Turelus wrote: »

I think there there was a magic fix to solve lag they would have done it already. They've been working on it where they can it seems.

Also in before "upgrade servers fixes everything in life"

A little transparency would have been nice.

Its one thing know that "Hey, ZOS says they dont have a magic bullet for the lag, loading screens, disconnects, bugs, and long-term exploits that are screwing up my PVP experience. Partly that's because they have to support a bunch of different computers, partly because of anti-cheating measures, and partly because they are working on exploit fixes but its very incremental work." (Which they explained was why the multicore took so long, I like this communication, ZOS, keep it up.)

Its a whole 'nother thing to have radio silence where its like "ZOS? You do realize we have lag, loading screens, disconnects, and long-term exploits that we haven't had any progress on for a year or more, right? ZOS? Are you doing anything? Or can you not fix it? Hello? Can anyone hear me?"

I'll be completely honest, I'm delighted that ZOS finally fixed the queue exploit for multi faction groups. But I knew about that exploit for a year before ZOS even really admitted it was happening and they had a solution and I had reported it several times. So I'm less than delighted with their response time on a major exploit that impacted the fairness of the vast majority of the campaigns I played in.

Bottom line, I understand that ZOS why likes to wait until they have a solution in hand before talking about and sometimes that takes a lot of time. But that long period of silence where I'm dealing with the problems and not hearing anything about fixes gets discouraging, especially when its happening on multiple issues. I've got jade-colored glasses now.

I'm hopeful about the new update, and I understand why the multicore changes are happening now and not a year ago. I love PVP and I'm willing to accept that loving Cyrodiil PVP means dealing with technical issues. But I don't like that playing in Cyrodiil does mean dealing with a host of technical issues, bugs, and still unfixed exploits. ZOS' poor communication and response time has jaded me, I absolutely admit that. That happens when obvious exploits like the queue bug go unaddressed for over a year.

Yea Zos needs to bring something new to Cyrodill. Incentive like Double AP Mayhem is great while the event lasts but after that, the populations are even worst than ever. We need new objectives, new rewards and we certainly need bug fixes.

Hell if the game is all about housing, then bring housing to cyrodill so RPers can come make some territory guild wars.

I just don't understand why they neglect PvP like that. In my book, in PvE, once you have the gear, there's nothing more to be done (unless you have an OCD). In PvP, there's always the fight to fight!

Damien_Uvirith wrote: »

All PvPers should take a break from Cyro, and instead duel each other en-mass in heavily trafficked PvE/RP zones. An empty Cyrodiil might urge ZoS to cater to the other half of the player base.

ZOS won't change much in PvP because they can't milk the players teets with micro-transactions. Unless they start charging crowns for- nevermind. I don't want to give ZOS any ideas.

ugh, unfortunately a relatively under used/populated imperial city hasn't motivated zos to make any positive changes...

eso pvp =


from its creators...