Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »
Well, in this thread; I'm not going to wade into the AH v Guild Trader argument, nor am I going to engage in any arguments about whether Skill Spamming is "normal" for an MMO or if it's an issue that "isn't supposed to be like that in ESO". (referencing your linked threads, BTW)kunquatb16_ESO wrote: »Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »
I get people have different views, would be boring otherwise. And a lot of negative and positive feedback is aimed at identifying issues and making things better, or praising what is good.
But I don't get how 6 very different idea's for improving something, that is widely seen as a game weakness can be shot down. https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/348710/ideas-to-improve-trade#latest
Or totally ignored, despite solving an increasing issue https://forums.elderscrollsonline.com/en/discussion/346599/an-idea-to-improve-the-game-skill-spamming-solution#latest
I don't know, maybe I should just QQ everything and have 100s agreeing with me.
Any changes in the trader system has been discussed, at length. Final final word from Matt Firor, way back in 2014, "We would have to rebuild the game code to what you want. It is against one of the core development concepts, not marketing concepts when we built the game. So, either we stop development of ESO, shut down the servers and create a new game, or you learn to live with what we have". Why do people find this so hard to believe.
Any changes in the trader system has been discussed, at length. Final final word from Matt Firor, way back in 2014, "We would have to rebuild the game code to what you want. It is against one of the core development concepts, not marketing concepts when we built the game. So, either we stop development of ESO, shut down the servers and create a new game, or you learn to live with what we have". Why do people find this so hard to believe.
Uriel_Nocturne wrote: »Fix'd that for you, because the complete opposite over-generalized exaggeration can just as easily apply to the Forums as your over-generalized exaggeration applies to the Forums.Because it's a game forum where people circle jerk each other about how the game is PERFECT, and if you have a negative opinion of it, you must just have a L2P issue or just outright suck.
KingYogi415 wrote: »I feel obliged to say: spend less time QQ'ing and more time learning to forum.
Cheers!
kunquatb16_ESO wrote: »Why is it that constructive posts putting forwards ideas for improving the game get QQ'ed, often without reason given, and when it is, almost always unrelated to the idea put forwards, or based on them not actually reading the OP?
Where as Troll post, posts that QQ the game ect get wide spread support and agreement, often even if they hold no substance? (Note, I know a lot of complaints are genuine, and helpful in identifying issues)
Why is this good for the game?
Do people not want nice things?
Being a QQ post, this will likely be 10x more popular that all my idea posts combined...
Thealteregoroman wrote: »ok......WHAT THE HECK DOES QQ MEAN?!?!?! I seriously am going cray trying to figure it out with some context clues lol.
tinythinker wrote: »Thealteregoroman wrote: »ok......WHAT THE HECK DOES QQ MEAN?!?!?! I seriously am going cray trying to figure it out with some context clues lol.
OK I'll bite. q.q looks like eyes that are crying.
As for the OP, some constructive criticism threads are called qq and dismissed as whining in addition to general suggestion threads being trolled. Some people are jerks, some have short attention spans and poor reading comprehension.