No. There are people from other countries that play on the NA server. You would be not allowing them to play with their friends or not allowing them to play at all. That is not fair.
However, locking a player to a certain alliance for a campaign might be okay.

Jake1576 wrote: »

I honestly can't take the score seriously in pvp with night capping being allowed and people being able to switch alliances to make one alliance overly populated so i think campaigns should have a lock out where you can't play in them until a certain time of day depending on the region you live plus it would probably make battlegrounds more populated and make faction lock a thing so alliances will mean something again and to stop one side from being over populated possibly and make scoring mean something right now all we get is extra purple jewelry if you're alliance wins the campaign that isn't a good enough reward for winning a campaign make it where if you're alliance wins the campaign the rewards we get are awesome ones like free crowns or crown crates or something like that would be cool

Did you hold your breath typing this or sth? Some dots and commas would be nice.

ChunkyCat wrote: »

Everyone should stop playing when you log off.

You're all figments of my mind, anyway

When you jump in to a campaign for the first time each campaign you should have to pick your alliance for that campaign, like mercenary rules.

From that point until campaign end all toons on that account should fight for that alliance. Outside of Cyrodiil alliance no longer matters so make us all mercenaries for hire.

This stops people who flip maps or change allegiances at the drop of a hat.

As lock time locking campaigns.... why? "OMG them Aussies are night capping.... in the middle of their day time. How dare they play the same game we do?"

Royaji wrote: »

Nightcapping should be solved through restricting population imbalances. Not time limiting campaigns.

The issue is a PvDooring 20man group against 5 guys on the other side. Not the fact that it happens during the night.

You seem to forget that the night in the US is the morning in the EU and the afternoon in Australia. There is nothing like nightcapping, only if you geoban everybody from the other megaserver - and Australians are left out completely in that case.

Somebody forgot timezones exist

Suggestions like this make sure this game doesnt move forward in pvp and isnt taken seriously. OP needs to look up how times zones work.

As far as picking an account wide faction for each campaign. That's not a bad idea but it has inherent flaws. I do suspect there would become a consensus faction that would just gain momentum until everybody was on one side for the win. With such a big decision of where to play for a whole month, people will communicate and load up on one side. Dont be naive.

The current bonuses allow the population to remain fluid so that the losing side is incentivized to play and if so it incentives people to leave their steamroll faction to gain more AP and help the losing side.. dont think thats a bad thing. If nothing else you should be asking for changes to the campaigns. Vivec seems to remain pretty balanced because there are people to balance it. The other campaigns with basically nobody on them are open for manipulation. Honestly they are a drag on PvP if ZoS cant figure out a way to get more people in them. Likely they need to cut out Sotha or Shor. Try to funnel the dwindling pvp population.

SaintSubwayy wrote: »

Locking campains for your account should definetly come first here. The relogging is way out of hand in cyro.

Ohh look blue has low pop ap boost, lets play with my blue here....srsly if you pick an alliance per campain you have to stick to it.

Almost. They push yellow north as much as possible and then relog to blue or red and push it back down. The blue-red border is usually very stable unless it is about emperor.

Not sure if account lock helps. ESO is free and you can have a 2nd account for free i think.

It is way to easy to outnumber and conquer. The NPC need a huge buff, so taking a keep is areal effort and a bit of a time investment.
For "causuals" it would be best if there was a KI General giving orders, similar to a chess program. This because there are people giving yellow orders that work for the red or blue side and casuals dont know the difference.

Wouldn’t this screw over people who just want to go buy stuff in IC like Hakeijo, or go grind telvar? And what about those of us with awful insomnia? I’m in central standard time zone, and there are days I’m up at 4 or 5 AM, unable to sleep, so i try to earn gladiator proofs, or putter around keeps repairing them for AP.

While I agree night capping is frustrating, it’s fun to pop in for off hours.

Most of those guys aren’t used to any resistance. Easy AP.

themaddaedra wrote: »

Jake1576 wrote: »

I honestly can't take the score seriously in pvp with night capping being allowed and people being able to switch alliances to make one alliance overly populated so i think campaigns should have a lock out where you can't play in them until a certain time of day depending on the region you live plus it would probably make battlegrounds more populated and make faction lock a thing so alliances will mean something again and to stop one side from being over populated possibly and make scoring mean something right now all we get is extra purple jewelry if you're alliance wins the campaign that isn't a good enough reward for winning a campaign make it where if you're alliance wins the campaign the rewards we get are awesome ones like free crowns or crown crates or something like that would be cool

Did you hold your breath typing this or sth? Some dots and commas would be nice.

I guess paragraphs would have killed him right quick.