Superhero1257b14_ESO wrote: »
Greg11jkalfa wrote: »I just don't want to be disappointed.
Greg11jkalfa wrote: »Has The Elder Scrolls Online already put the next major title to shame? And before anyone charges in saying things like: 'You do realize ESO is an MMO don't you', and 'We haven't even seen what TES 6 is going to be like yet', let me make myself clear. I just fear that the amount of customization and variety that The Elder Scrolls Online provides for players, will eclipse the amount in The Elder Scrolls 6, and make it feel lackluster. Skyrim released over 5 and a half years after oblivion, and while it made huge improvements to things like stealth, enchanting, and added crafting, it also failed in a lot of ways, i.e., you could only equip one ring, leg armor was instead attached to the chest piece, there were less armor, weapon, and clothing options, and the list goes on. I just don't want to be disappointed.
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.”
― Robert E. Howard
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Greg11jkalfa wrote: »
I'm speaking on behalf of the core game. Obviously mods give the other games an advantage. But that's not a fair comparison since ESO, as you said, can't provide them.
If you want to compare "base games" then:
Base Skyrim would have been the buggy unmodded unpatched piece of junk it was and the base game of ESO would have been the original buggy unpatched piece of crap it was.
Those are the base games.
If you want to compare "modded versions" then:
The modded versions for Skyrim would include all of its possible mods and the modded version of ESO would include all of the developer modifications (i.e. patches) that have happened since the base game.
Honestly, those are the only fair ways I can see comparing them but...
Mods aren't the work of the developer. They're fan projects. You can't use them to describe a game as being good or bad without being disingenuous.
Greg11jkalfa wrote: »
Superhero1257b14_ESO wrote: »
People have been saying this since release.
Next year will be the 5th anniversary of the release of Elder Scrolls Online.
So ... Yeah.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Witcher 3 put all TES titles to shame (it put all open world RPGs to shame). I hope that is the reason for the long development cycle: they want to release something that can compete with that masterpiece.
I really hope we get a game of that scale and scope with TES VI and not just Morrowind with upgraded graphics (which is what Oblivion and Skyrim were). The technology to create a much bigger, more immersive world is available today. There is no excuse for another cramped map with 30 NPCs.
Greg11jkalfa wrote: »I just don't want to be disappointed.
You should turn into a pessimist like me. Always expect the worst-case-scenario and you won't ever get disappointed. You will either be right (then you can brag about it), or you won't, in which case you will be pleasingly surprised.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Witcher 3 put all TES titles to shame (it put all open world RPGs to shame). I hope that is the reason for the long development cycle: they want to release something that can compete with that masterpiece.
I really hope we get a game of that scale and scope with TES VI and not just Morrowind with upgraded graphics (which is what Oblivion and Skyrim were). The technology to create a much bigger, more immersive world is available today. There is no excuse for another cramped map with 30 NPCs.
I have this small hope that they want to give us ALL of Tamriel and the Oblivion realms so that in future games, they can perhaps go to the otherwide of Nirn and give us something completely new and barely known about.