My favorite line:
You agree that ZeniMax will not be liable for any interruption of the Services, delay or failure to perform, any loss of Content (including, but not limited to, User-Generated Content and Downloadable Content), and/or Account data (including, but not limited to, Character data) resulting from any causes whatsoever.
My favorite line:
You agree that ZeniMax will not be liable for any interruption of the Services, delay or failure to perform, any loss of Content (including, but not limited to, User-Generated Content and Downloadable Content), and/or Account data (including, but not limited to, Character data) resulting from any causes whatsoever.
Yeah that's a great one right there. It's like no one reads these or anything! And who ever skips one of these?!!
, stfu and stop creating new posts please.Except as prohibited by applicable law,
http://www.elearnenglishlanguage.com/blog/english-mistakes/should-have-vs-should-of/
THE PHRASE "SHOULD OF" DOESN'T EXIST!
i'm no native speaker, but this annoys me. but i agree to OT
My favorite line:
You agree that ZeniMax will not be liable for any interruption of the Services, delay or failure to perform, any loss of Content (including, but not limited to, User-Generated Content and Downloadable Content), and/or Account data (including, but not limited to, Character data) resulting from any causes whatsoever.
Yeah that's a great one right there. It's like no one reads these or anything! And who ever skips one of these?!!
I only read it during this most recent down time. I knew they had it covered, but just wanted to edumacate the non-edumacatable
i don't think people are just pissed by the downtime during prime time. I think they're more bothered by the lack of communication - ZOS must have known before early access even started that they were going to bring the servers down for maintenance just before official launch, but neglected to tell anyone until just before they brought the servers down.
What this demonstrates is a company completely inexperienced when it comes to online gaming. They have a great deal to learn in a very short period or they will haemorrhage customers.
The terms of service protect companies from being sued. It doesn't protect them from being deserted by their customers, and this is what they risk with every single amateurish stunt they pull.
Just like any signed contract, right?steveb16_ESO46 wrote: »ToS are legally meaningless drivel that mean nothing whatsoever.
steveb16_ESO46 wrote: »ToS are legally meaningless drivel that mean nothing whatsoever.
One of my favourite things about living in the EU, is that ToS do not apply if they would lessen your consumer rights. So you can simply click them away safe in the knowledge they usually are not worth the pixels they are written on.
Just like any signed contract, right?steveb16_ESO46 wrote: »ToS are legally meaningless drivel that mean nothing whatsoever.
Just like any signed contract, right?steveb16_ESO46 wrote: »ToS are legally meaningless drivel that mean nothing whatsoever.
steveb16_ESO46 wrote: »ToS are legally meaningless drivel that mean nothing whatsoever.
This.
You are pretty much extorted into agreeing to the ToS and EULA. You've already purchased your product, now they tell you the only way to use your product is to agree to their terms after the fact.
I know all game developers and OS developers do this, but its still shady.
Just like any signed contract, right?steveb16_ESO46 wrote: »ToS are legally meaningless drivel that mean nothing whatsoever.
Pretty much yes, in the EU anyway. Any contract that puts a consumer party in an unfair position cannot be enforced. B2B it's different, but not business to consumer. Basically, you cannot sign away your rights that are bestowed upon you by the state, even if you want to.
I would love for someone to try to "trump" the TOS with a consumer law in court. Just because there is a law out there that "might" apply to your situation. Unless Zenimax bends you over and begins sticking their *** in your ass, i don't think you have the rights that you think you do.
Just like any signed contract, right?steveb16_ESO46 wrote: »ToS are legally meaningless drivel that mean nothing whatsoever.
Pretty much yes, in the EU anyway. Any contract that puts a consumer party in an unfair position cannot be enforced. B2B it's different, but not business to consumer. Basically, you cannot sign away your rights that are bestowed upon you by the state, even if you want to.
I would love for someone to try to "trump" the TOS with a consumer law in court. Just because there is a law out there that "might" apply to your situation. Unless Zenimax, i don't think you have the rights that you think you do.
Just like any signed contract, right?steveb16_ESO46 wrote: »ToS are legally meaningless drivel that mean nothing whatsoever.
Pretty much yes, in the EU anyway. Any contract that puts a consumer party in an unfair position cannot be enforced. B2B it's different, but not business to consumer. Basically, you cannot sign away your rights that are bestowed upon you by the state, even if you want to.
I would love for someone to try to "trump" the TOS with a consumer law in court. Just because there is a law out there that "might" apply to your situation. Unless Zenimax bends you over and begins sticking their *** in your ass, i don't think you have the rights that you think you do.
I would love for someone to try to "trump" the TOS with a consumer law in court. Just because there is a law out there that "might" apply to your situation. Unless Zenimax bends you over and begins sticking their *** in your ass, i don't think you have the rights that you think you do.
Very easy in the UK, I am doing it right now with a photography company who breached contract (£1200). Small claims court, plus you can sue your credit card company as a joint party, so they tend to fight for you to protect themselves.
Not suggesting anyone does such a thing with Zeni (it's merely a case of see if they improve and if not then don't subscribe IMO), merely pointing out the facts. Its surprising how few people understand their rights and yet they are so easy to defend.
I would love for someone to try to "trump" the TOS with a consumer law in court. Just because there is a law out there that "might" apply to your situation. Unless Zenimax bends you over and begins sticking their *** in your ass, i don't think you have the rights that you think you do.
Very easy in the UK, I am doing it right now with a photography company who breached contract (£1200). Small claims court, plus you can sue your credit card company as a joint party, so they tend to fight for you to protect themselves.
Not suggesting anyone does such a thing with Zeni (it's merely a case of see if they improve and if not then don't subscribe IMO), merely pointing out the facts. Its surprising how few people understand their rights and yet they are so easy to defend.
I would love to be educated on this EU topic. Because you as a consumer are whining because the service provider has taken the service down to make necessary updates to improve the quality of the service they provide to you, they are opened to be "sued" for a refund or compensation... wow. I wish i lived there. I would sue Walmart for the bananas that have a brown spot on them. Your case is solid in the imaginary world of whining ***. Let me know how it turns out, or stop bitching if you don't plan on acting.