shaielzafine wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »shaielzafine wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »shaielzafine wrote: »I would pay zero dollars. This sounds like a money grab and you missed the option for not buying anything. I purchased the Imperial edition and regret it
I have 3 imperials, they are a great addition to my character portfolio. And yes, Shaiel, this is a money making suggestion for ZOS. I didnt put a 0 option for a reason.
For what reason then? Do you even know how to make a non biased poll?Unknown_Redemption wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »shaielzafine wrote: »I would pay zero dollars. This sounds like a money grab and you missed the option for not buying anything. I purchased the Imperial edition and regret it
I have 3 imperials, they are a great addition to my character portfolio. And yes, Shaiel, this is a money making suggestion for ZOS. I didnt put a 0 option for a reason.
Because you knew the 0 option would get the most votes.
Its got my vote, for sure.
This thread is for people who spend money on the crown store. Sorry.
As for your other replies implying that the people voting "no" to your biased poll don't buy things in the crown store, FYI I've spent at least $1700 USD on this game. This thread & use of the forums is absolutely for anyone that has this game. ANYONE who has ever bought a copy of ESO is a paying customer, not just people that spend extra on the crown store or people who have ESO+. ESO's business model is Buy To Play + ESO Subscription + Crown Store Cosmetics & Upgrades.
Your suggestion is a terrible rip off, especially when compared to other mmo games like WoW where they make extra races unlockable through playing the game as part of an expansion.
Games like Star Citizen will charge tens of thousands of dollars. In fact, I paid $27,000 for their bundle. See, I can use examples too.
So are you telling me you paid $27k for a bundle that includes extra races in Star Citizen? LOL. As far as I know, Star Citizen isn't even out yet. When is that MMO even going to be released?
And I was talking specifically about YOUR topic which was implementing extra races in an MMO. And I compared how an already existing game within the same genre as ESO has done that without putting it in their crown store. Plenty of people came back to play the new expansion with the new races and they incentivized leveling new toons, which means they made money since people bought the expansion and continue to sub as they play.
Nice way of ignoring the rest of what I said, by the way. Sounds like you went off topic and just wanted to mention how much money you spent on Star Citizen. Your poll is biased and isn't even in the correct section of the forums.
arasysb14_ESO wrote: »I would definitely pay for Ayleid, and adding diversity to lore is always a good thingSilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
That's what we know so far for Ayleids but there are Wild Elves with vibrant and secluded culture and those who possibly made it to Summerset and Direnni Island. They could really expand on these
Part of the reason why King Dynar’s story has the impact it does (without being too spolier heavy) is because he is the last.
You start filling Tamriel with Ayleids and you render that character arc pointless.
Why would you desire this?
Unknown_Redemption wrote: »arasysb14_ESO wrote: »I would definitely pay for Ayleid, and adding diversity to lore is always a good thingSilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
That's what we know so far for Ayleids but there are Wild Elves with vibrant and secluded culture and those who possibly made it to Summerset and Direnni Island. They could really expand on these
Part of the reason why King Dynar’s story has the impact it does (without being too spolier heavy) is because he is the last.
You start filling Tamriel with Ayleids and you render that character arc pointless.
Why would you desire this?
Because I did that quest 4 years ago.
VaranisArano wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Judas Helviaryn wrote: »I would not pay for such a sham. You missed a poll option.
Zero doesnt fit the pitch, Judas
That's how you make a biased poll.
Look at the thread title. It is not a valid option.
Duhhh because you didn't put it as an option, that way the ONLY votes you get are people willing to pay for this crap. Biased poll.
There should be an option where people are able to vote against it or else the data you're collecting is skewed from the get-go. Pointless waste of time.
Correct, this is a Crown Thread for people who buy stuff.
Except it isn’t, because a bunch of us can’t vote. “Buys stuff from crown store” =/= “buys anything and everything from the crown store.” We can and do boycott stupid crown store things we don’t like. Like crown soul gems (seriously, who buys that?). This would be on the big list of ‘no’ only worse than crown gems because it’s lore breaking. It’s bad enough we have this stupid Halloween crap in the game.
I buy the gems.
Why would you buy Crown Soul Gems? Just, why?
