rimmidimdim wrote: »Malamar1229 wrote: »Unfadingsilence wrote: »100% L2P post here people just move on...
BTW I love when a sorc is getting hit with SB and what do they do?? Stack more shields.... smh like come on STOP STACKING SHIELDS!! put pressure on the kid using SB if that's his only way of killing you then just put pressure on them and kill them or watch them run GG
That's a bad example. One of the issues is getting incap from stealth and then light attacks. If you are at low health you have no time to wait on healing ward. Putting pressure on your attacker is fine and all, but not effective if he has any idea what he's doing. Decent players are using this set and it's effectiveness against an already hurting class is over the top. You have to have either rapid Regen slotted or a resto ult up, or LOS.
What's wrong with this? So there is a counter to a set that sucks donkey balls against all other builds? I always thought that was a big enough counter for shield breaker in it's self. Hell, I have to slot deadly cloak to help survive all the leaps from DK's, I guess leaps should be removed because I have to counter for it.
No, SB is fine, most of the arguments in here are just, sorcs are underpowerd so remove shield breaker. I don't agree with this at all.
Cheers.
How is Leap an exclusive threat to your class? It is dangerous for everyone, and everyone can block it.
Shieldbreaker is only a hard counter against sorcs, as they have no good HoTs to counter it. THIS are most arguments here.
Sorc being sucky in the current meta is just the nail in the coffin.
rimmidimdim wrote: »How is Leap an exclusive threat to your class? It is dangerous for everyone, and everyone can block it.
Shieldbreaker is only a hard counter against sorcs, as they have no good HoTs to counter it. THIS are most arguments here.
Sorc being sucky in the current meta is just the nail in the coffin.
My argument still stands. I like to counter leaps, I like too counter lots of things. Some people counter cloak with detect pots, that's a counter to a specific class, guess detect pots and mage light ect should be removed? Shield breaker is a counter to shields. And as a counter too shields, it sucks against all else. It's as it should be and I don't think sorcs are underpowerd.
rimmidimdim wrote: »Malamar1229 wrote: »Unfadingsilence wrote: »100% L2P post here people just move on...
BTW I love when a sorc is getting hit with SB and what do they do?? Stack more shields.... smh like come on STOP STACKING SHIELDS!! put pressure on the kid using SB if that's his only way of killing you then just put pressure on them and kill them or watch them run GG
That's a bad example. One of the issues is getting incap from stealth and then light attacks. If you are at low health you have no time to wait on healing ward. Putting pressure on your attacker is fine and all, but not effective if he has any idea what he's doing. Decent players are using this set and it's effectiveness against an already hurting class is over the top. You have to have either rapid Regen slotted or a resto ult up, or LOS.
What's wrong with this? So there is a counter to a set that sucks donkey balls against all other builds? I always thought that was a big enough counter for shield breaker in it's self. Hell, I have to slot deadly cloak to help survive all the leaps from DK's, I guess leaps should be removed because I have to counter for it.
No, SB is fine, most of the arguments in here are just, sorcs are underpowerd so remove shield breaker. I don't agree with this at all.
Cheers.
If you want a set that is a counter to shields then it should be a set that deals more dmg to shields. Not one that completely ignores them by just spamming light attack because you are too bad to actually use ur skills and you want crutches to carry you.
rimmidimdim wrote: »How is Leap an exclusive threat to your class? It is dangerous for everyone, and everyone can block it.
Shieldbreaker is only a hard counter against sorcs, as they have no good HoTs to counter it. THIS are most arguments here.
Sorc being sucky in the current meta is just the nail in the coffin.
My argument still stands. I like to counter leaps, I like too counter lots of things. Some people counter cloak with detect pots, that's a counter to a specific class, guess detect pots and mage light ect should be removed? Shield breaker is a counter to shields. And as a counter too shields, it sucks against all else. It's as it should be and I don't think sorcs are underpowerd.
rimmidimdim wrote: »How is Leap an exclusive threat to your class? It is dangerous for everyone, and everyone can block it.
Shieldbreaker is only a hard counter against sorcs, as they have no good HoTs to counter it. THIS are most arguments here.
Sorc being sucky in the current meta is just the nail in the coffin.
My argument still stands. I like to counter leaps, I like too counter lots of things. Some people counter cloak with detect pots, that's a counter to a specific class, guess detect pots and mage light ect should be removed? Shield breaker is a counter to shields. And as a counter too shields, it sucks against all else. It's as it should be and I don't think sorcs are underpowerd.
Your argument entirely ignores the fact that in bypassing shields, Shieldbreaker not only counters the primary defensive mechanic of a magicka Sorc but also their primary heal.
The Leap argument also ignores that Leap offers mitigating counterplay in the same way as any other direct damage AoE (blocking, resistances, shields) beyond ignoring dodge roll (provided it hits in the first place). Whereas Shieldbreaker ignores any mitigation.
