nathan_bri wrote: »Perma-bans for exploiters I say. I have zero tolerance for cheaters.
DanielWinterborn wrote: »nathan_bri wrote: »Perma-bans for exploiters I say. I have zero tolerance for cheaters.
I have 0 tolerance for people talking out of their ass but you don't see me bashing you do you?
Think issue is that you don't get shared xp if multiple hit target or grouped.SheepdogPaladin wrote: »At dark anchors (dolmens), I am not getting any experience for tagging/killing individual mobs, including the dolmen boss. I only get experience at the very end of completing the dolmen event.
I am getting experience for killing random mobs around the game world.
nathan_bri wrote: »Perma-bans for exploiters I say. I have zero tolerance for cheaters.
nathan_bri wrote: »Perma-bans for exploiters I say. I have zero tolerance for cheaters.
The problem with this statement, much as I agree in sentiment, is the practicality of enforcing bans for 'exploiting' when players can literally and truthfully say all they were doing is what ZOS just told them to go do.
1. ZOS introduces as major new feature --> Housing storage
2. ^^ One of the only three ways to acquire storage is via telvar - if players can't or won't buy real life money crowns, or dislike/never did crafting, then telvar farming is the option ZOS gave
3. Day 1 of launch, how reasonable is it that players who want storage would make a beeline for IC and start farming telvar? Seems pretty logical to me.
So the bottom line question is - how reasonable is it to insist players stop farming telvar because they saw they were getting lots of XP, and even more important - when you're already past CP cap, how many players even bother to pay attention to the +XP messages?
**Edit - and no, I hadn't stepped foot in IC today. I bought all 7 storage chests/coffers with vouchers as I have 14 crafters - but the point is imo you can't enforce a ban for 'exploiting' when the net would catch players who simply went and farmed the resource ZOS just said they needed for the new storage feature.
DanielWinterborn wrote: »No rollback = my money back f.u.
NA was not bugged for XP gain in IC.
nathan_bri wrote: »nathan_bri wrote: »Perma-bans for exploiters I say. I have zero tolerance for cheaters.
The problem with this statement, much as I agree in sentiment, is the practicality of enforcing bans for 'exploiting' when players can literally and truthfully say all they were doing is what ZOS just told them to go do.
1. ZOS introduces as major new feature --> Housing storage
2. ^^ One of the only three ways to acquire storage is via telvar - if players can't or won't buy real life money crowns, or dislike/never did crafting, then telvar farming is the option ZOS gave
3. Day 1 of launch, how reasonable is it that players who want storage would make a beeline for IC and start farming telvar? Seems pretty logical to me.
So the bottom line question is - how reasonable is it to insist players stop farming telvar because they saw they were getting lots of XP, and even more important - when you're already past CP cap, how many players even bother to pay attention to the +XP messages?
**Edit - and no, I hadn't stepped foot in IC today. I bought all 7 storage chests/coffers with vouchers as I have 14 crafters - but the point is imo you can't enforce a ban for 'exploiting' when the net would catch players who simply went and farmed the resource ZOS just said they needed for the new storage feature.
I stand by my statement. If someone is caught obviously cheating, then perma-ban them. If someone is just doing their thing and passively gaining a benefit of which they may not be aware, then no ban. Cheaters typically communicate with other cheaters: “Hey! Come do this thing that is exploiting the XP!” “Cool! On my way!” ZoS is handling these on a case-by-case basis, which will probably entail a review of communications by the people making use of the exploit.
nathan_bri wrote: »nathan_bri wrote: »Perma-bans for exploiters I say. I have zero tolerance for cheaters.
The problem with this statement, much as I agree in sentiment, is the practicality of enforcing bans for 'exploiting' when players can literally and truthfully say all they were doing is what ZOS just told them to go do.
1. ZOS introduces as major new feature --> Housing storage
2. ^^ One of the only three ways to acquire storage is via telvar - if players can't or won't buy real life money crowns, or dislike/never did crafting, then telvar farming is the option ZOS gave
3. Day 1 of launch, how reasonable is it that players who want storage would make a beeline for IC and start farming telvar? Seems pretty logical to me.
So the bottom line question is - how reasonable is it to insist players stop farming telvar because they saw they were getting lots of XP, and even more important - when you're already past CP cap, how many players even bother to pay attention to the +XP messages?
**Edit - and no, I hadn't stepped foot in IC today. I bought all 7 storage chests/coffers with vouchers as I have 14 crafters - but the point is imo you can't enforce a ban for 'exploiting' when the net would catch players who simply went and farmed the resource ZOS just said they needed for the new storage feature.
I stand by my statement. If someone is caught obviously cheating, then perma-ban them. If someone is just doing their thing and passively gaining a benefit of which they may not be aware, then no ban. Cheaters typically communicate with other cheaters: “Hey! Come do this thing that is exploiting the XP!” “Cool! On my way!” ZoS is handling these on a case-by-case basis, which will probably entail a review of communications by the people making use of the exploit.
Grinding mobs in an mmo is cheating? Is it cheating to watch ur tv on ur 2nd screen while mind numbingly farming pve mobs?
How many players at max lvl are paying attention to their xp gains?
I remember when the skillpoint boss in the bangkorai group dungeon was bugged and ppl got dinged bc they were doing the normal gear farm rotation there that includes 3 of the delve bosses and the group event which are all within 50ft of each other.
This onus falls on zos, their lack of proper q&a, and using live as a beta test
It require skill.LadyAstrum wrote: »How does a bug like that even happen?
This. I haven't been in IC today, but I'm CP 690 and don't pay attention to XP any more. If I'd been there on my usual (not new) characters, it would have been a good long while before I'd noticed I was getting huge amounts of XP. It would make me sick to my stomach to be banned for something I didn't even notice was happening..... and even more important - when you're already past CP cap, how many players even bother to pay attention to the +XP messages?
Um, you realize not all of us have been playing all day, right?So this issue was known for the past 6 hours on NA and you only realised it now that the EU servers are up?
And all the NA players said nothing and abused the bug u left to go out live for tons and tons of xp? for the past 6 hours? ahahahhahhahahaha