JPcrazysquirrel3 wrote: »Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Then enlighten us what you tried to achieve with your sassy "Found a Sorc main!" . Besides undermining the pov of players that don't jump the band wagon to bash sorcs. Which btw seems to be a trademark of many noobs in this forum.
Did he exaggerated in his post? Yes, he did. Does he still have a point? Yes, he does.
Was it alcast who cleared the new trail on vet hm with 7 magblades and 1 sorc in the group?
Is the floor higher on a magsorc (especially w/ pets) than on a magblade? Seems so, but the change to Grim Focus made it a lot easier for NBs.
Does the floor mean anything except for complete beginners to the class? No. The ceiling is far more imporant.
I'm far from a noob. And sorcs are definitely the strongest class in the game ability-wise. I agree with @gnarlyvandal , in that Sorcs are squishier than NBs, because Sorcs typically go all out damage, whereas NBs have more survivability with their abilities to steal health.
Also, @pieratsos has it right too. Don't really see "wrecking faces", more like just sitting back and using CCs and an overpowered execute to steal kills from the rest of his group members.
Tbqh, Sorcs as is should be the standard for balancing other classes. If they were brought up to the level of utility and flexibility Sorcs have, this game would probably be better balanced, class-wise.
I'm not bashing Sorcs by stating the fact that they are currently and have been for quite some time, the overall best class in the game. @kikkehs remark, on the otherhand was blatantly bashing a class, and if you're too blind to see that, then perhaps you hold some class prejudice as well.
JPcrazysquirrel3 wrote: »Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Then enlighten us what you tried to achieve with your sassy "Found a Sorc main!" . Besides undermining the pov of players that don't jump the band wagon to bash sorcs. Which btw seems to be a trademark of many noobs in this forum.
Did he exaggerated in his post? Yes, he did. Does he still have a point? Yes, he does.
Was it alcast who cleared the new trail on vet hm with 7 magblades and 1 sorc in the group?
Is the floor higher on a magsorc (especially w/ pets) than on a magblade? Seems so, but the change to Grim Focus made it a lot easier for NBs.
Does the floor mean anything except for complete beginners to the class? No. The ceiling is far more imporant.
I'm far from a noob. And sorcs are definitely the strongest class in the game ability-wise. I agree with @gnarlyvandal , in that Sorcs are squishier than NBs, because Sorcs typically go all out damage, whereas NBs have more survivability with their abilities to steal health.
Also, @pieratsos has it right too. Don't really see "wrecking faces", more like just sitting back and using CCs and an overpowered execute to steal kills from the rest of his group members.
Tbqh, Sorcs as is should be the standard for balancing other classes. If they were brought up to the level of utility and flexibility Sorcs have, this game would probably be better balanced, class-wise.
I'm not bashing Sorcs by stating the fact that they are currently and have been for quite some time, the overall best class in the game. @kikkehs remark, on the otherhand was blatantly bashing a class, and if you're too blind to see that, then perhaps you hold some class prejudice as well.
So telling the truth about a class is bashing a class. Cool! All of you can stop bashing magsorcs then, as you obviously have no clue what your talking about.
as said, as a new player: Magblade > Magsorc
as a decent player: Magblade > Magsorc
as a veteran player: Magblade > Magsorc
The ONLY specc that can be considered 'easy' is double pet builds, but who are you kidding? you wont raid with that!
And there are a few posts on the forum allready from all the 'new' players that got told to role a magsorc for easy life complaining about low DPS, low survivability, lack of controlled healing and tons more. But HEY! keep up your #Magsorc2Eze trend. as it only makes more crap players roll sorc, then complaining that the sorc is weak. So soon I bet magsorcs will be the new fotm again and take the reins of the magblade.
Class reps are just like our politicians. They promise mountains made of gold for us, but in the end, whenever they can they try to push their own agenda.
JPcrazysquirrel3 wrote: »Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Then enlighten us what you tried to achieve with your sassy "Found a Sorc main!" . Besides undermining the pov of players that don't jump the band wagon to bash sorcs. Which btw seems to be a trademark of many noobs in this forum.
Did he exaggerated in his post? Yes, he did. Does he still have a point? Yes, he does.
Was it alcast who cleared the new trail on vet hm with 7 magblades and 1 sorc in the group?
Is the floor higher on a magsorc (especially w/ pets) than on a magblade? Seems so, but the change to Grim Focus made it a lot easier for NBs.
Does the floor mean anything except for complete beginners to the class? No. The ceiling is far more imporant.
I'm far from a noob. And sorcs are definitely the strongest class in the game ability-wise. I agree with @gnarlyvandal , in that Sorcs are squishier than NBs, because Sorcs typically go all out damage, whereas NBs have more survivability with their abilities to steal health.
Also, @pieratsos has it right too. Don't really see "wrecking faces", more like just sitting back and using CCs and an overpowered execute to steal kills from the rest of his group members.
