and you don't have an answer, or your answer is "no" (as in - anyone wanna run a dungeon")...
do you reply in the negative? or just leave empty silence?
I find myself, lately, torn between the two - piping up with "No" or "I don't know" seems...well...not helpful. And it isn't, really. On the other hand, if there isn't a timely response in the positive, I wonder if whoever is asking would just like some mild acknowledgment that people actually *heard* the question, and would like any response, rather than just leaving cold silence to stare them in the face.
If someone else replies quickly, I usually don't think about it anymore - but if there's a big pile of empty silence, I debate whether or not the asker wouldn't like someone to respond at all, even if it's not all that helpful
keep in mind that I'm not talking about *sarcastic* responses to fill the silence - I *KNOW* those aren't helpful, and probably aren't appreciated in many cases.
so, I'm just curious - how do you feel? do you prefer any response, even if it's not a direct help to the question? or are you perfectly comfortable with silence if no one has the answer you need?
"There is no correct resolution; It's a test of character."
James T. Kirk