Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6

Should there be a daily/weekly/monthly cap on the amount of threads you can create?

Illurian
Illurian
✭✭✭✭✭
Title.

Just curious to see how people feel about others creating 10+ threads a day.
Edited by Illurian on January 25, 2018 11:55AM
Kiss the chaos.

Should there be a daily/weekly/monthly cap on the amount of threads you can create? 187 votes

Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
52%
theskymovesGilvothDeadlyRecluseNewBlacksmurfDarcyMardinwenchmore420b14_ESOPhilhypeSvenjaYulsMadyHrogunAlienSlofola.wilhelmssonb16_ESOSodanTokdennissomb16_ESOJasonSilverSpringMajeurevyndral13preub18_ESOSkoomahSpacemonkey 98 votes
No, there shouldn't be a cap
39%
SynfidieCavalryPKOsteosSkuaTurelusaubrey.baconb16_ESOScardyFoxdanno8bmannb16_ESOanitajoneb17_ESOFoxhuntKorah_EaglecryAlisyraerebozElsonsoKarminathevampnimbliNolaArchWldKardepaulsimonps 74 votes
Other
8%
sdtlcEdziuTequilaFireDieAlteHexeWrathmanevamp_emilyChunkyCatMic1007KrishakPanettierLiquidPonyklowdy1logarifmikbrimstone74JamuThatsWhoAnotherone773 15 votes
  • Niobium
    Niobium
    ✭✭✭✭
    I feel sorry for anyone who has to post multiple threads, with repeated topics that have been beaten to death, resurrected and beaten to death again, just to earn some fake internet points.

    I pity those individuals that are so starved for attention they need to come to the forums and do that.
    Edited by Niobium on January 25, 2018 12:00PM
  • swippy
    swippy
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
    pushing good threads off the front page to farm forum stars doesn't seem very sporting and isn't in the best interest of the community.
  • Sixty5
    Sixty5
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    I'm not sure what is worse, forced spam threads, or meta polls
    Lord and Savior of the Association of Serious S***posters.

    I play a character called "Gives Me Wood Elf" because I am a mature and sensible person.
    Stam Sorc main in Battlegrounds
  • DieAlteHexe
    DieAlteHexe
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    Other
    I think it's better to just report those who take advantage of their posting privileges. There are some folk who post rather often whose content is worthwhile.


    Dirty, filthy casual aka Nancy, the Wallet Warrior Carebear Potato Whale Snowflake
  • sdtlc
    sdtlc
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Other
    Maybe posting is cheaper than professional help?
    Die Qualität verhält sich nicht zwingend proportional zur Masse...

    Meisterangler vor dem perfekten Rogen...
    +Kaiserstadt, Wrothgar, Hew's Fluch, Goldküste, Vvardenfell, Stadt der Uhrwerke, Sommersend, Artaeum, Trübmoor, Elsweyr (nördliches & südliches), Graumoor, Reik, Dunkelforst

    [PC][DC]Zunft der Helden[PvX]
    Feierabendgilde mit Ambitionen
  • Carbonised
    Carbonised
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
    There hasn't been the need for that until now, since most people have a minimum of self restraint. But the forum farming for some people has become excessive. The same goes for commenting in every single thread in hopes of farming insightfuls and awesomes. It derails any discussion into a farming minigame of memes and edgy comments.
  • TequilaFire
    TequilaFire
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Other
    If you don't respond to those threads they will sink off the front page and author won't get points.
    I have often noticed that troll threads go on for way more pages than they should, guess we all can't resist taking the bait.
  • Leandor
    Leandor
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭
    How about self regulation? How about just not posting in the topics of that one single person this poll is aimed at?
    Edited by Leandor on January 25, 2018 1:02PM
  • RobbieRocket
    RobbieRocket
    ✭✭✭
    Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
    Suggested caps:
    5 Daily
    20 Weekly
    50 Monthly
    250 Yearly
  • idk
    idk
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Niobium wrote: »
    I feel sorry for anyone who has to post multiple threads, with repeated topics that have been beaten to death, resurrected and beaten to death again, just to earn some fake internet points.

    I pity those individuals that are so starved for attention they need to come to the forums and do that.

