As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup
As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup
As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup
As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup
You don't need the BEST setup (whatever that means) to be successful in the game.
What does BEST mean anyway?
Most DPS (or threat, or healing)? - How much is really required? How many ways can you build your toon to hit that mark?
What's more important, getting that extra 1 to 5%, or having fun with a build you figured out from the ground up?
There are no right or wrong answers here BTW....
Anotherone773 wrote: »ive done top tier raiding in many games over the years. Ive DPS, tanked, healed raids. I have yet to use a meta build to do any of it. And yes, as DPS ive been near the top of the group list, rarely below the top third of damage dealt. Meta is for people who need an instruction manual.
As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup
Though sometimes the numbers lie, especially if you like to do things differently than the meta-finders.
For example, there was a sorc that made a well fitted build and boosted the ability to dodge roll with streak for repositioning. There was also a magDK that used staffs that made all the DK mains lose their mind because they are stuck behind the meta mentality.
It's really about what you find fun and then getting the highest stats to support it. For example I abhor vampire in PvP, so I made a build that tries to do without it on my magplar. It may not 1vx tater-tots like a stamina build, but in BGs it doesn't need to do that, it's fine there. And BGs I find the most fun/balance for PvP.
As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup
Though sometimes the numbers lie, especially if you like to do things differently than the meta-finders.
For example, there was a sorc that made a well fitted build and boosted the ability to dodge roll with streak for repositioning. There was also a magDK that used staffs that made all the DK mains lose their mind because they are stuck behind the meta mentality.
It's really about what you find fun and then getting the highest stats to support it. For example I abhor vampire in PvP, so I made a build that tries to do without it on my magplar. It may not 1vx tater-tots like a stamina build, but in BGs it doesn't need to do that, it's fine there. And BGs I find the most fun/balance for PvP.
I'm working on a stamplar that does not use jabs
However if you're looking to maximise your characters abilities you're going to end up in the same basic build area as those guides.If you can read the skill descriptions and use common sense, it really isn't that hard to get right.
As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup
Anotherone773 wrote: »ive done top tier raiding in many games over the years. Ive DPS, tanked, healed raids. I have yet to use a meta build to do any of it. And yes, as DPS ive been near the top of the group list, rarely below the top third of damage dealt. Meta is for people who need an instruction manual.
You do 10k dps on the 3mil dummy, and claim that adding DoTs to your rotation brings your dps down.
Please get off your high horse.
As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup
Though sometimes the numbers lie, especially if you like to do things differently than the meta-finders.
For example, there was a sorc that made a well fitted build and boosted the ability to dodge roll with streak for repositioning. There was also a magDK that used staffs that made all the DK mains lose their mind because they are stuck behind the meta mentality.
It's really about what you find fun and then getting the highest stats to support it. For example I abhor vampire in PvP, so I made a build that tries to do without it on my magplar. It may not 1vx tater-tots like a stamina build, but in BGs it doesn't need to do that, it's fine there. And BGs I find the most fun/balance for PvP.
I'm working on a stamplar that does not use jabs
You'll have more fun than a magplar trying to do the same lol.
If you can read the skill descriptions and use common sense, it really isn't that hard to get right.
Anotherone773 wrote: »Anotherone773 wrote: »ive done top tier raiding in many games over the years. Ive DPS, tanked, healed raids. I have yet to use a meta build to do any of it. And yes, as DPS ive been near the top of the group list, rarely below the top third of damage dealt. Meta is for people who need an instruction manual.
You do 10k dps on the 3mil dummy, and claim that adding DoTs to your rotation brings your dps down.
Please get off your high horse.
Dont be upset because you need an instruction manual to do decent DPS. Also stop taking my posts out of context. The context of my post was this( in relation to "can i do good dps without a bunch of skills"):
I do 10k on a dummy on a trash character that isnt even built for combat using 2 skills and normal attacks using arguably the worse(main) weapon in the game. This trash character is a support character for my other characters. Master Crafter, thief, assassin, gather, fisherman, and other nonsense. He only uses 1 weapon and has less than 300 CP.
Anotherone773 wrote: »And yes i can achieve better dps without all the nonsense. If you need an instruction manual and a 20 button rotation to achieve decent dps, thats your problem. I dont. Rotations are for people who dont know how to play. Skills are situational and a combat environment dictates different skills are needed at different times. Rotations are for people who dont understand what skill is needed when, so the best way to teach them to be functional in a group is give them an instructional manual and sear it into their brain.
