DocFrost72 wrote: »How does being good in cyro help pve dps?
If that were actually true, Cyrodiil would be full of them.. because.. FOTM is what people play.
Not saying they're bad... but they're a weaker sorc basically.
Sorry just to correct you here it takes a lot of time to re roll a toon and a lot of people don't want to do that when they already have several at max level that they play. Contrast that to gear fotm which is much easier to obtain. So suffice to say I don't agree
DocFrost72 wrote: »How does being good in cyro help pve dps?
DocFrost72 wrote: »How does being good in cyro help pve dps?
How does the class lacking in one aspect of the game means that the class is dead ?
Mojomonkeyman wrote: »
Just because you and a handful other mediocre players keep spamming the same wrong message doesn't make it "fact". Your way of debating makes me not only doubt your skills as a player but your level of education as well.
All I see is wrong info & vague strawmwns. None of you complainers has been able to objectively point out magWardens actual status quo somewhat legitimately by:
a) montioring all PvP scenarios individually (Duels, BGs, Cyro, IC; Zerg, Smallscale, Solo Roaming) and providing feedback on those compared to other classes
b) mathematically evaluating skill performance to equivalents of other classes while keeping the big picture in mind (stronger skills are offset by weaker skills, manual targeting more difficult than smart targeting)
I haven't met a good magWarden on PC EU ("good" means better than me in that case) and in my books PvP magWarden has:
1) less heals than a mTemplar
2) less and more predictable burst than a mSorc or mNB
3) less mobility than mSorc or mNB
3) less tankyness than a DK
It's a middle of the road class, it can a bit of everything, but doesn't excel in anything (except spamming birds which is completely not viable for any solo pvp scenario or BGs). It is not mobile at all, means every fight that is not won is lost (unlike playing sorc or NB). No escape.
I consider 90% of people in this game completely terrible at PvP, so I understand that if you (the typical forum bob) meet a really good player who mastered mWarden, it can look really strong. But so would any other class.
From what I've seen, mWarden is strongest inmidst of an allied zerg or against terrible players. Are you a terrible player?
I agree in almost evrething but warden are really strong also for small scale pvp for their utility/aoe burst. Got major defile aoe, you can wipe a small Group if you time your deep fissure with dawnbreaker and maybe an ally ulti. Permafrost in combo with an ally eye of flame is op. Not talking because i've encountered some of them i talk because i play one of them and i see the difference when i use other classes. Still
hard to play for duels or solo play if u encounter people Who actually can play their class and has a lot of experience. Stronger in no cp pvp, i use to melt a lot of people in bg. Ah was forgetting about the bear, is super bad exept for duels! Damn if Zeni fix it it would be super op in duels.
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »DocFrost72 wrote: »How does being good in cyro help pve dps?
That is exactly the problem of eso. In PvE Warden is underperforming... but in PvP it is just ridiculously broken and OP...
The stuff that warden can pull off in PvP is just insane.... And the best part is that ZOS almost always balances the game for PvP and not for PvE (because of PvP-ers complains ? Is there a reason to complain that a class is OP in PvE ? )
Anyway - we have a good example - Nightblade class. It was ok in PvE - but due to PvP-ers complains it is now only the shadow of its used to be.
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »DocFrost72 wrote: »How does being good in cyro help pve dps?
That is exactly the problem of eso. In PvE Warden is underperforming... but in PvP it is just ridiculously broken and OP...
The stuff that warden can pull off in PvP is just insane.... And the best part is that ZOS almost always balances the game for PvP and not for PvE (because of PvP-ers complains ? Is there a reason to complain that a class is OP in PvE ? )
Anyway - we have a good example - Nightblade class. It was ok in PvE - but due to PvP-ers complains it is now only the shadow of its used to be.
If that were actually true, Cyrodiil would be full of them.. because.. FOTM is what people play.
Not saying they're bad... but they're a weaker sorc basically.