    This, but it certainly does not mean we need anything OP is suggesting.
  • logarifmik
    logarifmik
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Other
    Why? Moderation is quite efficient.
    EU PC: @logarifmik | Languages: Русский, English
    Dimitri Frernis | Breton Sorcerer | Damage Dealer | Daggerfall Covenant
    Scales-of-Ice | Argonian Warden | Tank / Healer | Daggerfall Covenant
  • SGT_Wolfe101st
    SGT_Wolfe101st
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    We, the consumer of the threads, can decide on what is relevant and what isn't. The posts that warrant or cultivate a discussion will rise and those that are just troll posts will fade. No need for limits, absolutes are the enemy of free and open dialog. There are many contributors on this forum that post, good, useful, informative posts several times a day, week, month, they, nor anyone else, should have their ability to post limited.
    Edited by SGT_Wolfe101st on January 25, 2018 1:30PM
    PS4 -NA AD

    Wood Elf - StamNB - DPS
    Nord - MagDK - Tank
    High Elf - MagSorc - DPS
    Dark Elf - Mag Warden- Healer
  • TequilaFire
    TequilaFire
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Other
    Now this thread has gone south by singling out one person.
    Just saying.
  • vyndral13preub18_ESO
    vyndral13preub18_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
    Niobium wrote: »
    I feel sorry for anyone who has to post multiple threads, with repeated topics that have been beaten to death, resurrected and beaten to death again, just to earn some fake internet points.

    I pity those individuals that are so starved for attention they need to come to the forums and do that.

    Agreed. We should all have to earn our fake internet awards the old fashioned way. Trolling. Come on 10 stars!
  • Elsonso
    Elsonso
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    No, but I do look at the name of the person who creates the thread, and will avoid some people that seem to be farming forum badges.
    XBox EU/NA:@ElsonsoJannus
    PC NA/EU: @Elsonso
    PSN NA/EU: @ElsonsoJannus
    Total in-game hours: 11321
    X/Twitter: ElsonsoJannus
  • Runschei
    Runschei
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    Let people spam polls. I like polls.
  • Beardimus
    Beardimus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
    Remove forum points for posting new threads. Done
    Xbox One | EU | EP
    Beardimus : VR16 Dunmer MagSorc [RIP MagDW 2015-2018]
    Emperor of Sotha Sil 02-2018 & Sheogorath 05-2019
    1st Emperor of Ravenwatch
    Alts - - for the Lolz
    Archimus : Bosmer Thief / Archer / Werewolf
    Orcimus : Fat drunk Orc battlefield 1st aider
    Scalimus - Argonian Sorc Healer / Pet master

    Fighting small scale with : The SAXON Guild
    Fighting with [PvP] : The Undaunted Wolves
    Trading Guilds : TradersOfNirn | FourSquareTraders

    Xbox One | NA | EP
    Bëardimus : L43 Dunmer Magsorc / BG
    Heals-With-Pets : VR16 Argonian Sorc PvP / BG Healer
    Nordimus : VR16 Stamsorc
    Beardimus le 13iem : L30 Dunmer Magsorc Icereach
  • SisterGoat
    SisterGoat
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
    If somebody is spamming by creating lots and lots of new threads to get forum points, then I think there does need to be a limit. But there's no need to do any name dropping.

    I only create threads when I feel like there needs to be something important addressed or to give out useful information.
    Jumps-In-Water - Magicka Templar
    Dar'akar - Stamina Nightblade
    Jumps-In-Lava - Magicka Dragon Knight
    PC/NA
  • Woeler
    Woeler
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
    My observations have also shown that the number of threads created per day directly relates to how dumb those threads are. The more threads created, the more purposeless and dumb the topics are.
  • Turelus
    Turelus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    No.

    We should be encouraging people to post discussions and getting more people in the community on the forums and posting, not discouraging it.

    I know I am guilty of ignoring the following advice as well but if you're not interested in the threads people are making you can always avoid those threads.
    @Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
    "Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."
  • Niobium
    Niobium
    ✭✭✭✭
    We, the consumer of the threads, can decide on what is relevant and what isn't. The posts that warrant or cultivate a discussion will rise and those that are just troll posts will fade. No need for limits, absolutes are the enemy of free and open dialog. There are many contributors on this forum that post, good, useful, informative posts several times a day, week, month, they, nor anyone else, should have their ability to post limited.

    The problem at the moment is that the loudest ones with the most stamina to keep posting inane topics will continue to push useful threads off the front (and subsequent) pages.

    What would be useful would be some way to (I hesitate to say downvote) but a way to hide topics from people who contribute virtually nothing.

    Whether that be on a personal (ie only affects my forum pages) or on a global (ie affects everyone's forum pages) level I'm not sure. But I absolutely would love to see more of the useful, informative posts than useless ones or re-hashes of "controversial" topics that have been beaten to death a thousand times over.

    That way the consumer is deciding what's relevant and what's not rather than individuals flooding the forums and, for lack of any kind of measure against it, always having their own posts at the top because of the sheer number of them.
  • Korah_Eaglecry
    Korah_Eaglecry
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    I dont think we need a cap on making threads. We arent at that point yet where that many people are spamming the forums. But we do have an issue with a handful of people here on the forums, that shall remain unnamed, that need to bring it down a few notches. I cant say if theyre are doing it because they are seeking attention or because theyre for some odd reason trying to farm likes, insightfuls and awesomes...