As for detect pots vs Cloak, that at least can be considered a hard counter (unlike Leap vs whatever you're playing). It nullifies the invisibility for an extended duration. But unlike Shieldbreaker, it doesn't do anything against the NB's healing, mitigation still counts, the uptime is limited and it still requires actual skill useage to pressure opponent's.
rimmidimdim wrote: »Is shieldbreaker in game to counter shields? Yes. Only sorc shields? No.
Does using shieldbreaker gimp you against other builds that don't use shields? Yes.
Are there counters to being attack by a shieldbreaker wearer? Yes.
Is shieldbreaker OP in duels against shield users? Idk, maybe, but game should not be balanced on duels.
My comparing other counters in game too shieldbreaker is still good points, why? Cause there are counters to everything. Just wearing shieldbreaker is counter enough cause you don't know when a non shield user is around the corner.
But change shieldbreaker to do just more damage to shields as another sorc said. As long it retains the useless side against non shield users. Might be a good idea.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »the problem is that underneath your mass shields is that you have ZERO impen traits and your weaing ALL divines traits to MASS damage everyone else in PvP.
shield breaker set removed the shields and all u have left is a garbage build that needs to be set properly like all the other classes have 7 / 7 impen is a Great start.
just like we nightblades are forced to not use stealth and not use invisibility, just in your case, it's shields instead of stealth tools.
also: maybe start putting some points into Health and stamina instead of 100% into magicka maybe use a mundus thats not 100% magicka
there are hundreds of videos on how to make a great builds.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »the problem is that underneath your mass shields is that you have ZERO impen traits and your weaing ALL divines traits to MASS damage everyone else in PvP.
shield breaker set removed the shields and all u have left is a garbage build that needs to be set properly like all the other classes have 7 / 7 impen is a Great start.
just like we nightblades are forced to not use stealth and not use invisibility, just in your case, it's shields instead of stealth tools.
also: maybe start putting some points into Health and stamina instead of 100% into magicka maybe use a mundus thats not 100% magicka
there are hundreds of videos on how to make a great builds.
rimmidimdim wrote: »Just the idea that's it impossible for a shield user to play for the potential shieldbreaker encounter is a little silly. But if they won't put on a skill that will heal through it, rapid Regen for instance, maybe rest ult, maybe combat prayer, ect. Healing poisons healing glyphs whatever. Holy Hannah, a heal pot will out heal the dam thing. Whatever. I think it's a good set has lots of easily playable counters. And in it's self it's it's own counter.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWM5YmeSq_c dwemer_paleologist wrote: »just incase dont see it, it started at @2:37 of the video presentation.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »i led you guys to the truth and showed video proof including advice on how to handle the situation.
that shield breaker set is no threat to you.
all it does is balance the fight when you guys shield stack.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »i led you guys to the truth and showed video proof including advice on how to handle the situation.
that shield breaker set is no threat to you.
all it does is balance the fight when you guys shield stack.
I think that even though shieldbreaker is extremely hard on magsorcs, especially the ones without twilight or heal over times, it is still balanced overall since magsorcs are really the only class that suffers from it. 90% of shieldbreaker users are NBs who just spam light attack on you. if you ever run into them one on one you will be able to take them out no problem. just dont ward, most of them will not realise you stopped warding. i also highly suggest any magsorc to run a heal over time (power surge, rapid regen, even dark deal). It will make fighting shieldbreaker a lot easier but more importantly you dont need to cast healing ward often. At 60% hp for example you dont need healing ward with heal over times.
Shieldbreaker users are really only a problem if they Xv1 you, but id rather a shieldbreaker spammer than a snipe spammer who takes down 3/4 of my ward every second to be honest. With heal over times, fighting shieldbreaker will basically be like an ordinary fight without heal over times, their effects cancel out.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »i led you guys to the truth and showed video proof including advice on how to handle the situation.
that shield breaker set is no threat to you.
all it does is balance the fight when you guys shield stack.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »get a proper defence build like the rest of us instead of shield stacking and youll be fine.
you have WAY too much damage output and zero defence because you shield stack so hard that no one can break through.
so to allow the rest of the other classes the chance to pvp with you shield breaker was made.
it balanced it out and made it possible for us to be able to get a fair fight with you guys.
all you have to do now is make a proper defense and damage build Just Like the Rest of us have to and youll be fine.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »get a proper defence build like the rest of us instead of shield stacking and youll be fine.
you have WAY too much damage output and zero defence because you shield stack so hard that no one can break through.
so to allow the rest of the other classes the chance to pvp with you shield breaker was made.
it balanced it out and made it possible for us to be able to get a fair fight with you guys.
all you have to do now is make a proper defense and damage build Just Like the Rest of us have to and youll be fine.
dwemer_paleologist wrote: »get a proper defence build like the rest of us instead of shield stacking and youll be fine.
you have WAY too much damage output and zero defence because you shield stack so hard that no one can break through.
so to allow the rest of the other classes the chance to pvp with you shield breaker was made.
it balanced it out and made it possible for us to be able to get a fair fight with you guys.
all you have to do now is make a proper defense and damage build Just Like the Rest of us have to and youll be fine.
"You should build for a proper defense."
Plays NB, the class that has to build least for their defense. Yes, even shields, though they may scale if main stat require some building into.