Band Camp statements: To state "But this one time I saw X doing X... so that justifies X" Refers to the Band camp statement.
Coined by Maxwell
Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel, as @IndianaGeoff mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
Kiralyn2000 wrote: »Seems like an outgrowth of all the awful things that 'jock' type bullies would pull on the 'wimpy' kids in the locker room - many of which would, these days, be considered sexual assault. But yeah, same kind of muscle-head/fratbro/bully garbage that shows up in sports & fraternity hazing.
Why they think it's funny? Because they're immature manchildren who think that same kind of thing is amusing in real life? (Or because they're the ones getting bullied IRL, and online games is a way for them to get back for it?)
Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfTyv_Ahd9gPrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
We're talking about teabagging in this thread.
PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
We're talking about teabagging in this thread.
Yes and you ask why people think its funny, hence my comment...
PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
We're talking about teabagging in this thread.
PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
We're talking about teabagging in this thread.
The point he/she is making is that humor is subjective.
PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
We're talking about teabagging in this thread.
The point he/she is making is that humor is subjective.
PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
We're talking about teabagging in this thread.
The point he/she is making is that humor is subjective.
And my question is why do the people who think it's funny think it's funny? That's the whole point.
PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
We're talking about teabagging in this thread.
The point he/she is making is that humor is subjective.
And my question is why do the people who think it's funny think it's funny? That's the whole point.
Mate, you don't understand my point. Your very question cannot be answered because humor is subjective.
PrayingSeraph wrote: »PrayingSeraph wrote: »Don’t read too much into it. There are those who call it “sexual harassment” and get really upset when it happens to them, but really, teabagging is little more than an (admittedly immature) way to express dominance. People do it ironically as well. My first clear of vet Scalecaller Peak was with a PuG. It took us about 45 very frustrating minutes to defeat Zaan. We teabagged the HECK out of her when we finally defeated her. Funniest thing about it? Only the tank was a dude — the rest of us were ladies and technically had no, er, bags with which to tea.The only time I ever teabag in Cyrodiil is when a bomber tries to bomb and fails spectacularly. If people do it to me, I really don’t care. I used to care, and then I got a bit older and realized that getting upset over a taunt in an online video game is the very definition of a first world problem.
Very insightful, thank you. So I understand now that it is a way of expressing dominance. But why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep, as @IndianaGeoff and @DieAlteHexe mentioned? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting manuever)?
People do it because its funny mate...
Your reactions for example would be amusing to many
That's the whole question. Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
Why is anything funny? At its core this question can apply to any humour and therefor its a useless question.
We're talking about teabagging in this thread.
The point he/she is making is that humor is subjective.
And my question is why do the people who think it's funny think it's funny? That's the whole point.
How did "tea bagging" a character get started and why do people think it's funny? It seems very, very peculiar to me.
Why is teabagging "funnier" than /shovel or /sweep? If it's the player's reactions, then why is the reaction so much more severe for "teabagging" than /shovel or /sweep? What is it about teabagging that causes the funniness or the severe reaction?
If it's about expressing dominance, why is teabagging the go-to method of expressing dominance? Why not some other obnoxious maneuver, like /shovel or /sweep? Is the sexual nature of it part of the "dominance" concept (as with nonconsensual sex, which is viewed primarily as a dominance-asserting maneuver)?
When people tea bag me it hurts my feelings. I am a very sensitive person and I would like it if people would stop doing this to me. It makes me feel like I am being bullied.
Sometimes I will whisper the offender but then they just laugh at me.
When people tea bag me it hurts my feelings. I am a very sensitive person and I would like it if people would stop doing this to me. It makes me feel like I am being bullied.
Sometimes I will whisper the offender but then they just laugh at me.
Yeah, I kind of already knew this based on some of your responses in other threads.
The general rule of thumb when dealing with trolls: do the opposite of what you would usually do.
So if you would usually message the person and let them know it bothers you, don't do that. The troll is looking for that satisfaction, and they view it as positive feedback, encouraging them to troll further.
Remember, if someone is doing something explicitly ingame to hurt your feelings, most of the time it's either a troll or an arsehole.
Doesn't matter which, the same advice goes: don't feed them. Ignore, and move on.