    Penniless Sellsword Company
    Captain Paramount - Jorrhaq Vhent
    Korith Eaglecry * Enrerion Aedihle * Laerinel Rhaev * Caius Berilius * Seylina Ithvala * H'Vak the Grimjawl
    Tenarei Rhaev * Dazsh Ro Khar * Yynril Rothvani * Bathes-In-Coin * Anaelle Faerniil * Azjani Ma'Les
    Aban Shahid Bakr * Kheshna gra-Gharbuk * Gallisten Bondurant * Etain Maquier * Atsu Kalame * Faulpia Severinus
    What is better, to be born good, or to overcome your evil nature through great effort? - Paarthurnax
  • Mic1007
    Mic1007
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    Other
    As long as it's relevant to ESO, I see no issue in making as many threads as you wish.

    There should be a limit on topics though, such as "Spellcrafting" and "PvP Justice System" and "Cyrodiil Lag" and "Global Auction House". Any new threads being opened on dead topics should just be closed immediately. Necro'd threads should be locked ASAP as well, regardless of how "relevant they still are".

    We need new conversations, not old ones.
    @Mic1007
    Champion Rank 900+
    DC/AD/EP
    PC NA

    PAWS (Positively Against Wrip-off Stuff) - Say No to Crown Crates!
  • Turelus
    Turelus
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    Niobium wrote: »
    We, the consumer of the threads, can decide on what is relevant and what isn't. The posts that warrant or cultivate a discussion will rise and those that are just troll posts will fade. No need for limits, absolutes are the enemy of free and open dialog. There are many contributors on this forum that post, good, useful, informative posts several times a day, week, month, they, nor anyone else, should have their ability to post limited.

    The problem at the moment is that the loudest ones with the most stamina to keep posting inane topics will continue to push useful threads off the front (and subsequent) pages.

    What would be useful would be some way to (I hesitate to say downvote) but a way to hide topics from people who contribute virtually nothing.

    Whether that be on a personal (ie only affects my forum pages) or on a global (ie affects everyone's forum pages) level I'm not sure. But I absolutely would love to see more of the useful, informative posts than useless ones or re-hashes of "controversial" topics that have been beaten to death a thousand times over.

    That way the consumer is deciding what's relevant and what's not rather than individuals flooding the forums and, for lack of any kind of measure against it, always having their own posts at the top because of the sheer number of them.
    The forums does have an ignore feature however I am not 100% sure how it works as I've never used it.
    There is a help article here: https://help.elderscrollsonline.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/23039/~/how-do-i-ignore-someone-on-the-forums

    Also I realise with that revelation hundreds of people have just stopped seeing my forums debating and trash posts. :cry:
    @Turelus - EU PC Megaserver
    "Don't count on others for help. In the end each of us is in this alone. The survivors are those who know how to look out for themselves."
  • ZOS_MattL
    ZOS_MattL
    ✭✭✭
    Hey there,
    We have had to remove several posts in this thread for calling out specific users. We do not allow naming and shaming for any reason and this behavior will result in an action on your account.
    Regards,
    Matt
    The Elder Scrolls Online: Tamriel Unlimited - ZeniMax Online Studios
    Forum Rules | Code of Conduct | Terms of Service | Home Page | Help Site
    Staff Post
  • Korah_Eaglecry
    Korah_Eaglecry
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    Mic1007 wrote: »
    As long as it's relevant to ESO, I see no issue in making as many threads as you wish.

    There should be a limit on topics though, such as "Spellcrafting" and "PvP Justice System" and "Cyrodiil Lag" and "Global Auction House". Any new threads being opened on dead topics should just be closed immediately. Necro'd threads should be locked ASAP as well, regardless of how "relevant they still are".

    We need new conversations, not old ones.

    Ive seen this done on other forums, where they create a CCT ban list. It often gets ignored and becomes frustrating for the forum-goers when an actual interesting topic comes up that falls within the ban list. Moderators have to take a hard stance on the list and absolutely shut it down even when things are being civil and productive.