Unknown_Redemption wrote: »arasysb14_ESO wrote: »I would definitely pay for Ayleid, and adding diversity to lore is always a good thingSilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
That's what we know so far for Ayleids but there are Wild Elves with vibrant and secluded culture and those who possibly made it to Summerset and Direnni Island. They could really expand on these
Part of the reason why King Dynar’s story has the impact it does (without being too spolier heavy) is because he is the last.
You start filling Tamriel with Ayleids and you render that character arc pointless.
Why would you desire this?
Because I did that quest 4 years ago.
VaranisArano wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »arasysb14_ESO wrote: »I would definitely pay for Ayleid, and adding diversity to lore is always a good thingSilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
That's what we know so far for Ayleids but there are Wild Elves with vibrant and secluded culture and those who possibly made it to Summerset and Direnni Island. They could really expand on these
Part of the reason why King Dynar’s story has the impact it does (without being too spolier heavy) is because he is the last.
You start filling Tamriel with Ayleids and you render that character arc pointless.
Why would you desire this?
Because I did that quest 4 years ago.
Yeah, screw those new players doing the Main Quest for the first time! They don't deserve lore-driven character arcs that makes sense or to experience the emotional impact of Dynar being the last of his race.
/sarcasm
Again, I really don't understand the reasoning that leads people to throw out the lore in order to get cool things. Its sacrificing interesting story for shiny cosmetics. Ugh. One of the reasons ZOS still gets my money is because of the lore and the interesting stories.
Unknown_Redemption wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »arasysb14_ESO wrote: »I would definitely pay for Ayleid, and adding diversity to lore is always a good thingSilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
That's what we know so far for Ayleids but there are Wild Elves with vibrant and secluded culture and those who possibly made it to Summerset and Direnni Island. They could really expand on these
Part of the reason why King Dynar’s story has the impact it does (without being too spolier heavy) is because he is the last.
You start filling Tamriel with Ayleids and you render that character arc pointless.
Why would you desire this?
Because I did that quest 4 years ago.
Yeah, screw those new players doing the Main Quest for the first time! They don't deserve lore-driven character arcs that makes sense or to experience the emotional impact of Dynar being the last of his race.
/sarcasm
Again, I really don't understand the reasoning that leads people to throw out the lore in order to get cool things. Its sacrificing interesting story for shiny cosmetics. Ugh. One of the reasons ZOS still gets my money is because of the lore and the interesting stories.
Its not that big of an arc. lol
SilverIce58 wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »arasysb14_ESO wrote: »I would definitely pay for Ayleid, and adding diversity to lore is always a good thingSilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
That's what we know so far for Ayleids but there are Wild Elves with vibrant and secluded culture and those who possibly made it to Summerset and Direnni Island. They could really expand on these
Part of the reason why King Dynar’s story has the impact it does (without being too spolier heavy) is because he is the last.
You start filling Tamriel with Ayleids and you render that character arc pointless.
Why would you desire this?
Because I did that quest 4 years ago.
Yeah, screw those new players doing the Main Quest for the first time! They don't deserve lore-driven character arcs that makes sense or to experience the emotional impact of Dynar being the last of his race.
/sarcasm
Again, I really don't understand the reasoning that leads people to throw out the lore in order to get cool things. Its sacrificing interesting story for shiny cosmetics. Ugh. One of the reasons ZOS still gets my money is because of the lore and the interesting stories.
Its not that big of an arc. lol
So because it isn't "that big of an arc" means that King Lalorian Dynar doesn't get to keep his title of being the Last Ayleid?
Unknown_Redemption wrote: »
Unknown_Redemption wrote: »VaranisArano wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »arasysb14_ESO wrote: »I would definitely pay for Ayleid, and adding diversity to lore is always a good thingSilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
That's what we know so far for Ayleids but there are Wild Elves with vibrant and secluded culture and those who possibly made it to Summerset and Direnni Island. They could really expand on these
Part of the reason why King Dynar’s story has the impact it does (without being too spolier heavy) is because he is the last.
You start filling Tamriel with Ayleids and you render that character arc pointless.
Why would you desire this?
Because I did that quest 4 years ago.
Yeah, screw those new players doing the Main Quest for the first time! They don't deserve lore-driven character arcs that makes sense or to experience the emotional impact of Dynar being the last of his race.
