dwemer_paleologist wrote: »i led you guys to the truth and showed video proof including advice on how to handle the situation.
that shield breaker set is no threat to you.
all it does is balance the fight when you guys shield stack.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »people are having Loads of fun right now
Listen, if go to cryodiil right now you will see all classes fighting fairly, no class greater then another, they all dying and killing each other at same pace
if you don't believe me then go to cryodiil main campaign where i am at just watch the fights.
you will see that its just about perfect balance in classes.
forget about this set and trying to do the devs job, the work is allready done
come join the fun, come cryodiil.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »people are having Loads of fun right now
Listen, if go to cryodiil right now you will see all classes fighting fairly, no class greater then another, they all dying and killing each other at same pace
if you don't believe me then go to cryodiil main campaign where i am at just watch the fights.
you will see that its just about perfect balance in classes.
forget about this set and trying to do the devs job, the work is allready done
come join the fun, come cryodiil.
How a sorc kill people, can u tell me please ?
rimmidimdim wrote: »rimmidimdim wrote: »Malamar1229 wrote: »Unfadingsilence wrote: »100% L2P post here people just move on...
BTW I love when a sorc is getting hit with SB and what do they do?? Stack more shields.... smh like come on STOP STACKING SHIELDS!! put pressure on the kid using SB if that's his only way of killing you then just put pressure on them and kill them or watch them run GG
That's a bad example. One of the issues is getting incap from stealth and then light attacks. If you are at low health you have no time to wait on healing ward. Putting pressure on your attacker is fine and all, but not effective if he has any idea what he's doing. Decent players are using this set and it's effectiveness against an already hurting class is over the top. You have to have either rapid Regen slotted or a resto ult up, or LOS.
What's wrong with this? So there is a counter to a set that sucks donkey balls against all other builds? I always thought that was a big enough counter for shield breaker in it's self. Hell, I have to slot deadly cloak to help survive all the leaps from DK's, I guess leaps should be removed because I have to counter for it.
No, SB is fine, most of the arguments in here are just, sorcs are underpowerd so remove shield breaker. I don't agree with this at all.
Cheers.
If you want a set that is a counter to shields then it should be a set that deals more dmg to shields. Not one that completely ignores them by just spamming light attack because you are too bad to actually use ur skills and you want crutches to carry you.
The issue of me being too bad is not a valid argument. It has no bearing on Anything.
But you want to change it to an increase total damage done too shields.? Like major or miner berserk but only to shields? So what you thinking, a 25% increase? 30%. It's a decent idea but idk if sorcs would like that either. Also it's against your argument of taking skill to use. You say shield breaker takes no skill cause you spam like attacks, well your idea even takes less skill. But, besides the bad reasons for your idea, I don't necessarily hate it. It will still be a counter to shields and suck otherwise.
rimmidimdim wrote: »Just the idea that's it impossible for a shield user to play for the potential shieldbreaker encounter is a little silly. But if they won't put on a skill that will heal through it, rapid Regen for instance, maybe rest ult, maybe combat prayer, ect. Healing poisons healing glyphs whatever. Holy Hannah, a heal pot will out heal the dam thing. Whatever. I think it's a good set has lots of easily playable counters. And in it's self it's it's own counter.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »i led you guys to the truth and showed video proof including advice on how to handle the situation.
that shield breaker set is no threat to you.
all it does is balance the fight when you guys shield stack.
rimmidimdim wrote: »rimmidimdim wrote: »Malamar1229 wrote: »Unfadingsilence wrote: »100% L2P post here people just move on...
BTW I love when a sorc is getting hit with SB and what do they do?? Stack more shields.... smh like come on STOP STACKING SHIELDS!! put pressure on the kid using SB if that's his only way of killing you then just put pressure on them and kill them or watch them run GG
That's a bad example. One of the issues is getting incap from stealth and then light attacks. If you are at low health you have no time to wait on healing ward. Putting pressure on your attacker is fine and all, but not effective if he has any idea what he's doing. Decent players are using this set and it's effectiveness against an already hurting class is over the top. You have to have either rapid Regen slotted or a resto ult up, or LOS.
