Maintenance for the week of April 6:
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6
• PC/Mac: No maintenance – April 6
Should 2H weapons have trait effectiveness reduced?
Avran_Sylt
✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭
✭✭
Seeing as they are a single item, they should only have the effectiveness of a one handed item trait right? Just like how they only count as one set piece. For consistencies sake I think it should be this way, and hey, 2H might not be the best choice in stam PvP then. 
Edited by Avran_Sylt on June 13, 2017 11:04PM Should 2H weapons have trait effectiveness reduced? 16 votes
The Logic is Sound
6%
1 vote
The Logic is not Sound
68%
11 votes
I Don't Care
0%
Other
25%
4 votes
0
-
GiuEliN0✭✭✭Uhmmm, let me guess, ;D
u are getting killed by 2H users?^^Beta-tester January 2014
PC EU
Most Important Character:
Elsewin, DC, Bosmer Stamblade PVE cp 1100+ Flawless Conqueror
https://signatur.eso-database.com/12343192/signatur.jpg4 -
Aliyavana✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭✭✭✭OtherConsistency isn't always good, just look at the bow HA nerf. 2hs have tradeoffs and access to their own unique skills and so do not need set bonuses. Mag dps do not need more buffs and the only 2h weapons that need to count as 2 set items are bows(which are not a good primary) and ice staves which are worse than sword and boardEdited by Aliyavana on June 13, 2017 11:01PM0 -
Avran_Sylt✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭Consistency isn't always good, just look at the bow HA nerf. 2hs have tradeoffs and access to their own unique skills and so do not need set bonuses. Mag dps do not need more buffs and the only 2h weapons that need to count as 2 set items are bows(which are not a good primary) and ice staves which are worse than sword and board
Problem being: Should Bows be buffed based on the sets available to them? Or should its kit be buffed such that it actually becomes viable? Same goes for the frost staff.Edited by Avran_Sylt on June 13, 2017 11:03PM0 -
scipionumatia✭✭✭✭The Logic is not SoundThis doesn't make any sense, all 2h weapons would be irrelevant then. It's balanced(ish) the way it is now. If you did it your way not only would staff wielding mag classes be at a huge disadvantage but every stam class would use dualwield or shield. By doing so they would get the bonus of another set piece and double traitScipio Numantia Red guard Nightblade PvP- AD
Scipio Asiaticus Khajiit Nightblade (CRAFTER/DPS) PvE- EP
Altmer Nightblade PvP- EP
Fueoculto Breton Templar (DPS) PvE- EP
Rasoculto Orc Dragon Knight PvP- EP
Caethus Argonian Templar (HEAL) PvE- EP
Vale Oso Nord Sorc (DPS) PvE- AD
Sir-Galahad-the-pure Altmer Sorc (DPS) PvE- EP
Scipionumantine Imperial Templar PvP- EP
Un-bearable Imperial Warden PVP- EP
Vale Bear Altmer Warden PvP- EP
Baits-All-Zergs Argonian Dragon knight PVP- DC0 -
Avran_Sylt✭✭✭✭✭
✭✭scipionumatia wrote: »This doesn't make any sense, all 2h weapons would be irrelevant then. It's balanced(ish) the way it is now. If you did it your way not only would staff wielding mag classes be at a huge disadvantage but every stam class would use dualwield or shield. By doing so they would get the bonus of another set piece and double trait
Indeed!0 -
nhisso✭✭✭✭The Logic is not SoundDont even have sarcasm for your idea because it is so ridiculous.0
-
![[Deleted User]](https://us.v-cdn.net/5020507/uploads/06301530861bfae62d56b72eef4ac33d.png)
[Deleted User]Soul ShrivenHello everyone,
Since it was made clear that this thread was only meant to troll a certain topic, we've gone ahead and closed this thread. Please keep in mind that trolling is against the Forum Rules. For further posts please be sure to post your opinion more constructively without the intent of inciting certain forum members.
Thank you for understanding!0
This discussion has been closed.