... The response also said that if I had an account name, they would investigate. The problem, as I explained to them, is that they are the only ones who can find out the at name, as there are no records of note changes available to players. I gave as much information as we could provide. It is now incumbent upon them to investigate, as they have proof of an offense, and to take action to prevent further harassment, which we would certainly do ourselves if only we could.
...
... The response also said that if I had an account name, they would investigate. The problem, as I explained to them, is that they are the only ones who can find out the at name, as there are no records of note changes available to players. I gave as much information as we could provide. It is now incumbent upon them to investigate, as they have proof of an offense, and to take action to prevent further harassment, which we would certainly do ourselves if only we could.
...
So if you knew who it was and were able to take action against, ZOS would be 'willing to investigate'
but since you are unable to identify who it was, zos is unwilling to investigate
Yeah, there is definitely a problem here -- either support does not comprehend the core of the issue, or support simply does not care that game systems can be exploited to anonymously harass others
The other day someone in my guild replaced an officer's note with a phrase that constitutes sexual harassment. Of course we immediately edited the perms so no one except officers has the ability to edit notes (because there is a glaring omission of an option to allow people to edit only their own notes, which would have precluded this mess), but the person apparently remains in guild because we cannot identify them.
Upon reporting this to Customer Support, with a screenshot of the note, I asked Support to let us know who had done this or (understanding their privacy concerns) that they simply remove the offender from guild, as we have no way of identifying the person unless they choose to confess, which has not happened. It's incredibly discomfiting to know we have this person in guild and cannot identify or remove them ourselves.
In their response, Support argued that they would never take any action on behalf of a guild master and that they would not investigate or remove anyone from guild because participating in guild is a "voluntary" activity and removing someone from guild would be "interfering." The response also said that if I had an account name, they would investigate. The problem, as I explained to them, is that they are the only ones who can find out the at name, as there are no records of note changes available to players. I gave as much information as we could provide. It is now incumbent upon them to investigate, as they have proof of an offense, and to take action to prevent further harassment, which we would certainly do ourselves if only we could.
I'm not sure how one justifies a complete lack of investigation and action here on the grounds that guild is a "voluntary" activity (isn't the whole game?) and that removing a sexual harasser from guild would be "interfering." It is hardly "interfering" with guild officers when those very officers have asked Support to find out what they cannot and to help them take action to protect their own safety. As for "voluntary," we have chosen to be in a guild, yes; we have most definitely not chosen to be sexually harassed. To hear Support suggest that they go hand in hand is sickening.
Incident #181006-000437
@ZOS_GinaBruno @ZOS_JessicaFolsom @ZOS_GaryA @ZOS_BillE @ZOS_MichaelServotte
lordrichter wrote: »Bad thing was said. Important part is that bad thing was removed.
Imperial_Voice wrote: »Id like to comment buuuut youd have to be a fool to comment here.
Imperial_Voice wrote: »Id like to comment buuuut youd have to be a fool to comment here.
lordrichter wrote: »Bad thing was said. Important part is that bad thing was removed.
That doesn't unsay it, or repair the feelings of any offended parties however. Just because something is gone, doesn't mean it can't still have lasting ramifications.
you've closed the exploit the troll was using, and rather than focus on the offender you might switch your frame of mind to the offended... send out a Guild message like a mission statement, "trolls will be eviscerated, common courtesy is not optional" kind of thing.we have chosen to be in a guild, yes; we have most definitely not chosen to be sexually harassed. To hear Support suggest that they go hand in hand is sickening.
lordrichter wrote: »lordrichter wrote: »Bad thing was said. Important part is that bad thing was removed.
That doesn't unsay it, or repair the feelings of any offended parties however. Just because something is gone, doesn't mean it can't still have lasting ramifications.
The hunt for the perp will not fix it, either. The question is how much ill will and hatred is the guild willing to spread around in the search for this person? When they are found, that won't fix it either. Not the original words, or everything that was said and done trying to find them. At what point do you just say "enough is enough" and let it go?
Edit: My recommendation is to let it go. It may never happen again, and that would be a good thing.