Why would they? Zenimax loves to brag about the 11 MILLION stories told. If they didn't allow bots, they wouldn't have sold that many copies.
After all, if this isn't true, that would mean over 10 million people bought the game and stopped playing it. (or what ever the numbers are playing. That would still be a lot of people not playing the game.)
Is it annoying? Yes. Is it harming you? I don't think so. If so how? It really is a non issue that you shouldn't worry yourself over.
IndyWendieGo wrote: »Honestly, ZoS needs to start the Gamemaster program again because issues like this (and others) would have an actual near real-time answer. But what do we get instead? A faulty reporting system algorithm that's only useful when people people report en mass instead of... You know. Going through the actual reports in an orderly fashion.
For the record though, I'd have been agreeing with some that ZoS eventually gets to them. In my experience it took almost three months for the same bot train with the SAME NAMES to get banned in Alikr. What did it take? Coming to the forums with dozens of screenshots to even prove that it was happening. So while it may have been eventual at one point, I still see several of the same bot farmer trains I've reported almost a year ago.
Remember folks, real Gamemasters have a (z) next to their name. Don't be fooled by imposters.

MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
I would like to have a Member of the Zos Team respond to all of us about the reason they do not do anything about the BOT Farmers. It IS a Breach of Zenimax TOS:
[snip]
Why, when so many players report these cheaters, you do nothing about it. They leave and come right back.
lordrichter wrote: »I would like to have a Member of the Zos Team respond to all of us about the reason they do not do anything about the BOT Farmers. It IS a Breach of Zenimax TOS:
[snip]
Why, when so many players report these cheaters, you do nothing about it. They leave and come right back.
ZOS is not going to respond. They have commented, in the past, on large scale actions against cheaters, but they don't comment when it comes to individuals. I think they should periodically come out and say that they are taking action against bots, just to remind people, but ZOS does not follow such suggestions.
That said, we know a few things about how ZOS treats bots. The first thing we know, at least on PC platform, is that ZOS does take action against bots run for profit outside the game. These bots usually come back, under new identities. There is money to be made from ESO, and a few account deletions are not going to stand in the way of that.
Second, we know that ZOS has a three tier punishment system, and they don't talk about who gets what. The first tier is a formal warning. The player is free to continue to play the game, but is told to stop doing whatever it was that cause the warning. The player has the choice to heed the warning or disregard it. This apparently only applies to people who ZOS feels are players, not the people I mentioned above that are trying to make money from the game. There is no way a Warning will be noticed in the game, unless the player admits to it.
After that, the next tier is a suspension. They have to stay away from the game, on that account, for a set number of hours. This might be the second action, or if ZOS feels that it is necessary, they might start with this. Again, this is for players, and it is up to the player whether to resume the behavior after the suspension. This action might be noticed, if it is observed that the player is missing for a couple days. After that, there is no way to tell, unless they admit to it.
The top tier is the ban, which is where the account is locked for a significant amount of time. In theory, permanently, but nothing is really permanent as long as the account still exists. ZOS might start with this, if the situation warrants, but my guess is that it is a last resort. This is really the only action that is likely to be noticed, and it may be confused with a Warning or Suspension, if the player responds to a lesser tier by voluntarily leaving the game.
All of those punishments depend upon the player being noticed doing Bad Things, reported, and reported enough to attract the attention of ZOS. ZOS has vaguely mentioned a reporting threshold that the player has to exceed for standard ToS infractions, like cheating, botting, behavior, and other things I will label as "misdemeanors". Players that are above the "misdemeanor" level, like credible threats of harm to themselves or others outside of the game, are probably taken more seriously, and with a lower reporting threshold, but ZOS has not really come out and said this.
I mention all of this because some people think that if they report someone, they will just go "pouf" and vanish in a matter of hours, and that is not the case. Even if enough people report the player, it might take a few days, a week, maybe more, before the threshold is reached and ZOS takes action, and then only if they agree that there is evidence that action needs to be taken.
On top of all that, my impression is that it is an order of magnitude more complicated on the console. Ultimately, I think that ZOS has to answer to Microsoft and Sony when they ban one of their customers from ESO. All three stand to lose money from this if they player leaves, and if the player was not violating the Microsoft or Sony ToS, then it is not a slam-dunk. This may apply to Steam customers, as well.
Of course, I am not speaking for ZOS. I am relaying my observations and opinions on the matter. ZOS is free to jump in and clarify, or contradict, not that they will.
MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
More bots = wrecked economy
More bots = more gold selling
More bots = players botting have unfair advantage
More bots = violating the EULA
More bots = players not botting giving up farming putting all resources farmed in the botting players control
More bots = making certain mobs and quests broke because mobs / area is farmed to where you cannot get a drop
Need I go on or do you wish to continue with your short sighted selfishness?
MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
Here's some reading for you.
TL;DR - Prices settle to what people are willing to pay for them, with or without bots. Removing bots won't ruin the economy or increase prices drastically.
MartiniDaniels wrote: »MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
More bots = wrecked economy
More bots = more gold selling
More bots = players botting have unfair advantage
More bots = violating the EULA
More bots = players not botting giving up farming putting all resources farmed in the botting players control
More bots = making certain mobs and quests broke because mobs / area is farmed to where you cannot get a drop
Need I go on or do you wish to continue with your short sighted selfishness?
