I would not expect a more reasonable answer from a such reasonable person who believes that shield breaker is balanced, LA oblivion dmg kills for EX-skyrim forum whineblade's pleasure and fun.
The answer was completely reasonable.
If cloak is to have a 1 sec cast time because shield has one, then it stands to reason if there is a potion that allows you to ignore cloak, there should be one that allows you to ignore shields.
...only if they either increase the cloaking time a LOT, or make it a toggle.Should NB Cloak have a 1 second cast time?
Even though im pretty sure this is a troll post because of shields..... No it shouldn't. It should have a cost increase like streak. The fact that it does not by now is mind boggling.
But cloak is comparable to streak not shields.
starkerealm wrote: »
You have CP to counter shields, 0 resistances on shield while i have to use a pot and waist precious resourses to find a cloak whineblade like you. So, wasting stamina-magica-health for 15 sec if you right before my eyes if perfectly reasonable.
You have CP to counter shields, 0 resistances on shield while i have to use a pot and waist precious resourses to find a cloak whineblade like you. So, wasting stamina-magica-health for 15 sec if you right before my eyes if perfectly reasonable.
If you think using a potion to counter cloak is a waste, then surely you would not mind adding a shield-ignoring potion.
After all, using it one would also "waist precious resourses".
And by the way, i was playing a "cloak whineblade" when this game released. In the meantime i've played pretty much everything except a shieldstacking sorc. So if you want to continue with the insults, i suggest changing the tune to something like "purge whineplar", since a stamplar is what i am playing right now.