What's wrong with this? So there is a counter to a set that sucks donkey balls against all other builds? I always thought that was a big enough counter for shield breaker in it's self. Hell, I have to slot deadly cloak to help survive all the leaps from DK's, I guess leaps should be removed because I have to counter for it.
No, SB is fine, most of the arguments in here are just, sorcs are underpowerd so remove shield breaker. I don't agree with this at all.
Cheers.
If you want a set that is a counter to shields then it should be a set that deals more dmg to shields. Not one that completely ignores them by just spamming light attack because you are too bad to actually use ur skills and you want crutches to carry you.
The issue of me being too bad is not a valid argument. It has no bearing on Anything.
But you want to change it to an increase total damage done too shields.? Like major or miner berserk but only to shields? So what you thinking, a 25% increase? 30%. It's a decent idea but idk if sorcs would like that either. Also it's against your argument of taking skill to use. You say shield breaker takes no skill cause you spam like attacks, well your idea even takes less skill. But, besides the bad reasons for your idea, I don't necessarily hate it. It will still be a counter to shields and suck otherwise.
Its not about sorcs liking the set. I wont like it either when i play a sorc. Its a counter for shields, it should be hard for a sorc to fight against it.
You are talking about detect pots against cloak. Thats precisely the issue. Shieldbreaker in its current form is nowhere near close to that. Detect pots have a limited duration and then a long cd, u can get out of range, enemy player still has to use skills to actually do dmg and the NB can survive without cloak. Sure that limits their capabilities but its possible to play without cloak. If you want an equivalent of shieldbreaker for NBs then the set would be something like. "Deals 2.1k oblivion dmg against NBs every time u light attack. If NB enters cloak they receive 2.1k oblivion dmg every second". That is obviously completely and utterly moronic. Thats not a counter. Thats stupidity.
And how the hell does a set that gives % amps to ur dmg, less skill than something that does a flat value of dmg which cant be mitigated by anything and is applied by just light attacking without a cooldown. % amps mean that you still have to do dmg. Having a good build, using ur skills efficiently etc cause the lower dmg you do, the less extra dmg u will get from a set that gives % amps and the more dmg u do the more u get out it. Thats the definition of a set requiring skill to get its effectiveness. Thats how it should be. Still not sure how you even thought that shieldbreaker in its current form is more skill than that.
rimmidimdim wrote: »rimmidimdim wrote: »Malamar1229 wrote: »Unfadingsilence wrote: »100% L2P post here people just move on...
BTW I love when a sorc is getting hit with SB and what do they do?? Stack more shields.... smh like come on STOP STACKING SHIELDS!! put pressure on the kid using SB if that's his only way of killing you then just put pressure on them and kill them or watch them run GG
That's a bad example. One of the issues is getting incap from stealth and then light attacks. If you are at low health you have no time to wait on healing ward. Putting pressure on your attacker is fine and all, but not effective if he has any idea what he's doing. Decent players are using this set and it's effectiveness against an already hurting class is over the top. You have to have either rapid Regen slotted or a resto ult up, or LOS.
What's wrong with this? So there is a counter to a set that sucks donkey balls against all other builds? I always thought that was a big enough counter for shield breaker in it's self. Hell, I have to slot deadly cloak to help survive all the leaps from DK's, I guess leaps should be removed because I have to counter for it.
No, SB is fine, most of the arguments in here are just, sorcs are underpowerd so remove shield breaker. I don't agree with this at all.
Cheers.
If you want a set that is a counter to shields then it should be a set that deals more dmg to shields. Not one that completely ignores them by just spamming light attack because you are too bad to actually use ur skills and you want crutches to carry you.
The issue of me being too bad is not a valid argument. It has no bearing on Anything.
But you want to change it to an increase total damage done too shields.? Like major or miner berserk but only to shields? So what you thinking, a 25% increase? 30%. It's a decent idea but idk if sorcs would like that either. Also it's against your argument of taking skill to use. You say shield breaker takes no skill cause you spam like attacks, well your idea even takes less skill. But, besides the bad reasons for your idea, I don't necessarily hate it. It will still be a counter to shields and suck otherwise.