Tbqh, Sorcs as is should be the standard for balancing other classes. If they were brought up to the level of utility and flexibility Sorcs have, this game would probably be better balanced, class-wise.
I'm not bashing Sorcs by stating the fact that they are currently and have been for quite some time, the overall best class in the game. @kikkehs remark, on the otherhand was blatantly bashing a class, and if you're too blind to see that, then perhaps you hold some class prejudice as well.
JPcrazysquirrel3 wrote: »Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Then enlighten us what you tried to achieve with your sassy "Found a Sorc main!" . Besides undermining the pov of players that don't jump the band wagon to bash sorcs. Which btw seems to be a trademark of many noobs in this forum.
Did he exaggerated in his post? Yes, he did. Does he still have a point? Yes, he does.
Was it alcast who cleared the new trail on vet hm with 7 magblades and 1 sorc in the group?
Is the floor higher on a magsorc (especially w/ pets) than on a magblade? Seems so, but the change to Grim Focus made it a lot easier for NBs.
Does the floor mean anything except for complete beginners to the class? No. The ceiling is far more imporant.
I'm far from a noob. And sorcs are definitely the strongest class in the game ability-wise. I agree with @gnarlyvandal , in that Sorcs are squishier than NBs, because Sorcs typically go all out damage, whereas NBs have more survivability with their abilities to steal health.
Also, @pieratsos has it right too. Don't really see "wrecking faces", more like just sitting back and using CCs and an overpowered execute to steal kills from the rest of his group members.
Tbqh, Sorcs as is should be the standard for balancing other classes. If they were brought up to the level of utility and flexibility Sorcs have, this game would probably be better balanced, class-wise.
I'm not bashing Sorcs by stating the fact that they are currently and have been for quite some time, the overall best class in the game. @kikkehs remark, on the otherhand was blatantly bashing a class, and if you're too blind to see that, then perhaps you hold some class prejudice as well.
So telling the truth about a class is bashing a class. Cool! All of you can stop bashing magsorcs then, as you obviously have no clue what your talking about.
as said, as a new player: Magblade > Magsorc
as a decent player: Magblade > Magsorc
as a veteran player: Magblade > Magsorc
The ONLY specc that can be considered 'easy' is double pet builds, but who are you kidding? you wont raid with that!
And there are a few posts on the forum allready from all the 'new' players that got told to role a magsorc for easy life complaining about low DPS, low survivability, lack of controlled healing and tons more. But HEY! keep up your #Magsorc2Eze trend. as it only makes more crap players roll sorc, then complaining that the sorc is weak. So soon I bet magsorcs will be the new fotm again and take the reins of the magblade.
JPcrazysquirrel3 wrote: »Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Then enlighten us what you tried to achieve with your sassy "Found a Sorc main!" . Besides undermining the pov of players that don't jump the band wagon to bash sorcs. Which btw seems to be a trademark of many noobs in this forum.
Did he exaggerated in his post? Yes, he did. Does he still have a point? Yes, he does.
Was it alcast who cleared the new trail on vet hm with 7 magblades and 1 sorc in the group?
Is the floor higher on a magsorc (especially w/ pets) than on a magblade? Seems so, but the change to Grim Focus made it a lot easier for NBs.
Does the floor mean anything except for complete beginners to the class? No. The ceiling is far more imporant.
I'm far from a noob. And sorcs are definitely the strongest class in the game ability-wise. I agree with @gnarlyvandal , in that Sorcs are squishier than NBs, because Sorcs typically go all out damage, whereas NBs have more survivability with their abilities to steal health.
Also, @pieratsos has it right too. Don't really see "wrecking faces", more like just sitting back and using CCs and an overpowered execute to steal kills from the rest of his group members.
Tbqh, Sorcs as is should be the standard for balancing other classes. If they were brought up to the level of utility and flexibility Sorcs have, this game would probably be better balanced, class-wise.
I'm not bashing Sorcs by stating the fact that they are currently and have been for quite some time, the overall best class in the game. @kikkehs remark, on the otherhand was blatantly bashing a class, and if you're too blind to see that, then perhaps you hold some class prejudice as well.
So telling the truth about a class is bashing a class. Cool! All of you can stop bashing magsorcs then, as you obviously have no clue what your talking about.
as said, as a new player: Magblade > Magsorc
as a decent player: Magblade > Magsorc
as a veteran player: Magblade > Magsorc
The ONLY specc that can be considered 'easy' is double pet builds, but who are you kidding? you wont raid with that!
And there are a few posts on the forum allready from all the 'new' players that got told to role a magsorc for easy life complaining about low DPS, low survivability, lack of controlled healing and tons more. But HEY! keep up your #Magsorc2Eze trend. as it only makes more crap players roll sorc, then complaining that the sorc is weak. So soon I bet magsorcs will be the new fotm again and take the reins of the magblade.
