Mojomonkeyman wrote: »Ranked & Unranked is all we need, pugs & premades will separate naturally through this. As much as I dislike CP BGs, its the lesser evil. We need to match teams better.
Mojomonkeyman wrote: »Ranked & Unranked is all we need, pugs & premades will separate naturally through this. As much as I dislike CP BGs, its the lesser evil. We need to match teams better.
NordSwordnBoard wrote: »Mojomonkeyman wrote: »Ranked & Unranked is all we need, pugs & premades will separate naturally through this. As much as I dislike CP BGs, its the lesser evil. We need to match teams better.
I agree with the concept, but disagree on implementation. Maybe they sort themselves by premades vs pug - If your pug is good enough to try the pre mades category, leaderboard discussion follows after this.
Are there leaderboard people who exclusively or predominantly pug?
I think ranked vs unranked, pug vs premade — both would be amazing. But I don’t think they’re realistic. Cp vs no cp is the only one I feel ZOS is capable of achieving.
As far as specific game types go, I think we would be less thirsty for a deathmatch only queue if we just got a higher frequency of deathmatches. One in ten doesn’t cut it. That said if I have time for a match or two I’d want to do deathmatches. If I’m playing for two hours straight, I don’t mind a few other types mixed in.
How would you guys feel about a “ranked / cp queue” and “unranked / no cp queue”
Because these are the official ZOS message boards and exist solely for us to whine and demand how ZOS should run their game. Duh.Taleof2Cities wrote: »If there’s no wrong answer then why isn’t “fine the way it is” not a poll option?
BG should become populated before any changes to queue.
And btw queue still not work as flawless as it should.
Oh snap. A new challenger approaches.Don't split the queue bit allow the queued players to vote on map and game type