Its not about sorcs liking the set. I wont like it either when i play a sorc. Its a counter for shields, it should be hard for a sorc to fight against it.
You are talking about detect pots against cloak. Thats precisely the issue. Shieldbreaker in its current form is nowhere near close to that. Detect pots have a limited duration and then a long cd, u can get out of range, enemy player still has to use skills to actually do dmg and the NB can survive without cloak. Sure that limits their capabilities but its possible to play without cloak. If you want an equivalent of shieldbreaker for NBs then the set would be something like. "Deals 2.1k oblivion dmg against NBs every time u light attack. If NB enters cloak they receive 2.1k oblivion dmg every second". That is obviously completely and utterly moronic. Thats not a counter. Thats stupidity.
And how the hell does a set that gives % amps to ur dmg, less skill than something that does a flat value of dmg which cant be mitigated by anything and is applied by just light attacking without a cooldown. % amps mean that you still have to do dmg. Having a good build, using ur skills efficiently etc cause the lower dmg you do, the less extra dmg u will get from a set that gives % amps and the more dmg u do the more u get out it. Thats the definition of a set requiring skill to get its effectiveness. Thats how it should be. Still not sure how you even thought that shieldbreaker in its current form is more skill than that.
There once was a SB-like counter to Cloak:
45 seconds d-pots.
NBs cried, it got nerfed by 66% percent, NBs have never been bottom tier again and everyone just praises how "well-designed" NBs are.
But asking for the same treatment for SB gets us insulted, lectured and lied to the face.
Sure is a double standard right there.
thankyourat wrote: »rimmidimdim wrote: »rimmidimdim wrote: »Malamar1229 wrote: »Unfadingsilence wrote: »100% L2P post here people just move on...
BTW I love when a sorc is getting hit with SB and what do they do?? Stack more shields.... smh like come on STOP STACKING SHIELDS!! put pressure on the kid using SB if that's his only way of killing you then just put pressure on them and kill them or watch them run GG
That's a bad example. One of the issues is getting incap from stealth and then light attacks. If you are at low health you have no time to wait on healing ward. Putting pressure on your attacker is fine and all, but not effective if he has any idea what he's doing. Decent players are using this set and it's effectiveness against an already hurting class is over the top. You have to have either rapid Regen slotted or a resto ult up, or LOS.
What's wrong with this? So there is a counter to a set that sucks donkey balls against all other builds? I always thought that was a big enough counter for shield breaker in it's self. Hell, I have to slot deadly cloak to help survive all the leaps from DK's, I guess leaps should be removed because I have to counter for it.
No, SB is fine, most of the arguments in here are just, sorcs are underpowerd so remove shield breaker. I don't agree with this at all.
Cheers.
If you want a set that is a counter to shields then it should be a set that deals more dmg to shields. Not one that completely ignores them by just spamming light attack because you are too bad to actually use ur skills and you want crutches to carry you.
The issue of me being too bad is not a valid argument. It has no bearing on Anything.
But you want to change it to an increase total damage done too shields.? Like major or miner berserk but only to shields? So what you thinking, a 25% increase? 30%. It's a decent idea but idk if sorcs would like that either. Also it's against your argument of taking skill to use. You say shield breaker takes no skill cause you spam like attacks, well your idea even takes less skill. But, besides the bad reasons for your idea, I don't necessarily hate it. It will still be a counter to shields and suck otherwise.
Its not about sorcs liking the set. I wont like it either when i play a sorc. Its a counter for shields, it should be hard for a sorc to fight against it.
You are talking about detect pots against cloak. Thats precisely the issue. Shieldbreaker in its current form is nowhere near close to that. Detect pots have a limited duration and then a long cd, u can get out of range, enemy player still has to use skills to actually do dmg and the NB can survive without cloak. Sure that limits their capabilities but its possible to play without cloak. If you want an equivalent of shieldbreaker for NBs then the set would be something like. "Deals 2.1k oblivion dmg against NBs every time u light attack. If NB enters cloak they receive 2.1k oblivion dmg every second". That is obviously completely and utterly moronic. Thats not a counter. Thats stupidity.