Anotherone773 wrote: »So go ahead and sit on your pedestal, and watch youtube videos, read articles, and spend hours shooting at dummy. Meanwhile, ill play the game. But dont act all superior with me because i dont play like you. I dont NEED to play like you. I use the most effective skills at the most effective times based on the situation. THAT is how i can still achieve good numbers without rotations, instruction manuals, videos, and dummy practice.
Anotherone773 wrote: »I bolded the important part for you since it seems to go over your head.
Anotherone773 wrote: »Protip: play a hardcore pvp game for a few years, where rotations dont work and you have to constantly react to humans instead of AI's in combat and you will learn to play like me, and you will toss meta BS out the window.
Anotherone773 wrote: »Anotherone773 wrote: »ive done top tier raiding in many games over the years. Ive DPS, tanked, healed raids. I have yet to use a meta build to do any of it. And yes, as DPS ive been near the top of the group list, rarely below the top third of damage dealt. Meta is for people who need an instruction manual.
You do 10k dps on the 3mil dummy, and claim that adding DoTs to your rotation brings your dps down.
Please get off your high horse.
Dont be upset because you need an instruction manual to do decent DPS. Also stop taking my posts out of context. The context of my post was this( in relation to "can i do good dps without a bunch of skills"):
I do 10k on a dummy on a trash character that isnt even built for combat using 2 skills and normal attacks using arguably the worse(main) weapon in the game. This trash character is a support character for my other characters. Master Crafter, thief, assassin, gather, fisherman, and other nonsense. He only uses 1 weapon and has less than 300 CP.
Seem to have hit a nerve, haven't we?
Yes, let's talk about that context, shall we? 10k dps aside, you state specifically in that post that adding DoTs to your rotation lowers your dps, which doesn't even make any logical sense. Many people have since corrected you and called you out on your BS.Anotherone773 wrote: »And yes i can achieve better dps without all the nonsense. If you need an instruction manual and a 20 button rotation to achieve decent dps, thats your problem. I dont. Rotations are for people who dont know how to play. Skills are situational and a combat environment dictates different skills are needed at different times. Rotations are for people who dont understand what skill is needed when, so the best way to teach them to be functional in a group is give them an instructional manual and sear it into their brain.
You seem to bank a lot of your argument on the claim that you deal more dps than people who learn and practice their rotations. Please, enlighten us and post some screenshots of your combat metrics parses.
You've got it all turned around. Rotations are for people who understand exactly what skill is needed when, and find the timing and placement for each skill to get optimal results.Anotherone773 wrote: »So go ahead and sit on your pedestal, and watch youtube videos, read articles, and spend hours shooting at dummy. Meanwhile, ill play the game. But dont act all superior with me because i dont play like you. I dont NEED to play like you. I use the most effective skills at the most effective times based on the situation. THAT is how i can still achieve good numbers without rotations, instruction manuals, videos, and dummy practice.
Did you really just say the equivalent of "Yeah, well I'm rubber and you're glue"?
You are the one who stated, and I quote, that "Meta is for people who need an instruction manual". How is it that I am the one who is on a pedestal when you literally tried to degrade anyone who follows the meta or who practices their rotations?Anotherone773 wrote: »I bolded the important part for you since it seems to go over your head.
Thanks, but that's not even the important part of your argument. 10k dps wasn't even the real issue. Your absurd claims in reference to DoTs were.Anotherone773 wrote: »Protip: play a hardcore pvp game for a few years, where rotations dont work and you have to constantly react to humans instead of AI's in combat and you will learn to play like me, and you will toss meta BS out the window.
What was this about a pedestal?
I've played my fair share of PvP games of different genres (MOBAs, FPS, MMOs), but thank you for assuming that I don't know anything except rotations.
Also, your experience in PvP (or even PvE) in other games is entirely irrelevant to performing well in PvE in this game. Like I said in my previous post, if you are able to pull decent dps, no one will really care about your build. But you must be able to pull those numbers.
Anotherone773 wrote: »Anotherone773 wrote: »Anotherone773 wrote: »ive done top tier raiding in many games over the years. Ive DPS, tanked, healed raids. I have yet to use a meta build to do any of it. And yes, as DPS ive been near the top of the group list, rarely below the top third of damage dealt. Meta is for people who need an instruction manual.
You do 10k dps on the 3mil dummy, and claim that adding DoTs to your rotation brings your dps down.
Please get off your high horse.
