Update 50 is now available for testing on the PTS! You can read the latest patch notes here: https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/categories/pts
Maintenance for the week of April 20:
• NA megaservers for patch maintenance – April 20, 3:00AM EDT (7:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 20, 7:00 UTC (3:00AM EDT) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
• NA megaservers for patch maintenance – April 20, 3:00AM EDT (7:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EDT (16:00 UTC)
• EU megaservers for patch maintenance – April 20, 7:00 UTC (3:00AM EDT) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EDT)
Would you be more inclined to PvP more if Alliance Rank was account wide instead of character bound?
Gariele
✭✭✭✭✭
During a discussion today about account wide achievements (i know beating a dead horse) it was brought up about PvP Ranks being based on the accounts total AP earned instead of the characters. Part of me thinks it would be amazing to be able to show time played altogether instead of having many characters with smaller ranks. But on the other hand it takes away from the ones that have grinded to GO and especially players with multiple GOs, Thoughts?
PC/EU
Winter Rose Autumn Rose Summer Rose Pacific Rose Midnight Rose
RoseESO Discord
RoseESO Website
Would you be more inclined to PvP more if Alliance Rank was account wide instead of character bound? 84 votes
Yes
33%
28 votes
No
50%
42 votes
Don't care
16%
14 votes
0
-
VaranisArano✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭No.
I'd be more inclined to PVP more often and with greater pleasure if the lag, bugs, glitches, exploits, and persistent performance issues were addressed.
When it comes to rank, I'm perfectly fine with my MagDK healer having a much higher rank than my much newer StamWarden. I have a lot more PVP experience on my MagDK and the rank reflects that.17 -
Kartalin✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭I don’t think it will change how much people participate in pvp if rank is account wide. I pvp because that’s the only thing in the game I enjoy on a regular basis outside of playing through new pve content just once.
In fact if something like that is implemented then once PVEers reach the necessary rank then would they never need to step foot in pvp ever again? If that’s the case can I have my undaunted rank account wide?
A compromise might be to have an account pvp rank for achievement purposes but keep each character’s displayed rank and skill unlocks based on the individual character.-
Tri-faction tryhard but mainly EP in Gray Host lately (PC/NA)
- DISCARNATE - Tertiary Meat - @ Kartalin - Youtube
2 -
Dojohoda✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭NoMy 2 coppers worth:
1. I don't like the idea of account wide PVP achievements. Each of my soldiers has its own rank and I like that. When a character ranks up, it gets a skill point and a tad bit more prestige in the alliance war. Making this account wide would devalue the system because it "hands out" all of that which was not earned to all of your characters.
2. As VaranisArano stated above, lag, bugs, glitches, exploits, and persistent performance are the main pain points. Those are the things that make people log out of cyrodiil.
Edited by Dojohoda on January 4, 2019 11:58PMFan of playing magblade since 2015. (PC NA)
Might be joking in comments.
-->(((Cyrodiil)))<--3 -
driosketch✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭NoPossibly have the opposite effect. I like the reward of a skill point each time I rank up an alternate character build, so I end up playing them more. It's something I've noticed in general about repeating content, from dungeons to events.Main: Drio Azul ~ DC, Redguard, Healer/Magicka Templar ~ NA-PC
●The Psijic Order●The Sidekick Order●Great House Hlaalu●Bal-Busters●0 -
Minnesinger✭✭✭✭✭
✭NoDuring a discussion today about account wide achievements (i know beating a dead horse) it was brought up about PvP Ranks being based on the accounts total AP earned instead of the characters. Part of me thinks it would be amazing to be able to show time played altogether instead of having many characters with smaller ranks. But on the other hand it takes away from the ones that have grinded to GO and especially players with multiple GOs, Thoughts?
Nope. There is more fun to gain ranks and not have to be target as a five star player.A is for Atronach.
B is for Bungler's Bane.
C is for Comberry.0 -
idk✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭Alliance rank should not be account wide as it should be limited to the alliance it was earned in.
I would have no issue if all AD characters on an account shared the rank or all EP characters, but not all characters across all alliances sharing the same rank. It does not make sense for a DC character to help increase the rank of an AD character.
In game design goes along with it not being account wide as we have siege that is limited to specific alliances and cannot be used by characters in a different alliance.3 -
Gariele✭✭✭✭✭YesAlliance rank should not be account wide as it should be limited to the alliance it was earned in.
I would have no issue if all AD characters on an account shared the rank or all EP characters, but not all characters across all alliances sharing the same rank. It does not make sense for a DC character to help increase the rank of an AD character.
In game design goes along with it not being account wide as we have siege that is limited to specific alliances and cannot be used by characters in a different alliance.