    Not really sure we are at that point either. As most topics that fall within the realm of beating a dead horse usually gets self-moderated by the forumgoers (as in the majority agree that topic has been brought up enough times and doesnt need another round of discussion). If those topics were constantly heated-flamebait topics then we might actually need such a list since the community wouldnt be able to self-moderate. Ultimately that would be something the moderators and Community Managers need to hash-out because it brings a whole new host of issues to deal with when interacting with the community.
    Penniless Sellsword Company
    Captain Paramount - Jorrhaq Vhent
    Korith Eaglecry * Enrerion Aedihle * Laerinel Rhaev * Caius Berilius * Seylina Ithvala * H'Vak the Grimjawl
    Tenarei Rhaev * Dazsh Ro Khar * Yynril Rothvani * Bathes-In-Coin * Anaelle Faerniil * Azjani Ma'Les
    Aban Shahid Bakr * Kheshna gra-Gharbuk * Gallisten Bondurant * Etain Maquier * Atsu Kalame * Faulpia Severinus
    What is better, to be born good, or to overcome your evil nature through great effort? - Paarthurnax
  • duendology
    duendology
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    This is rich.
    I've been on online (various) forums since, I can't even remember, 97? I modded (and owned) quite a number of them. And there has NEVER been a suggestion to limit the daily/weekly thread cap because, apparently, some poster name appears often and apparently it annoys other people?
    If you don't like someone's posts, or rather the fact it's posted by a specific person, ignore both. This is THAT simple.
    Limiting daily/weekly cap should also come with the limit of daily/weekly replies perhaps too? So we'd have less sarcastic b******t and verbal diarrhea.

    Hmm, it is also the first EVER forum in my experience with online communication platforms... where people seem to care so much about something which is nothing else but an ESO version of the Facebook "likes". This is new to me.
    Edited by duendology on January 25, 2018 3:05PM
    PC/NA
    - Redguard StamBlade dps ["bowtard" crafty girl who likes spinning with daggers too.]
    - Breton SorcMag dps [She's got an identity crisis, but I believe in her.]
    - Dunmer Templar dps/healer [she's a healer, then again she likes inferno staff too...]
    And..
    - High Elf SorcMag dps [It's quite possible his daddy was a Nord.]

    I am an old-fashioned Goth
  • vyndral13preub18_ESO
    vyndral13preub18_ESO
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    Yes, there should be a daily/weekly/monthly cap
    duendology wrote: »
    This is rich.
    I've been on online (various) forums since, I can't even remember, 97? I modded (and owned) quite a number of them. And there has NEVER been a suggestion to limit the daily/weekly thread cap because, apparently, some poster name appears often and apparently it annoys other people?
    If you don't like someone's posts, or rather the fact it's posted by a specific person, ignore both. This is THAT simple.
    Limiting daily/weekly cap should also come with the limit of daily/weekly replies perhaps too? So we'd have less sarcastic b******t and verbal diarrhea.

    Hmm, it is also the first EVER forum in my experience with online communication platforms... where people seem to care so much about something which is nothing else but an ESO version of the Facebook "likes". This is new to me.

    We are a new an innovative MMO, with things like an AH feature with no useful search function!

    Why shouldn’t we be a new and Innovative forum, that cares about random crap!
  • Apache_Kid
    Apache_Kid
    ✭✭✭✭✭
    ✭✭✭✭
    No, there shouldn't be a cap
    Beardimus wrote: »
    Remove forum points for posting new threads. Done

    Wait, posting threads gives forum points?
  • Niobium
    Niobium
    ✭✭✭✭
    Turelus wrote: »
    Niobium wrote: »
    We, the consumer of the threads, can decide on what is relevant and what isn't. The posts that warrant or cultivate a discussion will rise and those that are just troll posts will fade. No need for limits, absolutes are the enemy of free and open dialog. There are many contributors on this forum that post, good, useful, informative posts several times a day, week, month, they, nor anyone else, should have their ability to post limited.

    The problem at the moment is that the loudest ones with the most stamina to keep posting inane topics will continue to push useful threads off the front (and subsequent) pages.

    What would be useful would be some way to (I hesitate to say downvote) but a way to hide topics from people who contribute virtually nothing.

    Whether that be on a personal (ie only affects my forum pages) or on a global (ie affects everyone's forum pages) level I'm not sure. But I absolutely would love to see more of the useful, informative posts than useless ones or re-hashes of "controversial" topics that have been beaten to death a thousand times over.

    That way the consumer is deciding what's relevant and what's not rather than individuals flooding the forums and, for lack of any kind of measure against it, always having their own posts at the top because of the sheer number of them.
    The forums does have an ignore feature however I am not 100% sure how it works as I've never used it.
    There is a help article here: https://help.elderscrollsonline.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/23039/~/how-do-i-ignore-someone-on-the-forums

    Also I realise with that revelation hundreds of people have just stopped seeing my forums debating and trash posts. :cry:

    That feature only blocks that person from messaging you - it doesn't help remove the clutter of useless posts by people doing nothing but farming points. The posts will still be there by the authors pushing more useful posts to second page and beyond.

    Already enough clutter on the forums - a way to clean up for the individuals to see what they want (or hide what they don't want) would be awesome.
    Edited by Niobium on January 25, 2018 3:36PM
This discussion has been closed.