I am in the same guild, and actually saw you post in guild chat about this last night. I did the same 3 or so weeks ago when the announcement that the fees were increasing. Me and a few others spoke out about it, and soon after the white knights in the guild started defending this.
They claim it is due to increased costs of winning the trader bids in capital cities. The problem I see with that is that I'm in other trading guilds that continue to get a capital city trader at 10k/week, and have less members. I'm leaving after this week. 15k/week is not justifiable, and one the best, long running trading guilds on PS4 NA seems to be doing something a little fishy behind the scenes if you ask me.
jaschacasadiob16_ESO wrote: »What if that Guild that you pay 15K/week loses the trader in the best city? Because you could be right saying you pay for that service. Once that service (top spot) is not provided anymore... refund? I don't think so.
Has anyone here ever been refund by a Guild for losing their trader in the best spot?
I don't like the attitude of charging me for a service:
- You can't guarantee.
- I already pay for with the cut of each thing I sell.
If you want gold do some smart fund raising.
jaschacasadiob16_ESO wrote: »What if that Guild that you pay 15K/week loses the trader in the best city? Because you could be right saying you pay for that service. Once that service (top spot) is not provided anymore... refund? I don't think so.
Has anyone here ever been refund by a Guild for losing their trader in the best spot?
I don't like the attitude of charging me for a service:
- You can't guarantee.
- I already pay for with the cut of each thing I sell.
If you want gold do some smart fund raising.
jaschacasadiob16_ESO wrote: »
I don't like the attitude of charging me for a service:
- You can't guarantee.
- I already pay for with the cut of each thing I sell.
If you want gold do some smart fund raising.
medusasfolly wrote: »
It's very easy for someone to demand smart fund raising if they aren't contributing to the efforts. Smart fundraising takes alot of work and coordination. If you're demanding this, are you also prepared to be part of the solution?
Fallen_Ray wrote: »
datgladiatah wrote: »Yeah I'm in a 4 trade guild collective with stores in the most popular spots (except Rawl'kha) and the worst they do is ask for raffle donations.
Vipstaakki wrote: »A good trading guild never beggars their members. If they ask you to pay a membership fee LEAVE.
sylviermoone wrote: »
That all said, ZOS has made changes that make it MUCH more difficult to maintain transparency to your members. Last year, they removed the ability for any member to see the amount that a guild won their trader bid for from the guild history in a mistaken effort to curtail bid spying. Not only did this NOT solve that issue, it removes a member's ability to see how their contributions are being spent. In addition, the changes coming in Update 15 that will remove the ability for most members to even see the bank balance further destroy transparency. Though I do applaud the fact that ZOS has finally addressed the issue of bid spying, the fact that they have done it in a way that involves hiding the bank balance entirely from all but a select few guild members will only make it more difficult to maintain transparency.
FrancisCrawford wrote: »sylviermoone wrote: »
That all said, ZOS has made changes that make it MUCH more difficult to maintain transparency to your members. Last year, they removed the ability for any member to see the amount that a guild won their trader bid for from the guild history in a mistaken effort to curtail bid spying. Not only did this NOT solve that issue, it removes a member's ability to see how their contributions are being spent. In addition, the changes coming in Update 15 that will remove the ability for most members to even see the bank balance further destroy transparency. Though I do applaud the fact that ZOS has finally addressed the issue of bid spying, the fact that they have done it in a way that involves hiding the bank balance entirely from all but a select few guild members will only make it more difficult to maintain transparency.
Can't you define ranks and set guild permissions to be more transparent than is customary?
i was in one that decided it was too much work to run a trade guild so they stopped doing raffles and such and decided to charge 10k a week or GTFO. I LOLOLOLed and GTFO on my own, but not before invited a slew of people to my other trade guilds that weren't lazy mother ***.