Magsorc with one pet and double HA rota breaks 40k DPS easy, has absolutely no sustain issues and is basically unkillable. The only thing magblade is better at is single target DPS and what makes them preferable for trials is that they reach those numbers without the annoying pets. I do in fact see magblade as the veteran version of magsorc. Less survivability, less strong in trash fights, better for single target and trials.
edit: I mean I didn't even know what tab target was before I rolled a magblade. With magsorc you just kill everything at the same time by vaguely firing in the right direction.
JPcrazysquirrel3 wrote: »Chilly-McFreeze wrote: »Then enlighten us what you tried to achieve with your sassy "Found a Sorc main!" . Besides undermining the pov of players that don't jump the band wagon to bash sorcs. Which btw seems to be a trademark of many noobs in this forum.
Did he exaggerated in his post? Yes, he did. Does he still have a point? Yes, he does.
Was it alcast who cleared the new trail on vet hm with 7 magblades and 1 sorc in the group?
Is the floor higher on a magsorc (especially w/ pets) than on a magblade? Seems so, but the change to Grim Focus made it a lot easier for NBs.
Does the floor mean anything except for complete beginners to the class? No. The ceiling is far more imporant.
I'm far from a noob. And sorcs are definitely the strongest class in the game ability-wise. I agree with @gnarlyvandal , in that Sorcs are squishier than NBs, because Sorcs typically go all out damage, whereas NBs have more survivability with their abilities to steal health.
Also, @pieratsos has it right too. Don't really see "wrecking faces", more like just sitting back and using CCs and an overpowered execute to steal kills from the rest of his group members.
Tbqh, Sorcs as is should be the standard for balancing other classes. If they were brought up to the level of utility and flexibility Sorcs have, this game would probably be better balanced, class-wise.
I'm not bashing Sorcs by stating the fact that they are currently and have been for quite some time, the overall best class in the game. @kikkehs remark, on the otherhand was blatantly bashing a class, and if you're too blind to see that, then perhaps you hold some class prejudice as well.
So telling the truth about a class is bashing a class. Cool! All of you can stop bashing magsorcs then, as you obviously have no clue what your talking about.
as said, as a new player: Magblade > Magsorc
as a decent player: Magblade > Magsorc
as a veteran player: Magblade > Magsorc
The ONLY specc that can be considered 'easy' is double pet builds, but who are you kidding? you wont raid with that!
And there are a few posts on the forum allready from all the 'new' players that got told to role a magsorc for easy life complaining about low DPS, low survivability, lack of controlled healing and tons more. But HEY! keep up your #Magsorc2Eze trend. as it only makes more crap players roll sorc, then complaining that the sorc is weak. So soon I bet magsorcs will be the new fotm again and take the reins of the magblade.
Magsorc with one pet and double HA rota breaks 40k DPS easy, has absolutely no sustain issues and is basically unkillable. The only thing magblade is better at is single target DPS and what makes them preferable for trials is that they reach those numbers without the annoying pets. I do in fact see magblade as the veteran version of magsorc. Less survivability, less strong in trash fights, better for single target and trials.
edit: I mean I didn't even know what tab target was before I rolled a magblade. With magsorc you just kill everything at the same time by vaguely firing in the right direction.
Besides the tiny detail where pet sorc usually has to not use pets where it matters (last boss fights), could you please point me a video of this "double HA rota breaks 40k DPS easy"?
Also, considering magblade can break 50-60k, why would anyone want to take more than 1 sorc in any content?
Why world first Cloudrest clear involved ALL NBs except 1 sorc and not vice-versa? 1 sorc taken for the buffs, certainly not for the DPS! If sorcs are the ultimate class, shouldn't it be the contrary?
Last but not least, speaking of "trials survivability", magblades come with self healing embedded in their "rotation", whereas sorcs have exactly ZERO healing. Only ability that brings in healing and that is usually employed is Power Surge. It's used in 4 men and other low level content that does not matter.
Bigevilpeter wrote: »I played all classes magicka and stamina all geared up and end game content. The last class I got to unfortunately was the Magsorc and boy have I been missing out.
Not only is they damage insane and have access to almost all utilities, but they are also so durable with shields and can self heal just by doing damage.
I got the easiest no deaths runs yet and can so easily carry my teams.
Yeah mageblades can so more damage, but they are not as relaxing and carefree as Magsorcs
gnarlyvandal wrote: »‘Mages’ tend to be great at aoe dmg-ing groups of mobs, ‘rogues’ tend to be great at single target dmg, ‘tanks’ tend to have lower dmg but greater survivability and gap closers, ‘healers’ tend to sit back and group buff with the odd dmg here and there. From what I can see, eso is no different; yes any class can play as they like and in the overland for story content you’re not gimped in any way, but to be competitive in vet or against other players, this seems to be the comparison I’m seeing people complain about. It’s normal for these differences though right?
themaddaedra wrote: »All i see here is you being quite ignorant about the subject. There's basically no difference in magicka classes except for magblades having a trouble rotation, but they already get paid by insane damage so there's no point in it.