And how the hell does a set that gives % amps to ur dmg, less skill than something that does a flat value of dmg which cant be mitigated by anything and is applied by just light attacking without a cooldown. % amps mean that you still have to do dmg. Having a good build, using ur skills efficiently etc cause the lower dmg you do, the less extra dmg u will get from a set that gives % amps and the more dmg u do the more u get out it. Thats the definition of a set requiring skill to get its effectiveness. Thats how it should be. Still not sure how you even thought that shieldbreaker in its current form is more skill than that.
There once was a SB-like counter to Cloak:
45 seconds d-pots.
NBs cried, it got nerfed by 66% percent, NBs have never been bottom tier again and everyone just praises how "well-designed" NBs are.
But asking for the same treatment for SB gets us insulted, lectured and lied to the face.
Sure is a double standard right there.
Shield breaker and detect pots are about the same honestly. Playing melee magblade with no hots I have to deal with both and they are both equally annoying. More so when I'm getting zerged down. Overall I find my damage shield to be a stronger defensive tool than my Cloak so the sound of shield breaker does make me sort of tilted because I have to change my whole playstyle. Also most shieldbreaker users run mark Target as well to deal with magblades. The current length of detect pot is just right it means as of now you should only use it when you are ready to execute the nightblade. Same with shieldbreaker, on average I can out heal a shieldbreaker user with just healing ward and me pressuring them. 1v1 neither is really a problem.
Shield-breaker is only a problem if you see it on your death recap.
The solution to shield-breaker is to not wear damage shields ... wear heavy armor. Aaaahhh, but you don't want to do that. You'd have to give up too much if you went with heavy armor. Bottom line is that you prefer to spec for low health, wear light armor and use damage shields despite the risk that you might get hit with shield breaker. There are no free passes in this game and everything comes with a risk.
Do you really think that a Magicka Sorcerer could wear heavy armor, stop using damage shields, and remain viable?Shield-breaker is only a problem if you see it on your death recap.
The solution to shield-breaker is to not wear damage shields ... wear heavy armor. Aaaahhh, but you don't want to do that. You'd have to give up too much if you went with heavy armor. Bottom line is that you prefer to spec for low health, wear light armor and use damage shields despite the risk that you might get hit with shield breaker. There are no free passes in this game and everything comes with a risk.
Shield-breaker is only a problem if you see it on your death recap.
The solution to shield-breaker is to not wear damage shields ... wear heavy armor. Aaaahhh, but you don't want to do that. You'd have to give up too much if you went with heavy armor. Bottom line is that you prefer to spec for low health, wear light armor and use damage shields despite the risk that you might get hit with shield breaker. There are no free passes in this game and everything comes with a risk.
TankHealz2015 wrote: »
Returning to Cyridil after a break and WOW! what a difference the last patch has made...
As a result, I'm thinking to swap into Shieldbreaker armor.
Is there another armor set that will bump up the damage from Shieldbreaker?
For example the sets that boost light/heavy attack damages?
If not, what would be some great sets to combine with Shieldbreaker?
Argonian - DK - Stam
Note: I've been seeing lots of (mostly Sorcs?) players that:
1) seem to not take damage (probably big damage shields?)
2) seem to run almost 100% up time "immune to CC" (i.e. Vamp mist form + never ending supply of immove pots?)
Taking suggestions.
rimmidimdim wrote: »Just the idea that's it impossible for a shield user to play for the potential shieldbreaker encounter is a little silly. But if they won't put on a skill that will heal through it, rapid Regen for instance, maybe rest ult, maybe combat prayer, ect. Healing poisons healing glyphs whatever. Holy Hannah, a heal pot will out heal the dam thing. Whatever. I think it's a good set has lots of easily playable counters. And in it's self it's it's own counter.
And this shows that you have never played a sorc and you dont know what ur talking about. To have a competitive build as a sorc you need to rely on shields. The entire class revolves around shields. Even the heal of the class needs shields to stay alive. You are literally saying that shieldbreaker is balanced because a sorc can make a useless build against anything but shieldbreaker users. Let that sink in.
TankHealz2015 wrote: »What happens with:
Shieldbreaker + Sergeant's Mail + DK Molten Armaments = ?
