Easy for a small team to look at something and not see the issues. A larger sampling can find things they miss or are no as close to it so they do see the flaws that a Dev may overlook.
lordrichter wrote: »Easy for a small team to look at something and not see the issues. A larger sampling can find things they miss or are no as close to it so they do see the flaws that a Dev may overlook.
The people who make these costumes, and who test them, are professionals, and experts. Part of that means not overlooking "issues". While it is true that this was not on PTS, there is no reason why that should matter. We are dealing with professionals.
This would be different if the work was being done by unpaid volunteers as part of a community project.
lordrichter wrote: »Easy for a small team to look at something and not see the issues. A larger sampling can find things they miss or are no as close to it so they do see the flaws that a Dev may overlook.
The people who make these costumes, and who test them, are professionals, and experts. Part of that means not overlooking "issues". While it is true that this was not on PTS, there is no reason why that should matter. We are dealing with professionals.
This would be different if the work was being done by unpaid volunteers as part of a community project.
lordrichter wrote: »Easy for a small team to look at something and not see the issues. A larger sampling can find things they miss or are no as close to it so they do see the flaws that a Dev may overlook.
The people who make these costumes, and who test them, are professionals, and experts. Part of that means not overlooking "issues". While it is true that this was not on PTS, there is no reason why that should matter. We are dealing with professionals.
This would be different if the work was being done by unpaid volunteers as part of a community project.