Everyone around like petsorc easy, petsorc easy well be my guess try to play petsorc in endgame content. First, nobody will want you, really. Everyone will try to stop you playing pet build. Then you can't use pets on Mage, Warrior, Serpent, Saint Olms due to mechanics. Not even counting bosses where you can play pets but they keep dying anyway. There are so few bosses where you can actually play petsorc, but even for those it's not viable because 2 heavy attacks in a rotation is not easy as you all think. Try to move and avoid stuff while doing that rotation precisely. That build is losing huge time on mobility.
Also there's this point that you don't have a spammable on that build. So changing focus is a huge problem. Let's say you are fighting Pinaccle Factotum and there's a conduit to kill. You will either do heavy attack on it or ignore it. Heavy attacking on a target makes your pets change target. And those targets just die even before your pet arrives so all you do is lose quite some damage on boss. Same happens on Commitee and Varlaiel all the time.
I played -i believe- every possible combination for pet builds and if you think it's easy mode just be my guess. It's more like calling petsorc easy is the easy mode these days.
For non-pet sorc, -i also played almost all possible non-pet combinations- i don't know how different it is from magplar or magdk.
Only thing i could agree is magblades having a harder rotation than others, but it only matters till you get used to it tbh. And you deal more damage than others once you do it, so fair enough imo.
Oreyn_Bearclaw wrote: »Sorcs are the easiest way to learn end game. They do 90% of the damage of nightblade with 50% of the effort. That said, sorcs don’t have great utility and are generally a poor choice against good players.
If your goal is to slaughter pugs and clear content the first time, admittedly, they are hard to beat. If you are looking to break leaderboards and take on the best players, look elsewhere.
themaddaedra wrote: »All i see here is you being quite ignorant about the subject. There's basically no difference in magicka classes except for magblades having a trouble rotation, but they already get paid by insane damage so there's no point in it.
Everyone around like petsorc easy, petsorc easy well be my guess try to play petsorc in endgame content. First, nobody will want you, really. Everyone will try to stop you playing pet build. Then you can't use pets on Mage, Warrior, Serpent, Saint Olms due to mechanics. Not even counting bosses where you can play pets but they keep dying anyway. There are so few bosses where you can actually play petsorc, but even for those it's not viable because 2 heavy attacks in a rotation is not easy as you all think. Try to move and avoid stuff while doing that rotation precisely. That build is losing huge time on mobility.
Also there's this point that you don't have a spammable on that build. So changing focus is a huge problem. Let's say you are fighting Pinaccle Factotum and there's a conduit to kill. You will either do heavy attack on it or ignore it. Heavy attacking on a target makes your pets change target. And those targets just die even before your pet arrives so all you do is lose quite some damage on boss. Same happens on Commitee and Varlaiel all the time.
I played -i believe- every possible combination for pet builds and if you think it's easy mode just be my guess. It's more like calling petsorc easy is the easy mode these days.
For non-pet sorc, -i also played almost all possible non-pet combinations- i don't know how different it is from magplar or magdk.
Only thing i could agree is magblades having a harder rotation than others, but it only matters till you get used to it tbh. And you deal more damage than others once you do it, so fair enough imo.
No...
Rune Cage
That's it
NB haters defending sorcs, should have known sorc was their main.
NerfSorcs.
Joy_Division wrote: »
If you think the stamblade's rotation is easy mode then your bias has completely blinded you beyond credibility. You yourself have admitted that you don't play as a stamblade so maybe you should avoid critiquing a class you're ignorant about.
/popcorn
This is quite an entertaining/informative read.
So let's say I have a magicka sorcerer and I'm wondering how much greener this "nightblade" grass is. I mean, I hate, hate, hate sorcerer pets and I'm not particularly keen on being a glass cannon. Can nightblades also solo content with ease? Will I find it every bit as rewarding if I only plan on playing trials on a more casual basis? Is AOE noticeably lesser than a sorcerer?
I came to a sorcerer thread and am asking nightblade questions. Have I been incepted?
Get a magblade and try it. I love mine and barely play my sorc since I have it. It's quite different from petsorc regarding playstyle. It's basically slow movement and massive AOE vs. agility and burst/single target (lightning vs. flame says it all actually). While sorcs are probably easier to solo stuff on, it gets much faster as a skilled magblade. Petsorc is super easy in vMA for instance but will you ever get a nice score with it?
It depends on what you want. But if you hate the pets you are in the same boat as me and will probably love the NB for it's mobility and independence.