I understand it is now the equivalent of putting your hand down the queen mum's knickers, but before I left it was de rigeuer or right on if you'll forgive my French why is now considered evil, and in what way does using that weapon of war that every nation on Earth uses bad. Now I am not debating if it is bad or good, it clearly was bad but no one has been able to tell me why, except to say it was ruining the game? In history spying won wars, you know cracking the engima code and so on, why is it bad in this game?
Spying what? childish zone chat? That is hilarious. Real strategies are in group and guild chats.
I understand it is now the equivalent of putting your hand down the queen mum's knickers, but before I left it was de rigeuer or right on if you'll forgive my French why is now considered evil, and in what way does using that weapon of war that every nation on Earth uses bad. Now I am not debating if it is bad or good, it clearly was bad but no one has been able to tell me why, except to say it was ruining the game? In history spying won wars, you know cracking the engima code and so on, why is it bad in this game?
sorry for the multi posts I'm multi tasking. I understand that it is considered wrong, but it's still a winning strategy, and when I was here a year ago, was informed that winning is rather important in pvp. Act like that in pve and you will get booted, the worst you can expect in PVP is booted and added to an ignore list, which with most people having multiple characters, in any one faction, is not really a problem.
Now I am not going to use it now because everyone is saying it is wrong, so I want to be in groups, eventually of course I will be ignored by every group in pvp, for doing the wrong thing. I'm just saying why is it bad apart from the fact it makes you a ***?
And yes I am comparing pvp to war, because that is what it is, it's not a funbag of love and friendly banter per se unless you are on the same team, if you think people are not competative because it's just a game, you have misunderstood my point, and history. I'm pretty sure Kasparov was not loving getting beaten by a computer either or the other guy.