Maintenance for the week of February 23:
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – February 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – February 23, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
· [COMPLETE] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – February 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] NA megaservers for maintenance – February 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
· [COMPLETE] EU megaservers for maintenance – February 23, 9:00 UTC (4:00AM EST) - 17:00 UTC (12:00PM EST)
· [COMPLETE] ESO Store and Account System for maintenance – February 23, 4:00AM EST (9:00 UTC) - 12:00PM EST (17:00 UTC)
Every single player in pvp wants a *BATTLE ROYALE* mode
Ihatenightblades
✭✭✭✭✭
✭
✭
The thing is half the player on forums say no JUST BECAUSE THERES OTHER GAMES LIKE IT.
umm hello.... wanna know why there are other games that do it? Because its fun....but I found a way to make it possible without fortnite haters to cry on the forums with same talking points everytime. “Go play fortnite or
Pub g” no originality.
I found the solution for this. We can just call it FREE FOR ALL. That way you guys dont have to cry for nothing like all the players putting another game mode down that can help game. No wonder
Zos doesnt take pvp serious the community is a joke and is negative 100% of the time. Maybe change your ways and we can get more
Pvp game modes.
So i think calling it free for all would do the trick. A 20-30 man free for all would be awesome and we dont have to call it battle royale since so many people were crying about the name.
umm hello.... wanna know why there are other games that do it? Because its fun....but I found a way to make it possible without fortnite haters to cry on the forums with same talking points everytime. “Go play fortnite or
Pub g” no originality.
I found the solution for this. We can just call it FREE FOR ALL. That way you guys dont have to cry for nothing like all the players putting another game mode down that can help game. No wonder
Zos doesnt take pvp serious the community is a joke and is negative 100% of the time. Maybe change your ways and we can get more
Pvp game modes.
So i think calling it free for all would do the trick. A 20-30 man free for all would be awesome and we dont have to call it battle royale since so many people were crying about the name.
4
-
Ihatenightblades✭✭✭✭✭
✭THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »I can’t instantly tell you’re great at parties.
And why is that? Lol.0 -
Yolokin_Swagonborn✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I support this only if the map slowly shrinks and anyone standing outside of the circle gets the slaughter fish affect on them. Even if there is no water.10 -
starlizard70ub17_ESO✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭I don't want a free for all battle royal. So.... your theory about "Every single player in pvp" wanting it is wrong....
"We have found a cave, but I don't think there are warm fires and friendly faces inside."24 -
jaws343✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I PVP, I don't want this. The TTK is way to quick in this game to deal with Battle Royal.
Plus, let's get a non-team deathmatch mode in BGs before we worry about the FOTM pvp mode. I would much rather fight and die and respawn and fight some more, most kills wins. Rather than waiting 10 minutes in a queue only to be ganged up on by 4 players and die and have wasted 10 minutes for a 1 minute fight. Or even worse, facing an entire match of tanks who do zero damage and are only there to survive until the end.3 -
THEDKEXPERIENCE✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭Ihatenightblades wrote: »THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »I can’t instantly tell you’re great at parties.
And why is that? Lol.
Maybe it’s the gross generalizations, victim complex, random shots at people or bolding 2/3rds of your text.
Pro Tip: If you have a suggestion, suggest it. Don’t wrap your suggestion around a bunch of superfluous nonsense.
All you had to say was, “I believe a battle royal mode popularized by games such as Fortnite would be a good addition to ESO. Here are some reasons why ... (list reasons). Please discuss.”
It’s not that hard man.9 -
Tandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭The First Rule of Forums states that when a player claims to be speaking for everyone he is in fact speaking only for himself.8 -
Yolokin_Swagonborn✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭last man standing would have two perma tanks heavy attacking eachother7 -
Shezzarrine✭✭✭✭✭The reason the same arguments are brought up is because they make sense and you have nothing to refute them with. Just trying to invalidate them because they are repeated does not make your position correct, in fact it makes it weaker because you cannot think of a valid argument.0
-
I like the idea of a battle royale mode, but I have a few problems that would be a pretty big hindrance to a lot of people. The first and most glaring one is that it would have to be impossible to stealth. Otherwise, players would just hide and wait for the match to be pretty much over, while having no risk of getting killed. The problem with that is it would obviously hinder nightblades who use stealth in combat. So it would effectively have to close the door on an entire play style. Also ESO doesn't have any survival elements, so the overall mentality behind a battle royale game kind of falls flat - it's supposed to be about who is a better survivor and more resourceful with what they find available to them, but a battle royale in ESO would just be the highly skilled players with better gear hunting down the lower skilled players with worse gear, because they would bring it to the match with them.
The only way I can see something like this working is if it's a battleground "free for all" mode without permadeath. Otherwise, it could probably never be implemented right and no one would play it, and pretty soon we'd have people here on the forums complaining about long queue times for Battle Royale mode.0 -
Zelos✭✭✭✭✭Ihatenightblades wrote: »The thing is half the player on forums say no JUST BECAUSE THERES OTHER GAMES LIKE IT.
umm hello.... wanna know why there are other games that do it? Because its fun....but I found a way to make it possible without fortnite haters to cry on the forums with same talking points everytime. “Go play fortnite or
Pub g” no originality.