Sorry just to correct you here it takes a lot of time to re roll a toon and a lot of people don't want to do that when they already have several at max level that they play. Contrast that to gear fotm which is much easier to obtain. So suffice to say I don't agree
Anyone with a max CP toon can level a new toon very fast... only thing that takes a bit of time is grabbing skyshards... suffice to say, I don't agree with you
Anyway only 2 ppl on this forum that have a serious issue with wardens... so I'd say that makes them a non-issue :-)
If that were actually true, Cyrodiil would be full of them.. because.. FOTM is what people play.
Not saying they're bad... but they're a weaker sorc basically.
Sorry just to correct you here it takes a lot of time to re roll a toon and a lot of people don't want to do that when they already have several at max level that they play. Contrast that to gear fotm which is much easier to obtain. So suffice to say I don't agree
Anyone with a max CP toon can level a new toon very fast... only thing that takes a bit of time is grabbing skyshards... suffice to say, I don't agree with you
Anyway only 2 ppl on this forum that have a serious issue with wardens... so I'd say that makes them a non-issue :-)
Again you're wrong
You tell me how long it takes to lvl undaunted?
Levelling every weapon skill line to 50 and all the skills to lvl IV takes an incredibly long time.
Mages Guild takes a very long time (even with the addon)
If that were actually true, Cyrodiil would be full of them.. because.. FOTM is what people play.
Not saying they're bad... but they're a weaker sorc basically.
Sorry just to correct you here it takes a lot of time to re roll a toon and a lot of people don't want to do that when they already have several at max level that they play. Contrast that to gear fotm which is much easier to obtain. So suffice to say I don't agree
Anyone with a max CP toon can level a new toon very fast... only thing that takes a bit of time is grabbing skyshards... suffice to say, I don't agree with you
Anyway only 2 ppl on this forum that have a serious issue with wardens... so I'd say that makes them a non-issue :-)
Again you're wrong
You tell me how long it takes to lvl undaunted?
Levelling every weapon skill line to 50 and all the skills to lvl IV takes an incredibly long time.
Mages Guild takes a very long time (even with the addon)
Can all be done in a week, if your committed. And that Includes decent sleep. Undaunted not included
If that were actually true, Cyrodiil would be full of them.. because.. FOTM is what people play.
Not saying they're bad... but they're a weaker sorc basically.
Sorry just to correct you here it takes a lot of time to re roll a toon and a lot of people don't want to do that when they already have several at max level that they play. Contrast that to gear fotm which is much easier to obtain. So suffice to say I don't agree
Anyone with a max CP toon can level a new toon very fast... only thing that takes a bit of time is grabbing skyshards... suffice to say, I don't agree with you
Anyway only 2 ppl on this forum that have a serious issue with wardens... so I'd say that makes them a non-issue :-)
Again you're wrong
You tell me how long it takes to lvl undaunted?
Levelling every weapon skill line to 50 and all the skills to lvl IV takes an incredibly long time.
Mages Guild takes a very long time (even with the addon)
Can all be done in a week, if your committed. And that Includes decent sleep. Undaunted not included
Ok, well you have to include it.
It contains one of the most useful passives in the game.
Even a week is a long time. In what world is that a short amount of time? And that's only if you're incredibly committed and only focus on levelling, which is not particularly fun.
Why would anyone raise that levelling a toon to a reasonably acceptable level (throughout all categories, skills, etc) does not take a long time? I likely won't agree with that person on much.
cpuScientist wrote: »Mojomonkeyman wrote: »
Just because you and a handful other mediocre players keep spamming the same wrong message doesn't make it "fact". Your way of debating makes me not only doubt your skills as a player but your level of education as well.