Shieldbreaker + Queen's Elegance + DK Molten Armaments = ?
TankHealz2015 wrote: »What happens with:
Shieldbreaker + Sergeant's Mail + DK Molten Armaments = ?
Shieldbreaker + Queen's Elegance + DK Molten Armaments = ?
No, you use it with Knight’s Slayer or Torug’s Pact with an Oblivion enchant.
The set is still complete BS, it either needs to work only with Tel Var, or on heavy attacks only.
TankHealz2015 wrote: »TankHealz2015 wrote: »What happens with:
Shieldbreaker + Sergeant's Mail + DK Molten Armaments = ?
Shieldbreaker + Queen's Elegance + DK Molten Armaments = ?
No, you use it with Knight’s Slayer or Torug’s Pact with an Oblivion enchant.
The set is still complete BS, it either needs to work only with Tel Var, or on heavy attacks only.
OK,
Torug's Pact (crafted/heavy/impen/body) + Shieldbreaker (weapons/jewelry) + Oblivion enchants
I'm Argonian - DK - WereWolf
Advice on CP allocation?
To befoul or not to befoul... that is the question...
Points into light/heavy attack star?
rimmidimdim wrote: »A shieldbreak build makes his build useless against anything but shield users. Let that sink in.
Shieldbreak is fine as is.
rimmidimdim wrote: »Idk how thatrimmidimdim wrote: »Just the idea that's it impossible for a shield user to play for the potential shieldbreaker encounter is a little silly. But if they won't put on a skill that will heal through it, rapid Regen for instance, maybe rest ult, maybe combat prayer, ect. Healing poisons healing glyphs whatever. Holy Hannah, a heal pot will out heal the dam thing. Whatever. I think it's a good set has lots of easily playable counters. And in it's self it's it's own counter.
And this shows that you have never played a sorc and you dont know what ur talking about. To have a competitive build as a sorc you need to rely on shields. The entire class revolves around shields. Even the heal of the class needs shields to stay alive. You are literally saying that shieldbreaker is balanced because a sorc can make a useless build against anything but shieldbreaker users. Let that sink in.
A shieldbreak build makes his build useless against anything but shield users. Let that sink in.
Shieldbreak is fine as is.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »please stop asking for nerfs, people are having Loads of fun right now
Listen, if go to cryodiil right now you will see all classes fighting fairly, no class greater then another, they all dying and killing each other at same pace
if you don't believe me then go to cryodiil main campaign where i am at just watch the fights.
you will see that its just about perfect balance in classes.
come join the fun instead of asking for nerfs.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »please stop asking for nerfs, people are having Loads of fun right now
Listen, if go to cryodiil right now you will see all classes fighting fairly, no class greater then another, they all dying and killing each other at same pace
if you don't believe me then go to cryodiil main campaign where i am at just watch the fights.
you will see that its just about perfect balance in classes.
come join the fun instead of asking for nerfs.
You are literally asking for sorc nerfs for years. You are literally the driver of the "sorc OP, nerf sorc" train. I remember you once literally asking ZOS to nerf sorcs and cut their dmg in half. Lets just say that you are unfamiliar with the word balance. And the sad part is that even if ZOS nerfed sorcs and cut their dmg in half you would still somehow manage to get 1vXed by them.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »please stop asking for nerfs, people are having Loads of fun right now
Listen, if go to cryodiil right now you will see all classes fighting fairly, no class greater then another, they all dying and killing each other at same pace
if you don't believe me then go to cryodiil main campaign where i am at just watch the fights.
you will see that its just about perfect balance in classes.
come join the fun instead of asking for nerfs.
You are literally asking for sorc nerfs for years. You are literally the driver of the "sorc OP, nerf sorc" train. I remember you once literally asking ZOS to nerf sorcs and cut their dmg in half. Lets just say that you are unfamiliar with the word balance. And the sad part is that even if ZOS nerfed sorcs and cut their dmg in half you would still somehow manage to get 1vXed by them.
Waste of time, Pier. He's posted the EXACT SAME post like, five times since yesterday - that I know of.
He's either trolling, a bot, a TROLL BOT, or farming forum stars.
Point is, he's better left ignored. Useless and uneducated.