Still need to understand that the polls on here only represent the portion of the playerbase that is serious and hardcore enough about the game to come spend time on the forums. Need to understand that the vast majority of players are casual, and never visit any forums at all.
redspecter23 wrote: »I answered the second option but there really is a lot of difference between 1 and 2. No guild can every guarantee a guild trader every week. Even if they have had one every single week so far, any given week can end the streak. Although I have 2 guilds that bid on traders weekly and they very rarely lose (I've never had a week with no guild trader between them), I can't say that they will always have one.
Should also ask whether their traders are in prime locations, or elsewise. I mean, yeah, sure, Guild X ALWAYS has a guild trader... he's that guy in that one outpost in Cyrodiil... or, Glorgzorgo...
Should also ask whether their traders are in prime locations, or elsewise. I mean, yeah, sure, Guild X ALWAYS has a guild trader... he's that guy in that one outpost in Cyrodiil... or, Glorgzorgo...
That's a good point. I should make an effort to shop at the out of the way traders more often. It's been my experience in the past that players who sell out in the middle of nowhere tend to list items at a higher price than players in major cities. I think if those players listed their items at a lower price, more of a bargain, it would encourage more players to travel out of their way to buy. So even though they might lose some profit on the individual sale, they could actually end up selling more items and making more money by undercutting the major hub markets.
Is in two guilds who is trade guilds, one always have an trader in Rawl'kwa with one exception, second tend to have trader half the time in places like Orsinium, not in because of trader but because they are nice for dungeons and normal trial farming.redspecter23 wrote: »I answered the second option but there really is a lot of difference between 1 and 2. No guild can every guarantee a guild trader every week. Even if they have had one every single week so far, any given week can end the streak. Although I have 2 guilds that bid on traders weekly and they very rarely lose (I've never had a week with no guild trader between them), I can't say that they will always have one.
Yes. I am fortunate to be in a fantastic Trading Guild. Adore Angry Unicorn Traders.
Honest people. Great location for vendor. Voice chat (if desired. Not required)
Everyone has the opportunity for access. Some choose to not have access which is a personal decision.
Outside of that the poll and it's results are entertainment value and Zos understands that forum polls are for entertainment value. They are not statistically relevant due to their nature.
Everyone has the opportunity for access. Some choose to not have access which is a personal decision.
Outside of that the poll and it's results are entertainment value and Zos understands that forum polls are for entertainment value. They are not statistically relevant due to their nature.
You do realize that guilds have a cap of 500 members, and most members have more than one account in the same guilds, there are millions of players and only what 180 vendors in game?
180+500 = 90,000
3.5 million - 90,000 = 3.41 million without a trader, and even less if the guilds have multiple accounts by the same people.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Everyone has the opportunity for access. Some choose to not have access which is a personal decision.
Outside of that the poll and it's results are entertainment value and Zos understands that forum polls are for entertainment value. They are not statistically relevant due to their nature.
You do realize that guilds have a cap of 500 members, and most members have more than one account in the same guilds, there are millions of players and only what 180 vendors in game?
180+500 = 90,000
3.5 million - 90,000 = 3.41 million without a trader, and even less if the guilds have multiple accounts by the same people.
I have had multiple traders at different times in Rawl'kha (x2), Mournhold (x2), Belkarth (x3), Elden Root (x2), and Vivec City (x1).
Whenever a guild I'm in goes under I just type in zone chat of trader I want "LF X trade guild. Can do X amount of sales per week". 5 minutes later, I have an invite. You can also use your current guilds to gain access to other ones. A ton of my invites came from people I met in my current guilds. Every guild you're in will have multiple members that are in top trading guilds too.
If you don't put in the effort to find a trading guild, then you won't ever find one and you have only yourself to blame.
MLGProPlayer wrote: »Everyone has the opportunity for access. Some choose to not have access which is a personal decision.
Outside of that the poll and it's results are entertainment value and Zos understands that forum polls are for entertainment value. They are not statistically relevant due to their nature.
You do realize that guilds have a cap of 500 members, and most members have more than one account in the same guilds, there are millions of players and only what 180 vendors in game?
180+500 = 90,000
3.5 million - 90,000 = 3.41 million without a trader, and even less if the guilds have multiple accounts by the same people.
I have had multiple traders at different times in Rawl'kha (x2), Mournhold (x2), Belkarth (x3), Elden Root (x2), and Vivec City (x1).
Whenever a guild I'm in goes under I just type in zone chat of trader I want "LF X trade guild. Can do X amount of sales per week". 5 minutes later, I have an invite. You can also use your current guilds to gain access to other ones. A ton of my invites came from people I met in my current guilds. Every guild you're in will have multiple members that are in top trading guilds too.
If you don't put in the effort to find a trading guild, then you won't ever find one and you have only yourself to blame.
I don't blame anyone but the system they created, its failed since day 1.
Everyone has the opportunity for access. Some choose to not have access which is a personal decision.
Outside of that the poll and it's results are entertainment value and Zos understands that forum polls are for entertainment value. They are not statistically relevant due to their nature.
You do realize that guilds have a cap of 500 members, and most members have more than one account in the same guilds, there are millions of players and only what 180 vendors in game?
180+500 = 90,000
3.5 million - 90,000 = 3.41 million without a trader, and even less if the guilds have multiple accounts by the same people.
Everyone has the opportunity for access. Some choose to not have access which is a personal decision.
Outside of that the poll and it's results are entertainment value and Zos understands that forum polls are for entertainment value. They are not statistically relevant due to their nature.
You do realize that guilds have a cap of 500 members, and most members have more than one account in the same guilds, there are millions of players and only what 180 vendors in game?
180+500 = 90,000
3.5 million - 90,000 = 3.41 million without a trader, and even less if the guilds have multiple accounts by the same people.
Please do me a favor and provide the numbers to support what I placed in bold? That statement seems questionable. Most players I know do not have multiple accounts, though some do.
The rest of your numbers are incorrect also. Not a single number can be supported.
More than 180 guild traders.
There is not near an average of 3.5 million accounts sold per server which does not even get into active accounts which is all that matters.
Clearly we do not have the millions, even thousands, clamoring for trader access that would happen if anything near what you have stated was correct.
Everyone has the opportunity for access. Some choose to not have access which is a personal decision.
Outside of that the poll and it's results are entertainment value and Zos understands that forum polls are for entertainment value. They are not statistically relevant due to their nature.
You do realize that guilds have a cap of 500 members, and most members have more than one account in the same guilds, there are millions of players and only what 180 vendors in game?
180+500 = 90,000
3.5 million - 90,000 = 3.41 million without a trader, and even less if the guilds have multiple accounts by the same people.
Please do me a favor and provide the numbers to support what I placed in bold? That statement seems questionable. Most players I know do not have multiple accounts, though some do.
The rest of your numbers are incorrect also. Not a single number can be supported.
More than 180 guild traders.
There is not near an average of 3.5 million accounts sold per server which does not even get into active accounts which is all that matters.
Clearly we do not have the millions, even thousands, clamoring for trader access that would happen if anything near what you have stated was correct.
According to this site ESO has sold nearly 9m copies of the game accross all 3 platforms,
https://altarofgaming.com/all-mmos-sorted-by-population-2018/
Its not the amount of effort, it’s the consistency of the effort that has caused me issues. The system is very exclusionary toward casual players, imoIt just requires a tiny bit of effort.