU choose to be a Monster, now you are gonna get the cure or "Unlive??" with it
Do some lore research. Some vampires are not changed at all. They are monsters yet look like just as any ordinary mer or men. No pale skin, no glowing eyes, nothing. Did you play Oblivion at all?
NO NO NO
Appearance is one the trade offs for the already OP benefits and at that it is insignificant and yet here is another thread complaining.
Either you get no benefits when not in vampire form or just live with it.
I really don't get why you contrarians want to make things so difficult for others. I suspect Finder is on the right track with his/her post above explaining why people actively work to stop others from getting something: it doesn't benefit you, so you actively work against it. Just plain selfish.
One thing to keep in mind: I'm only asking it be an OPTION. Like I said in the op, if you like the vampire look, keep it. I'm not trying to force my opinion on anyone.
And frankly...the argument that 10% regen is the trade-off for the horrible look is asinine. We have entire skill trees that grant us benefits, many of which are stronger than those of vampirism, yet there are no trade-offs for those. They cost skill points and skill points only.
All I want is an option for my character to look the way I made her.
You do. Theres an NPC that can cure vampirism
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
a question. where are people getting an idea that vampires of elder scrolls, in particular Lamae Bal's line (which is what players are, and we are specifically her scions, more powerful and more beautiful according to the lore) - have no reflections? I've been trying to look and it seems like its an assumption that players make becasue Bram Stoker's vampires cast no reflection, but the only mention of mirrors in relation to vampires i have found so far is that one of the bloodlines has powers THROUGH mirrors and can enthrall people with their help.
starkerealm wrote: »a question. where are people getting an idea that vampires of elder scrolls, in particular Lamae Bal's line (which is what players are, and we are specifically her scions, more powerful and more beautiful according to the lore) - have no reflections? I've been trying to look and it seems like its an assumption that players make becasue Bram Stoker's vampires cast no reflection, but the only mention of mirrors in relation to vampires i have found so far is that one of the bloodlines has powers THROUGH mirrors and can enthrall people with their help.
It's Dracula. By extension, that's been baked into the subset for "Vampire characteristics," in pop-culture, even though it's not universal there. Take something like Ultraviolet, and this is ramped up to the point where Vampires aren't visible to cameras at all, or Vampire: The Masquerade, where only one Clan (the Lasombra) manifest that trait.
The Elder Scrolls has mostly stayed away from that, I suspect, because no characters cast reflections in most of the games.
Lois McMaster Bujold "A Civil Campaign"Reputation is what other people know about you. Honor is what you know about yourself. Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the ***
But lipstick and eyeshadow already work on vampires. There isn’t any “foundation” makeup in the game.
umm... the whole point of foundation is that you cannot see it, it matches your skin.
moreover, I already made a suggestion that work similarly to a toggle for wolf, except the other way around. lose part of your magika pool to maintain glamour. want full magika pool back - disable the glamour toggle. but even that is not good enough apparently, the truth is... you all don't want people to look normal and still be vampires. even though werewolves (and ofr the record my main IS one) get to run around in normal human form bulk of the time with NO visual drawbacks.
Tomorrow when I get in game I’ll take pictures. It dulls tattoos but not lipstick and eyeshadowApostateHobo wrote: »
Tomorrow when I get in game I’ll take pictures. It dulls tattoos but not lipstick and eyeshadow


Hippie4927 wrote: »Tomorrow when I get in game I’ll take pictures. It dulls tattoos but not lipstick and eyeshadow
That's not entirely true. I just bought the cosmetic pack in the crown store that has about 122 face markings because I wanted a lipstick for my vamp. Not one of the lipsticks in the pack show on her, not even the black one! The good ones that showup on vamps are in the crown crates. Same for eyeshadow. We shouldn't have to wait for certain crates to come back just to get makeup for a vampire.
Logic clearly isn't something that works with some of you. There is no logical reason for us not to be able to look normal as vampires. So far we have:
*Flawed argument #1: Vampirism is so powerful, there needs to be a tradeoff.
->The Truth: The only concession I can give this argument is "overpowered" is subjective. So maybe in your mind may overpowered, but in my opinion there are plenty other abilities that are on par, or better. The Psijic line for instance, offers a 5k damage shield while blocking, along with 30% damage reduction with passives. The Psijic ultimate also has a morph that gives a passive 8% damage reduction. The warden's Winter's Embrace ultimate has a morph that gives 8% max magicka. The werewolf ultimate increases stamina recovery by 15% while slotted. An Undaunted passive gives 6% to health, magicka, and stamina for having at least one piece of light/medium/heavy gear (which also allows you to benefit from the gear passives).
I could go on and on about other very powerful and useful abilities that have absolutely no drawback, but I hope you get the point.
*Flawed argument #2: "Vampires are unholy abominations and their wretched appearance is appropriate."
->The Truth: We're playing a game where we can polymorph to become skeletons and goblins. You're really going with the "unholy abomination" card? What exactly does being an "unholy abomination" have to do with applying a little makeup? Also, as someone already pointed out, there are vampire npc's IN THE GAME ALREADY that look normal. That should be enough in itself. Besides, there's absolutely nothing lorebreaking about applying some makeup to give pale skin some pigment (we can pretend a thrall applied it for us since vampires can't see their reflection).
*Flawed arguemnt #3: But you knew that player ESO vampires looked this way before you chose to pursue it.
->The Truth: Things change all the time. We also knew Argonian racial passives made them optimal for tanking before the last update but guess what? Things change. All we're asking for is an OPTION to look the same. As I've said multiple times...it wouldn't affect you at all so why do you care? It would allow me and others to better enjoy the game. Why are you so against that?
But anyway, it seems some of you just want to disagree for the sake of disagreeing. No matter how much logic and reasoning is thrown at you, you'll keep parroting the same flawed arguments you've been saying. I just hope someone at ZOS someday decides to let us hide the vampire look the same way we can click one button to hide our helm.
CMDR_Un1k0rn wrote: »How do vamps even put on makeup since they can't see their reflection in the mirror?Sheezabeast wrote: »How do vamps even put on makeup since they can't see their reflection in the mirror?
Apparently you forgot about the Cyrodiil vampires (I think that’s them) who can blend in perfectly among the mortalsBrianLovesLisa wrote: »No, because this is not twilight. Surprised you did not ask to add sparkling as well. YOU choose to be a Monster, now you are gonna get the cure or "Unlive??" with it
I really don't get why you contrarians want to make things so difficult for others. I suspect Finder is on the right track with his/her post above explaining why people actively work to stop others from getting something: it doesn't benefit you, so you actively work against it. Just plain selfish.
One thing to keep in mind: I'm only asking it be an OPTION. Like I said in the op, if you like the vampire look, keep it. I'm not trying to force my opinion on anyone.
And frankly...the argument that 10% regen is the trade-off for the horrible look is asinine. We have entire skill trees that grant us benefits, many of which are stronger than those of vampirism, yet there are no trade-offs for those. They cost skill points and skill points only.
All I want is an option for my character to look the way I made her.
Your character looks they way you made her, YOU MADE her a vampire..so what is the issue. This has been like this for 5 years, game launched like this, you knew what would happen.
This has been discussed ad infinitum and frankly the argument that appearance is an issue for vampires is asinine.
"It's not a problem for me so it could never be a problem for anyone"
You don't realize how selfish you sound?
My whole premise is vampires are very powerful as is in game. DEVs decided appearance is a fair trade off for that power and I agree, in fact I think it is not enough but that is where it is at right now.