Dont be upset because you need an instruction manual to do decent DPS. Also stop taking my posts out of context. The context of my post was this( in relation to "can i do good dps without a bunch of skills"):
I do 10k on a dummy on a trash character that isnt even built for combat using 2 skills and normal attacks using arguably the worse(main) weapon in the game. This trash character is a support character for my other characters. Master Crafter, thief, assassin, gather, fisherman, and other nonsense. He only uses 1 weapon and has less than 300 CP.
Seem to have hit a nerve, haven't we?
Yes, let's talk about that context, shall we? 10k dps aside, you state specifically in that post that adding DoTs to your rotation lowers your dps, which doesn't even make any logical sense. Many people have since corrected you and called you out on your BS.Anotherone773 wrote: »And yes i can achieve better dps without all the nonsense. If you need an instruction manual and a 20 button rotation to achieve decent dps, thats your problem. I dont. Rotations are for people who dont know how to play. Skills are situational and a combat environment dictates different skills are needed at different times. Rotations are for people who dont understand what skill is needed when, so the best way to teach them to be functional in a group is give them an instructional manual and sear it into their brain.
You seem to bank a lot of your argument on the claim that you deal more dps than people who learn and practice their rotations. Please, enlighten us and post some screenshots of your combat metrics parses.
You've got it all turned around. Rotations are for people who understand exactly what skill is needed when, and find the timing and placement for each skill to get optimal results.Anotherone773 wrote: »So go ahead and sit on your pedestal, and watch youtube videos, read articles, and spend hours shooting at dummy. Meanwhile, ill play the game. But dont act all superior with me because i dont play like you. I dont NEED to play like you. I use the most effective skills at the most effective times based on the situation. THAT is how i can still achieve good numbers without rotations, instruction manuals, videos, and dummy practice.
Did you really just say the equivalent of "Yeah, well I'm rubber and you're glue"?
You are the one who stated, and I quote, that "Meta is for people who need an instruction manual". How is it that I am the one who is on a pedestal when you literally tried to degrade anyone who follows the meta or who practices their rotations?Anotherone773 wrote: »I bolded the important part for you since it seems to go over your head.
Thanks, but that's not even the important part of your argument. 10k dps wasn't even the real issue. Your absurd claims in reference to DoTs were.Anotherone773 wrote: »Protip: play a hardcore pvp game for a few years, where rotations dont work and you have to constantly react to humans instead of AI's in combat and you will learn to play like me, and you will toss meta BS out the window.
What was this about a pedestal?
I've played my fair share of PvP games of different genres (MOBAs, FPS, MMOs), but thank you for assuming that I don't know anything except rotations.
Also, your experience in PvP (or even PvE) in other games is entirely irrelevant to performing well in PvE in this game. Like I said in my previous post, if you are able to pull decent dps, no one will really care about your build. But you must be able to pull those numbers.
I honestly dont care what your issues are. If you cant accept i can do just fine without all the meta nonsense, that is your problem.If you dont like my opinions, that is also your problem. However, if you keep trying to bait me into arguing with you about another topic from a different thread, i will report you for baiting and harassment. How you like those numbers?
My qualms are with you essentially calling anyone who takes the time to learn their builds and rotations mentally handicapped, especially since these accusations are completely and utterly baseless and couldn't be further from the truth.
I dont need evidence to back up my claims. i dont need to record a bunch of videos for you for proof. I honestly could care less. Someone asks for opinions, i gave mine. Most people understand you take peoples opinions at face value. I cannot help if you need scientific proof of everything.Im not writing you a thesis on my opinion, so you feel better.I also take issue with you stating claims without any actual evidence to back them up, anecdotal or otherwise.
The difference between me and you is my opinions are about a mentality and playstyle( elitist and meta, respectively). You actually bash and attempt to discredit other peoples opinions. Its a big difference. Im attacking a general mentality and playstyle. You are actually attacking people and their opinions when they dont agree with you. In fact you go as far as to carry it into another thread which is exactly what you did here, likely because i didnt respond to you in the other thread and you feel the need to be confrontational and "win" and you cant win something im not participating in.The exact same can be said to you; if you don't like my opinions, that's your problem.
I'm not afraid of you reporting my posts; I haven't bashed/flamed or, much to your chagrin I'm sure, baited at all. I'm sorry I can't say the same for you.
But what if I don't enjoy theory crafting or don't have the time for it? Maybe I enjoy the game by performing at my absolute maximum and meta builds work perfectly for me to accomplish that. This is a big game and people enjoy different aspects of it.
As much as I agree and enjoy to do just that, if you want to be competitive, be it pve or pvp, there is and always will be a "meta".
It's just the nature of games. Some min maxing stat cruncher is gonna run the numbers and figure out what's the "best" setup