In ~1500 hours of gameplay, I saw just several bot trains.. i roam craglorn often killing those portals and nirncrux mines for fun, and i got fair share of mats from there. I don't see difference between bots and addons that provide additional info about what's going on, especially in pvp, but raid notifier is a joke too. I mean any person with this addon got "unfair" advantage.
So following your logic:
Advanced UI addons = wrecked difficulty in PVE
Advanced UI addons = cheaper motifs = wrecked economy
Advanced UI addons = players receive unfair advantage in PVP
Advanced UI addons = easier writ making = wrecked economy
"People will pay whatever if takes to buy one." < - then that's your problem, not bots. Botting only takes advantage of that. You literally just posted that no one would pay 5k for Kuta... but they would if that was the cheapest price out there, lolEmma_Overload wrote: »MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
Here's some reading for you.
TL;DR - Prices settle to what people are willing to pay for them, with or without bots. Removing bots won't ruin the economy or increase prices drastically.
LOL, please go back to school. There is no substitute for a gold mat in ESO economy - people will pay whatever it takes to buy one. I don't want to pay any more than necessary, and I'm guessing most other players don't, either.
MartiniDaniels wrote: »MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
More bots = wrecked economy
More bots = more gold selling
More bots = players botting have unfair advantage
More bots = violating the EULA
More bots = players not botting giving up farming putting all resources farmed in the botting players control
More bots = making certain mobs and quests broke because mobs / area is farmed to where you cannot get a drop
Need I go on or do you wish to continue with your short sighted selfishness?
In ~1500 hours of gameplay, I saw just several bot trains.. i roam craglorn often killing those portals and nirncrux mines for fun, and i got fair share of mats from there. I don't see difference between bots and addons that provide additional info about what's going on, especially in pvp, but raid notifier is a joke too. I mean any person with this addon got "unfair" advantage.
So following your logic:
Advanced UI addons = wrecked difficulty in PVE
Advanced UI addons = cheaper motifs = wrecked economy
Advanced UI addons = players receive unfair advantage in PVP
Advanced UI addons = easier writ making = wrecked economy
Not one example you gave is relevant. None of them allow a player to play the game on auto for hours and reap any sort of benefit, ergo none of those are botting. also everyone can use those and not violate the game EULA. So if you are going to use the word logic actually try to employ it correctly because nothing you posted above makes a logically cogent or related argument.
Also I will trump your 1500 game play hours with over 4000 game play hours just listed on steam. I had the game well before steam offered it which I would guess I could claim 5000 hours, your play time means nothing. I have farmed WAY more than you.
MartiniDaniels wrote: »MartiniDaniels wrote: »MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
More bots = wrecked economy
More bots = more gold selling
More bots = players botting have unfair advantage
More bots = violating the EULA
More bots = players not botting giving up farming putting all resources farmed in the botting players control
More bots = making certain mobs and quests broke because mobs / area is farmed to where you cannot get a drop
Need I go on or do you wish to continue with your short sighted selfishness?
In ~1500 hours of gameplay, I saw just several bot trains.. i roam craglorn often killing those portals and nirncrux mines for fun, and i got fair share of mats from there. I don't see difference between bots and addons that provide additional info about what's going on, especially in pvp, but raid notifier is a joke too. I mean any person with this addon got "unfair" advantage.
So following your logic:
Advanced UI addons = wrecked difficulty in PVE
Advanced UI addons = cheaper motifs = wrecked economy
Advanced UI addons = players receive unfair advantage in PVP
Advanced UI addons = easier writ making = wrecked economy
Not one example you gave is relevant. None of them allow a player to play the game on auto for hours and reap any sort of benefit, ergo none of those are botting. also everyone can use those and not violate the game EULA. So if you are going to use the word logic actually try to employ it correctly because nothing you posted above makes a logically cogent or related argument.
Also I will trump your 1500 game play hours with over 4000 game play hours just listed on steam. I had the game well before steam offered it which I would guess I could claim 5000 hours, your play time means nothing. I have farmed WAY more than you.
Ok, so easy writ crafter which automatically presses buttons for you doesn't have same effect as bots? Lol
I'll report bots when I see them while I'm out and about but I don't like the auto-ignore feature simply because I always try to engage them in chat somehow. I usually visit certain areas frequently and will re-report daily - but I always call them out or whisper to them. I don't want to miss a response. I like to be as certain as possible that I'm actually reporting a bot and not just some RPer or something. *shrug*Caligamy_ESO wrote: »But did you try putting the bots on ignore?
"People will pay whatever if takes to buy one." < - then that's your problem, not bots. Botting only takes advantage of that. You literally just posted that no one would pay 5k for Kuta... but they would if that was the cheapest price out there, lolEmma_Overload wrote: »MartiniDaniels wrote: »More bots -> cheaper mats, what's the problem
Here's some reading for you.
TL;DR - Prices settle to what people are willing to pay for them, with or without bots. Removing bots won't ruin the economy or increase prices drastically.
LOL, please go back to school. There is no substitute for a gold mat in ESO economy - people will pay whatever it takes to buy one. I don't want to pay any more than necessary, and I'm guessing most other players don't, either.