https://youtu.be/DsIz7L830KsFinally someone that has done their research. Anyone who thinks ANY of these sets are OP should try to get Doylemish to proc in PvP. Only potatoes will sit in your roots or not break stuns and just wait for you to charge up a slow heavy attack. It is very hard to kill a skilled player with that set. This build is one of those planets and stars must align things but it sure looks impressive when it works.Waffennacht wrote: »Lmfao, someone actually got Doyle off and you're just now gonna complain?
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Bad poorly researched alarmist nerf threads lead to unnecessary nerfs for very situational sets - Thread proof.
Op, I have never seen a more lazy post or argument on this forum except for the one in my signature. So walk me through your thought process, if there was one. What are the steps you took to determine this is OP OP?
- Watch a build video online.
- See a highlight reel of cherrypicked clips from a skilled player fighting PUGS in very niche situations where the build works well.
- Declare it OP and cry for nerfs on everything
Obviously this is a build video, the author is going to try and sell the build. Highlight reel will be cherrypicked wins against unskilled opponents.Finally someone that has done their research. Anyone who thinks ANY of these sets are OP should try to get Doylemish to proc in PvP. Only potatoes will sit in your roots or not break stuns and just wait for you to charge up a slow heavy attack. It is very hard to kill a skilled player with that set. This build is one of those planets and stars must align things but it sure looks impressive when it works.Waffennacht wrote: »Lmfao, someone actually got Doyle off and you're just now gonna complain?
Can you kill unskilled players on a health tank? Yes. Since Always. This isn't even the easiest way to do it.
This thread is bad and you should feel bad.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Bad poorly researched alarmist nerf threads lead to unnecessary nerfs for very situational sets - Thread proof.
Op, I have never seen a more lazy post or argument on this forum except for the one in my signature. So walk me through your thought process, if there was one. What are the steps you took to determine this is OP OP?
- Watch a build video online.
- See a highlight reel of cherrypicked clips from a skilled player fighting PUGS in very niche situations where the build works well.
- Declare it OP and cry for nerfs on everything
Obviously this is a build video, the author is going to try and sell the build. Highlight reel will be cherrypicked wins against unskilled opponents.Finally someone that has done their research. Anyone who thinks ANY of these sets are OP should try to get Doylemish to proc in PvP. Only potatoes will sit in your roots or not break stuns and just wait for you to charge up a slow heavy attack. It is very hard to kill a skilled player with that set. This build is one of those planets and stars must align things but it sure looks impressive when it works.Waffennacht wrote: »Lmfao, someone actually got Doyle off and you're just now gonna complain?
Can you kill unskilled players on a health tank? Yes. Since Always. This isn't even the easiest way to do it. But this actually looks like a fun original and creative non-meta build. So obviously we must nerf it to hell.
This thread is bad and you should feel bad.
Nothing new. Proc based tank wardens are present in the game since quite some time. There was a reason Arctic Blast had damage removed.
Zos has been informed about this type of build for ages but has done little about it.
@ZOS_RobGarrett said they are working to "codifying our vision and long-term strategy for combat". It must include a serious attempt to address builds like this if it is to become more than weak lip service like the other times they have said it is their vision.
Yolokin_Swagonborn wrote: »Bad poorly researched alarmist nerf threads lead to unnecessary nerfs for very situational sets - Thread proof.
Op, I have never seen a more lazy post or argument on this forum except for the one in my signature. So walk me through your thought process, if there was one. What are the steps you took to determine this is OP OP?
- Watch a build video online.
- See a highlight reel of cherrypicked clips from a skilled player fighting PUGS in very niche situations where the build works well.
- Declare it OP and cry for nerfs on everything
Obviously this is a build video, the author is going to try and sell the build. Highlight reel will be cherrypicked wins against unskilled opponents.Finally someone that has done their research. Anyone who thinks ANY of these sets are OP should try to get Doylemish to proc in PvP. Only potatoes will sit in your roots or not break stuns and just wait for you to charge up a slow heavy attack. It is very hard to kill a skilled player with that set. This build is one of those planets and stars must align things but it sure looks impressive when it works.Waffennacht wrote: »Lmfao, someone actually got Doyle off and you're just now gonna complain?
