For context, the original dwarven spider mount was 3000 crowns.
Blinkums was 4000.
https://eso.mmo-fashion.com/chroma-blue-dwarven-spider-mount/
That was the special Chroma blue version. Starlock is referring to this one: https://eso.mmo-fashion.com/dwarven-spider-mount/
So, yes 3000 Crowns, or 100 Crown Gems.
With so many fantastic mounts available for gold, for little-effort achievements, from free crown crates (possible, I got 4 top mounts just by doing free crates), for twitch watching of E3 and other Bethesda shows, community Summerset efforts, Morrowind, now Indrik mount soon to be available...
.. and people STILL complain. Like, yeah, if it's expensive don't buy it. But you do get *plenty* of fantastic mounts for free.
Soundles1990 wrote: »Well the price is just too high for me . I rather go to a restaurant with my girlfriend for that money. 5-10 euros for a mount would have been okay .
Soundles1990 wrote: »Well the price is just too high for me . I rather go to a restaurant with my girlfriend for that money. 5-10 euros for a mount would have been okay .

Buyers set the prices in a free market. So who’s being greedy here?
I also got it there, pretty nice, so i don't an simple reskin, tend to buy Senche who match various Khajiits fur however but they are far cheaper
cecibergesnrb18_ESO wrote: »
Soundles1990 wrote: »3600 crowns for a reskin ?
you realize this game doesn't run on goodwill and handouts, ZOS is a business and needs to make money to keep the game going and chugging out updates, DLC's, and expansions. No Bucks No Buck Rogers
To keep driving Mercedes and living in mansions you mean? G R E E D.

Sadly, in the world we live in, the suits in charge of a corporation like ZOS lusting for a new mercedes and a better mansion and sustaining their life in excess is what drives them to hire the team to put out a game like ESO, since only the greedy glance at the expected profits is what makes them spend the investments that gets a game as involved as ESO to go from a concept to an actual game.There is reasonable, and there is outright capitalism, and excess.
Judas Helviaryn wrote: »Don't incorporate bugs into your builds, and you won't have [an] issue.
For everyone complaining about ZOS being greedy when it relates to prices in the crown store and, in this case, the reskinned mount. I present to you a situation that I was in years ago with a game I also loved playing.
The game was a subscription-based online MUD that charged $10/month. Game population was small --- probably around 300-400 active players near the end. EA bought it along with other games from Mythic Entertainment and decided it wasn't profitable enough to keep the server running so they shut it down with zero warning. One day we were questing and PvP-ing and shooting the breeze in chat, and the next day the client wouldn't load. Done.
Had they offered a cash shop for in-game cosmetics (generally in the form of item/spell renames since it was a text-based game) I'm sure many of us would have ponied up significant monies to keep the game online and operational. Many of us still communicate on Facebook and other social sites recalling the fun times we had, and how much we'd love to get our hands on the source code for that game to resurrect it.
Bottom line... If you enjoy playing this game and want to see it around for the foreseeable future, why complain what other people spend their money on? There's nobody forcing you to open your wallet (in the crown store) to stay competitive in this game. If your own vanity and lack of willpower prevents you from saying "no" to overpriced cosmetics, well then, that's on you, not ZOS.
Edit for clarification.
Bottom line... If you enjoy playing this game and want to see it around for the foreseeable future, why complain what other people spend their money on? There's nobody forcing you to open your wallet (in the crown store) to stay competitive in this game. If your own vanity and lack of willpower prevents you from saying "no" to overpriced cosmetics, well then, that's on you, not ZOS.
So... you are saying, encouraging people not to spend money on a game so it eventually gets shot down is somehow benefitting players as a whole???weedgenius wrote: »It's not an unworthy endeavor to encourage your peers to take on a behavior that you feel would benefit players as a whole.
And I for one would rather put my money where my mouth is and support a game I enjoy even through the occasional painfully overpriced purchase (still smarting about those couple outfit slots I bought before they were 50% off) then see the game suddenly go "poof" when some suits in a boardroom feel its not making them enough money anymore......decided it wasn't profitable enough to keep the server running so they shut it down with zero warning.
TheShadowScout wrote: »So... you are saying, encouraging people not to spend money on a game so it eventually gets shot down is somehow benefitting players as a whole???weedgenius wrote: »It's not an unworthy endeavor to encourage your peers to take on a behavior that you feel would benefit players as a whole.
Yeah, riiiiiiight...
...which as I tried to point out (maybe a bit too snarkily) a company can react to in two ways - either adjust their prices, or decide that "this mine is played out" and drop the game.weedgenius wrote: »Obviously I'm talking about encouraging players not to buy in at ludicrous mark ups so eventually adjusting their pricing policies...
...this is what determines their pricing policies.
Soundles1990 wrote: »3600 crowns for a reskin ?
you realize this game doesn't run on goodwill and handouts, ZOS is a business and needs to make money to keep the game going and chugging out updates, DLC's, and expansions. No Bucks No Buck Rogers
People realize this.
However there is a difference between reasonable price and price gouging which is a fine line that is different for everyone.
cecibergesnrb18_ESO wrote: »
TheShadowScout wrote: »...which as I tried to point out (maybe a bit too snarkily) a company can react to in two ways - either adjust their prices, or decide that "this mine is played out" and drop the game.weedgenius wrote: »Obviously I'm talking about encouraging players not to buy in at ludicrous mark ups so eventually adjusting their pricing policies...
Personally I would prefer them to have more reasonable prices myself, but I do look at other MMORPGs as well, and... well, at least ESO is not requiring you to buy the latest extra-special starship to stay competetive (cough, STO, cough). And the extra-special cosmetic stuff is just that... cosmetic.
Me, I would prefer to see less people go like "Don't buy from capitalists!" (and not only because I live in Austria and that sort of thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth thanks to the history my grandparents lived through) but instead see more people go like "I'd buy that too if it only was a -bit- cheaper..." to make the suits at ZOS put their greed to work for us in the hopes of gaining more profit...
Because as has been said:...this is what determines their pricing policies.
If they can expect twice the buyers, they can lower the price...
But for such "epeen" stuff like super-special limited mounts, the -rarity- is part of the draw that gets people buying it, and thus the inflated price actually works in their favor... so don't expect it to change.