I found the solution for this. We can just call it FREE FOR ALL. That way you guys dont have to cry for nothing like all the players putting another game mode down that can help game. No wonder
Zos doesnt take pvp serious the community is a joke and is negative 100% of the time. Maybe change your ways and we can get more
Pvp game modes.
So i think calling it free for all would do the trick. A 20-30 man free for all would be awesome and we dont have to call it battle royale since so many people were crying about the name.
Free for all is alot different then battle royal, if you want battle royal in eso then fuckk off as its fuckking boring as all hell. I played battle royal back when it was a arma mod and now all you people get into it. I'm so tired of battle royal now. Free for all would be great just no battle royal shitt. What am I suppose to do find a bow and a great sword lying around?Edited by Zelos on July 24, 2018 5:51PMAeonhack - AD Stamina Nightblade - 5 Star General
CP1200
Creator and user of "Questionable" addons and game mechanics.1 -
kadar✭✭✭✭✭
✭Damn just make a suggestion... why wrap it in all the condescending, cynical, overly dramatic nonsense? It's actually not a bad idea in and of itself. Just state your opinion:
Look at how non-inflammatory that is.Ihatenightblades wrote: »The thing is half the player on forums say no JUST BECAUSE THERES OTHER GAMES LIKE IT.
umm hello.... wanna know why there are other games that do it? Because its fun....but I found a way to make it possible without fortnite haters to cry on the forums with same talking points everytime. “Go play fortnite or
Pub g” no originality.
I found the solution for this. We can just call it FREE FOR ALL. That way you guys dont have to cry for nothing like all the players putting another game mode down that can help game. No wonder
Zos doesnt take pvp serious the community is a joke and is negative 100% of the time. Maybe change your ways and we can get more
Pvp game modes.
So i think calling it free for all would do the trick. A 20-30 man free for all would be awesome and we dont have to call it battle royale since so many people were crying about the name.
5 -
ParaNostram✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
no"Your mistake is you begged for your life, not for mercy. I will show you there are many fates worse than death."
Para Nostram
Bosmer Sorceress
Witch of Evermore
"Death is a privilege that can be denied by it's learned scholars."
Order of the Black Worm1 -
Tandor✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭It beats me how the OP can claim everyone wants this when his own poll showed that only 18% wanted it in any form.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/426366/would-you-like-to-see-a-battle-royale-mode-im-eso#latest4 -
Wing✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭im a pvp player.
I don't want a battle royal mode.
title is false advertisement.
ninja lawyers deployed.ESO player since beta.
game got too disappointing.5 -
DenMoria✭✭✭✭✭
✭And how would scaling be handled for a Battle Royale? Or would it just be suspended so, in the long run, everyone who isn't ultra-elite, total Meta would be dead and the remaining folks would just sit around drinking and chatting about how AWESOME it was that everybody else was so pathetic?
Actually... that kind of makes me want it!1 -
Potenza✭✭✭✭✭Go ahead and request it, but don't say every pvp'er wants it. I am a pvp'er and do not want it.3 -
Kiralyn2000✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭It beats me how the OP can claim everyone wants this when his own poll showed that only 18% wanted it in any form.
https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/426366/would-you-like-to-see-a-battle-royale-mode-im-eso#latest
Which means, if his thread title is correct, that he thinks only 18% of players pvp!
1 -
VaranisArano✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I wouldn't play in a Battle Royale or Free-For-All.
However, I'd be fine if players wanted it or ZOS decided this was something they wanted to add (as long as it wasn't diverting resources from things like fixing Cyrodiil performance issues). I can accept that I won't be the target audience of everything ZOS adds.0 -
OGLezard✭✭✭✭✭
✭And then everyone runs sloads+skoria+bleeds. Such fun this mode would be....
No thanksEdited by OGLezard on July 24, 2018 6:09PM0 -
Vapirko✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭I’d try it. A handful of players would definitely dominate but it’s all good. I think a two person team battle royal might be better.0 -
AhPook_Is_Here✭✭✭✭✭
✭Ihatenightblades wrote: »The thing is half the player on forums say no JUST BECAUSE THERES OTHER GAMES LIKE IT.
umm hello.... wanna know why there are other games that do it? Because its fun....but I found a way to make it possible without fortnite haters to cry on the forums with same talking points everytime. “Go play fortnite or
Pub g” no originality.
I found the solution for this. We can just call it FREE FOR ALL. That way you guys dont have to cry for nothing like all the players putting another game mode down that can help game. No wonder
Zos doesnt take pvp serious the community is a joke and is negative 100% of the time. Maybe change your ways and we can get more
Pvp game modes.
So i think calling it free for all would do the trick. A 20-30 man free for all would be awesome and we dont have to call it battle royale since so many people were crying about the name.
Just going to point out that you keep making your polls here where the large majority say no, why not make a poll on the alliance war forums or the battleground/dueling forums and see if you get a more positive result?
What your doing is like someone posting about improving trials performance, drops and loot in the alliance war forum, people won't care there and they will likely be offended that you are taking up space on their sub-forum.“Whatever.”
-Unknown American1 -
AhPook_Is_Here✭✭✭✭✭
✭Ihatenightblades wrote: »THEDKEXPERIENCE wrote: »I can’t instantly tell you’re great at parties.
And why is that? Lol.
Because of your awesome perception of irony.“Whatever.”
-Unknown American2
This discussion has been closed.