Can you kill unskilled players on a health tank? Yes. Since Always. This isn't even the easiest way to do it. But this actually looks like a fun original and creative non-meta build. So obviously we must nerf it to hell.
This thread is bad and you should feel bad.
The argument in your sig isnt always wrong.. Viper/selene/eternal hunt stamblade was OP, and everyone ran it. Everyone ran it because it was OP. Blackrose/viper/tremor was OP, and everyone ran it because it was OP.
Definitely not always the case, but sometimes it is. Good players who know the class and game that they are playing will usually come to the same conclusions about what is and isnt strong. And whats strong ends up getting passed around, and lots of people will run it.
A bit off topic i guess.. Regardless the OP is definitely misinformed. I can think of a lot more broken builds right now. Mainly due to the classes they are run on.. And im sure a lot of those players arent the best, but still procs hit very hard in no CP. This build is a pretty odd way to go about getting proc damage in an effective way, but i dont think anything needs to be nerfed.
I do agree that wardens are bad design though. Right now both stam and mag wardens, as well as magplars, are mostly what i see in pvp. Countless groups with the majority being wardens. There is a reason for that, but when you start asking for nerfs bad things usually happen.. Zos doesnt know how to test things over time with small changes.
Always a Vampire. PvP is nothing but them. I challenge people to NOT be one for a change.
Joosef_Kivikilpi wrote: »Always a Vampire. PvP is nothing but them. I challenge people to NOT be one for a change.
May Stendarr answer our prayers, brother. Seriously. Every time I see "vampire is necessary for the build" ... insta-uninterested in the build. Vamps need to be reworked so that entire builds don't rely on a couple of their abilities locked behind it. At least with werewolves, their abilities are only active during their transformation, which is something I can get behind.
ESO_Nightingale wrote: »Nothing new. Proc based tank wardens are present in the game since quite some time. There was a reason Arctic Blast had damage removed.
No. There was no reason to delete arctic blast's damage. It hurt PvE warden tanks from being able to apply minor maim. We have to use low chance skills to proc it where as Dragonknights have a skill that applies it instantly. If the problem is the immobilisation from wall of elements, i'd be glad to see it reworked away from a root. but blast didn't deserve that. not in a million years.
ESO_Nightingale wrote: »Nothing new. Proc based tank wardens are present in the game since quite some time. There was a reason Arctic Blast had damage removed.
No. There was no reason to delete arctic blast's damage. It hurt PvE warden tanks from being able to apply minor maim. We have to use low chance skills to proc it where as Dragonknights have a skill that applies it instantly. If the problem is the immobilisation from wall of elements, i'd be glad to see it reworked away from a root. but blast didn't deserve that. not in a million years.
That is Your opinion that there was no reason however many people (and few devs possibly) that was PvPing during the time when warden high health builds could stack dmg from both gripping shards and arctic blast have different opinion. Cripling shards still have a chance to apply minor main not mentioning about heroic slash. It's not like Arctic Blast had some guaranteed chance to apply minor maim it was just 3% per tick with already included warden passive 4% if using ice staff so yeah You were definietly applying minor maim like crazy with that.
You still have Gripping Shards that have excatly the same chance to apply minor maim as old Arctic Blast but procs dmg twice as often. Who even said in the 1st place that every tank is ment to apply AoE minor maim ? Fact that DK have it doesnt mean every tank from now on needs to have it. You want warden to be DK copy with ice animations instead of fire ? AoE minor maim is mostly used for trash anyway (for single target every tank is using heroic slash) and when it comes to trash mobs warden is the only class that can apply major maim through non ultimate ability - frozen device. If You really want AoE minor maim try thurvokun like many other tanks.