Oh this makes more sense, i like thisPC/EUWinter Rose Autumn Rose Summer Rose Pacific Rose Midnight RoseRoseESO DiscordRoseESO Website0 -
Derra✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭NoA compromise might be to have an account pvp rank for achievement purposes but keep each character’s displayed rank and skill unlocks based on the individual character.
So we can devalue the achievements even more than doubleap and bleakersfarming did? No thanks.<Noricum>
I live. I die. I live again.
Derra - DC - Sorc - AvA 50
Derrah - EP - Sorc - AvA 500 -
Ghostbane✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭NoUnless they are going to add 200 additional ranks, no.{★★★★★ · ★★★★★ · ★★ · ★★★★★}350m+ AP PC - EUAddons
AD :: Imported Waffles [37]EP :: Wee ee ee ee ee [16]DC :: Ghostbane's DK [16], Impending Loadscreen [12]PC - NA
AD :: Ghostbane [50], yer ma [43], Sir Humphrey Winterbottom 2.0 [18], robotic baby legs [18]EP :: Wee Mad Arthur [50], avast ye buttcrackz [49], Sir Horace Foghorn [27], Brother Ballbag [24], Scatman John [16]DC :: W T B Waffles [36], Morale Boost [30], W T F Waffles [17], Ghostbanë [15]RIPAD :: Sir Humphrey Winterbottom 1.0 [20]- AP Meter : All your AP needs
- Greyskull : Customisable, colour-coded Damage Meter
- Auto Research Scrolls : Automatic management of crafting research scrolls
- ITTs Donation Bot : Donation tracker for Guilds
- ITTs Roster Bot : Roster management for Guilds
1 -
Heimpai✭✭✭✭✭Don't careI have one almost ranked 32 and one almost 30, different alliance aswell...
I honestly don’t see the point? While you’re at it make it so you can only emp once per campaign0 -
Elsonso✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭NoNo.
It would make ESO PVP more pointless than it is today.XBox EU/NA:@ElsonsoJannus
PC NA/EU: @Elsonso
PSN NA/EU: @ElsonsoJannus
Total in-game hours: 11321
X/Twitter: ElsonsoJannus0 -
gabriebe✭✭✭✭✭If they make Mages Guild, Undaunted, Fighters Guild and Psijic accountwide too...Former Empresses: Saliva Bortschion (MagBlade), Janet From Finance (PvP MagSorc), Carla Swagan (Tank DK), Estelle Born (StamBlade), Enya Arsenal (MagPlar), Anita Nurse (Magplar Healer), Bearback Brigitte (Magden), Rachel Justice (MagDK), Nicole From Payroll (Stamden), Bailiff Belinda (PvE MagSorc), Féline Dion (StamDK), Septic Tank Tina (Necro Tank)
The runts: The Trolly Spirit (Tank Sorc), Floods-Your-Basement (Warden Healer) Dinah Asthma (Magcro), Total Top Tony (Stamcro)
The traitors: Janis Javelin (Stamplar, EP), Barbecue Becky (Magblade Healer, AD)
PvE: Gryphon Heart, Immortal Redeemer, Flawless Conqueror
GM: Animal Control2 -
redspecter23✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I'd be quite happy if the titles were account wide. Someone with the skill of a grand overlord is not suddenly as skilled as a volunteer just because they rolled a new toon. I'm fine with the skills being locked per character though. Unlocking the skills to rank 10 on 15 toons is feasable. Unlocking grand overlord on 15 toons is absolute madness.
It woudln't make me pvp any more or less, but it's a change I could agree with.0 -
mayasunrising✭✭✭✭✭NoNarp. Each of my characters' alliance ranks reflects how much blood that individual character has shed (theirs or enemies') for their faction. I consider alliance part of character development."And the day came when the risk to remain tight in a bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom." ♥ Anaïs Nin
“There’s a difference between wanting to be looked at and wanting to be seen." ♥ Amanda Palmer
“A game is an opportunity to focus our energy, with relentless optimism, at something we’re good at (or getting better at) and enjoy. In other words, gameplay is the direct emotional opposite of depression.” ♥ Jane McGonigal
“They'll tell you you're too loud, that you need to wait your turn and ask the right people for permission. Do it anyway." ♥ Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez0 -
Morgul667✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭VaranisArano wrote: »No.
I'd be more inclined to PVP more often and with greater pleasure if the lag, bugs, glitches, exploits, and persistent performance issues were addressed.
When it comes to rank, I'm perfectly fine with my MagDK healer having a much higher rank than my much newer StamWarden. I have a lot more PVP experience on my MagDK and the rank reflects that.
This1