/sarcasm
Again, I really don't understand the reasoning that leads people to throw out the lore in order to get cool things. Its sacrificing interesting story for shiny cosmetics. Ugh. One of the reasons ZOS still gets my money is because of the lore and the interesting stories.
Its not that big of an arc. lol
Sylvermynx wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »
There are quite a number of us in this thread who are not against Crowns at all. We are however against adding races without thought for lore. Apparently you have a hard time getting the distinction.
I think you'd do best to cut your losses. If you'd actually provided a "no" option, it would be leading the pack from the posts. Of course.... you didn't provide that option, because you knew very few people actually would be interested in this. You have a grand total of 28 votes covering some sort of "for".
I don't see your point really. And I can actually see the point in some of the most oddball proposals made in this forum, even when others don't.
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, perhaps you just wanted to pad your post count?
SilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
arasysb14_ESO wrote: »I would definitely pay for Ayleid, and adding diversity to lore is always a good thingSilverIce58 wrote: »All the Lilmothiit are dead. All the ayleid are gone (King Dynar is literally the last of the Ayleids). The Dwemer are all gone (except Yagrum).
That's what we know so far for Ayleids but there are Wild Elves with vibrant and secluded culture and those who possibly made it to Summerset and Direnni Island. They could really expand on these
Part of the reason why King Dynar’s story has the impact it does (without being too spolier heavy) is because he is the last.
You start filling Tamriel with Ayleids and you render that character arc pointless.
Why would you desire this?
In the wilds of most every province of Tamriel, descended philosophically if not directly from the original inhabitants of the land are the Ayleids, commonly called the Wild Elves. While three races of elven stock, Salache (or High), Boiche (or Wood), and Moriche (or Dark) have assimilated well to the new cultures of Tamriel, the Ayleids and their brethren have remained aloof of our civilization, preferring to practice the old ways far from the eyes of the world.
The Wild Elves speak a variation of Old Cyrodilic and not Tamrielic, separating themselves further even than their more urbanized Elven cousins. In temperament they are dark-spirited and taciturn, though they doubtless act differently with outsiders (or "Pellani" in their tongue) than within their own tribes. Indeed, one of the finest sages of the University of Gwilym was a civilized Ayleid elf, Tjurhane Fyrre (1E 2790 - 2E 227) whose published work on Wild Elves suggests a lively, vibrant culture. Fyrre is one of the very few Ayleids to speak freely on his people and religion, and even he said "the nature of the tribes of Ayleid are multi-hued, their personalities often wildly different from their neighbor tribes."
Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Crown Purchased Races:
The Crown store has been lacking on skins and polymorphs recently, and I wonder if it was because of their poor sales. Because of this, and with the introduction of Time Rifts tied in with the Psijic Order, I thought there might be a golden opportunity here.
I am suggesting that the forgotten races (and some still in existence) of Elder Scrolls be purchasable through the Crown Store, just as the Imperial race is. These new races do not require custom poly-skeletons as they can match to an existing structure; but these would have unique features, skins, and colors. Additionally, these new races could have unique combinations of passives; or simply copy existing templates (e.g. Lilmothiit would have the same passives as an Altmer ( Yes, a true furcaster ) or Alyeids would be the same as Redguards).
I believe this would be add a lot of diversity to the game, increase Crown revenue, and make a lot of people happy.
Examples of Poly-skeleton Cohesion:
Altmer:Khajiit:
- The Ayleids
- The Dwemer
Dunmer:
- The Lilmothiit
Breton:
- The Chimer
Argonian:
- The Akaviri
- Naga
Although 0 is not a poll option, ESO could grant races during special months of Daily Log Ins. Or, I could gift them to you
Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »
There are quite a number of us in this thread who are not against Crowns at all. We are however against adding races without thought for lore. Apparently you have a hard time getting the distinction.
I think you'd do best to cut your losses. If you'd actually provided a "no" option, it would be leading the pack from the posts. Of course.... you didn't provide that option, because you knew very few people actually would be interested in this. You have a grand total of 28 votes covering some sort of "for".
I don't see your point really. And I can actually see the point in some of the most oddball proposals made in this forum, even when others don't.