All I see is wrong info & vague strawmwns. None of you complainers has been able to objectively point out magWardens actual status quo somewhat legitimately by:
a) montioring all PvP scenarios individually (Duels, BGs, Cyro, IC; Zerg, Smallscale, Solo Roaming) and providing feedback on those compared to other classes
b) mathematically evaluating skill performance to equivalents of other classes while keeping the big picture in mind (stronger skills are offset by weaker skills, manual targeting more difficult than smart targeting)
I haven't met a good magWarden on PC EU ("good" means better than me in that case) and in my books PvP magWarden has:
1) less heals than a mTemplar
2) less and more predictable burst than a mSorc or mNB
3) less mobility than mSorc or mNB
3) less tankyness than a DK
It's a middle of the road class, it can a bit of everything, but doesn't excel in anything (except spamming birds which is completely not viable for any solo pvp scenario or BGs). It is not mobile at all, means every fight that is not won is lost (unlike playing sorc or NB). No escape.
I consider 90% of people in this game completely terrible at PvP, so I understand that if you (the typical forum bob) meet a really good player who mastered mWarden, it can look really strong. But so would any other class.
From what I've seen, mWarden is strongest inmidst of an allied zerg or against terrible players. Are you a terrible player?
I agree in almost evrething but warden are really strong also for small scale pvp for their utility/aoe burst. Got major defile aoe, you can wipe a small Group if you time your deep fissure with dawnbreaker and maybe an ally ulti. Permafrost in combo with an ally eye of flame is op. Not talking because i've encountered some of them i talk because i play one of them and i see the difference when i use other classes. Still
hard to play for duels or solo play if u encounter people Who actually can play their class and has a lot of experience. Stronger in no cp pvp, i use to melt a lot of people in bg. Ah was forgetting about the bear, is super bad exept for duels! Damn if Zeni fix it it would be super op in duels.
If your group got wiped by 1 warden with just fissure dawnbreaker.... Then just wow
cpuScientist wrote: »I think those claiming magWarden OP have got to be newer.
They are good in groups for their tree. Honestly the whole entire class is only used because of that damned tree. People claim it's a good tank cause of the tree, claim they are good heals cause of the tree and claim they are op in PvP cause of the tree.
The tree is not gonna be used in trials so they are really only good heals/tank in 4 man's, and in a 4 man if rather the healer use resto ult as it gives a DPS bonus.
In PvP a magicka warden is basically a shotgun, has to load up that 3 second burst. Plenty of time to recover. I played mine extensively and they were crappier sorcs.
But seriously with stamDK, stamBlade, magSorc, heck even MagPlar and stamSorc... People are actually claiming magWarden to be OP over all of these listed a magWarden is the big shot... Just ****ing LOL.
Please bring back the button ZOS
Upgrade warden dps for pve= break the class for pvp.
So yeah..deal with it
Integral1900 wrote: »DocFrost72 wrote: »How does being good in cyro help pve dps?
How does the class lacking in one aspect of the game means that the class is dead ?
Why make a class that only excels at a part of the game that started out as a small niche and remains that way?
cpuScientist wrote: »I think those claiming magWarden OP have got to be newer.
They are good in groups for their tree. Honestly the whole entire class is only used because of that damned tree. People claim it's a good tank cause of the tree, claim they are good heals cause of the tree and claim they are op in PvP cause of the tree.
The tree is not gonna be used in trials so they are really only good heals/tank in 4 man's, and in a 4 man if rather the healer use resto ult as it gives a DPS bonus.
In PvP a magicka warden is basically a shotgun, has to load up that 3 second burst. Plenty of time to recover. I played mine extensively and they were crappier sorcs.
But seriously with stamDK, stamBlade, magSorc, heck even MagPlar and stamSorc... People are actually claiming magWarden to be OP over all of these listed a magWarden is the big shot... Just ****ing LOL.
Please bring back the button ZOS
Is not more op than others, but the shotgun in small scale can be used very well against bows and arrows
Warden needs a buff if u just look the solo play or the duels
Waffennacht wrote: »It plays SO DIFFERENTLY than any other class.
The reason you see so few is because of how most players haven't taken the time to learn it's style
The bear - in duels mainly - can be devastating
Trees is huge obv
It can reliably run SnB over Resto (think about the set access this provides)
I'd run my Warden over my Sorc any day.
Edit: PvP, in PvE you can literally feel the less dps