Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Nirnhoned doesn't even come close to Precise.
Based on what? And what do you mean by close? Cause I think anything under 2% is "close".
IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Nirnhoned doesn't even come close to Precise.
Based on what? And what do you mean by close? Cause I think anything under 2% is "close".
9% crit vs 200 weapon/spell damage. Its not that close considering ideally you drop the Thief mundus stone for either Shadow or the Lover.
Isn't sharpened still BiS anyway after the changes?
gethemshauna wrote: »Sharpened still bis in most scenarios.
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Why are you using sharp on s/b anyways? Tanks ought to have infused with the crusher enchant, which got a major buff this patch.
I did a test, Precise is about 10-11% more dps same duration.
Dps with Precise: about 2.8k
Dps with Nirnhoned: about 2.5K
Skills used: light attack and Crushing shock, 5 times rotation.
Weapons used: Maple Inferno staves, Precise & Nirnhoned.
Sets used: None
IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Nirnhoned doesn't even come close to Precise.
Based on what? And what do you mean by close? Cause I think anything under 2% is "close".
9% crit vs 200 weapon/spell damage. Its not that close considering ideally you drop the Thief mundus stone for either Shadow or the Lover.
DMuehlhausen wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »Why are you using sharp on s/b anyways? Tanks ought to have infused with the crusher enchant, which got a major buff this patch.
play the way you want..isn't tank dps too?
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »I did a test, Precise is about 10-11% more dps same duration.
Dps with Precise: about 2.8k
Dps with Nirnhoned: about 2.5K
Skills used: light attack and Crushing shock, 5 times rotation.
Weapons used: Maple Inferno staves, Precise & Nirnhoned.
Sets used: None
Far too low of a parse . You need to get something along the lines of the 6 million dummy at least, preferably the 25 million Centurion.IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Nirnhoned doesn't even come close to Precise.
Based on what? And what do you mean by close? Cause I think anything under 2% is "close".
9% crit vs 200 weapon/spell damage. Its not that close considering ideally you drop the Thief mundus stone for either Shadow or the Lover.
It is at least 240 extra SD/WD, 250 if your group has a Templar.
You realize that they were within .2% of each other, when they were 7% and 219,
Lord_Dexter wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Nirnhoned doesn't even come close to Precise.
Based on what? And what do you mean by close? Cause I think anything under 2% is "close".
Nirn will buff VMA weapons damage greatly so will be BIS for VMA weapons
Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »I did a test, Precise is about 10-11% more dps same duration.
Dps with Precise: about 2.8k
Dps with Nirnhoned: about 2.5K
Skills used: light attack and Crushing shock, 5 times rotation.
Weapons used: Maple Inferno staves, Precise & Nirnhoned.
Sets used: None
Far too low of a parse . You need to get something along the lines of the 6 million dummy at least, preferably the 25 million Centurion.IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Lightspeedflashb14_ESO wrote: »IzakiBrotherSs wrote: »Nirnhoned doesn't even come close to Precise.
Based on what? And what do you mean by close? Cause I think anything under 2% is "close".
9% crit vs 200 weapon/spell damage. Its not that close considering ideally you drop the Thief mundus stone for either Shadow or the Lover.
It is at least 240 extra SD/WD, 250 if your group has a Templar.
You realize that they were within .2% of each other, when they were 7% and 219,
I did the tests 20 times per each staff, then I added up the values and divided them by 20.
Not a single test, but 20 tests, about 500k+ HP each test.