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, perhaps you just wanted to pad your post count?
No. This is a true suggestion, the races presented were just spitballed ideas. The poll, at the end of the day, should show ZOS that people are willing to pay for more races, whatever they may be.
imredneckson wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Crown Purchased Races:
The Crown store has been lacking on skins and polymorphs recently, and I wonder if it was because of their poor sales. Because of this, and with the introduction of Time Rifts tied in with the Psijic Order, I thought there might be a golden opportunity here.
I am suggesting that the forgotten races (and some still in existence) of Elder Scrolls be purchasable through the Crown Store, just as the Imperial race is. These new races do not require custom poly-skeletons as they can match to an existing structure; but these would have unique features, skins, and colors. Additionally, these new races could have unique combinations of passives; or simply copy existing templates (e.g. Lilmothiit would have the same passives as an Altmer ( Yes, a true furcaster ) or Alyeids would be the same as Redguards).
I believe this would be add a lot of diversity to the game, increase Crown revenue, and make a lot of people happy.
Examples of Poly-skeleton Cohesion:
Altmer:Khajiit:
- The Ayleids
- The Dwemer
Dunmer:
- The Lilmothiit
Breton:
- The Chimer
Argonian:
- The Akaviri
- Naga
Although 0 is not a poll option, ESO could grant races during special months of Daily Log Ins. Or, I could gift them to you
I just want to look cool. If its a good price and isn't pay2win then by all means add them to crown store
Sylvermynx wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »
There are quite a number of us in this thread who are not against Crowns at all. We are however against adding races without thought for lore. Apparently you have a hard time getting the distinction.
I think you'd do best to cut your losses. If you'd actually provided a "no" option, it would be leading the pack from the posts. Of course.... you didn't provide that option, because you knew very few people actually would be interested in this. You have a grand total of 28 votes covering some sort of "for".
I don't see your point really. And I can actually see the point in some of the most oddball proposals made in this forum, even when others don't.
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, perhaps you just wanted to pad your post count?
No. This is a true suggestion, the races presented were just spitballed ideas. The poll, at the end of the day, should show ZOS that people are willing to pay for more races, whatever they may be.
Well....
Twenty-nine people might be.
Xoelarasizerer wrote: »Tsaeci, Ka'Po'Tun, Tang Mo and Maormer: Maybe, yeah!
(especially if we push towards Akavir/Pyandonea at long last in the franchise at some point in the far off distant future of 20XX.)
Almost all of your ideas: LOLNothx.
Naga: maybe
Taleof2Cities wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »
I didnt put a 0 option for a reason.
Biased poll is biased then ...
Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »Sylvermynx wrote: »Unknown_Redemption wrote: »
There are quite a number of us in this thread who are not against Crowns at all. We are however against adding races without thought for lore. Apparently you have a hard time getting the distinction.
I think you'd do best to cut your losses. If you'd actually provided a "no" option, it would be leading the pack from the posts. Of course.... you didn't provide that option, because you knew very few people actually would be interested in this. You have a grand total of 28 votes covering some sort of "for".
I don't see your point really. And I can actually see the point in some of the most oddball proposals made in this forum, even when others don't.
Giving you the benefit of the doubt, perhaps you just wanted to pad your post count?
No. This is a true suggestion, the races presented were just spitballed ideas. The poll, at the end of the day, should show ZOS that people are willing to pay for more races, whatever they may be.
Well....
Twenty-nine people might be.
Im not here to be popular or for a psychological need to be praised, Sylv
Sylvermynx wrote: »You know, it's possible that TES VI (or later, if there is a later) might offer some DLC content with some of those races - which would of course be totally at the discretion of the player, since TES is a SPMR game series. In that case, that would be fine, because those of us who have lore issues with stuff (and in general aren't fond of "time warp" stuff or whatever mechanism might be chosen to account for extinct races becoming a thing) wouldn't have to deal with lore-breaking stuff in our single-player games.
But ESO? Where if you show up in Vivec on a Dwemer, I have to pretend I don't see you and then for some weird reason you message me about something?
No thanks.
generalmyrick wrote: »Id live something different. How about my altmer daddy had relations with my khajiit mommy and i get half of all their passives?