Reasons? Sure.
1. No lore to back it up.
2. Being a Vampire Warden should be an impossibility
3. Wielding Ice, or any other elemental magic should be a Sorc's gig
4. Green Mushrooms and Bears? Uh...no
I would have had 10x more interest if they had introduced a class like Necromancer, or Lich, or something with far more "Cool" factor.
İ dont Like it CUZ,
*It doesnt have any uniqueness of it self...
*Its all skills are stolen from other classes skill and just changed animations...there is no creativity for it...
*To make The Warden they destroy other classes
*Dont like to see Bear and Mashrooms together!!!
*Warden means GUARDS and i dont thing a guard can protect with mushrooms to anyone:D...
*i just like Colors of skills:D....
MythicEmperor wrote: »Reasons? Sure.
1. No lore to back it up.
2. Being a Vampire Warden should be an impossibility
3. Wielding Ice, or any other elemental magic should be a Sorc's gig
4. Green Mushrooms and Bears? Uh...no
I would have had 10x more interest if they had introduced a class like Necromancer, or Lich, or something with far more "Cool" factor.
While I agree that Necromancers and Liches are far cooler, I must disagree with some of your points.
1. Plenty of lore. Take one step in Valenwood
2. Why? Could I not say the same about Vampire Templars (which would actually make sense)?
3. Tell that to the Dragonknights (who wield fire)
4. a. Mushrooms are awesome.
b. Bears are perfectly reasonable. In Morrowind: Bloodmoon, you are even able to summon one.
Regarding the Warden Lore: en.uesp.net/wiki/Lore:Who_are_the_Wardens_truly%3F
notimetocare wrote: »Reasons? Sure.
1. No lore to back it up.
2. Being a Vampire Warden should be an impossibility
3. Wielding Ice, or any other elemental magic should be a Sorc's gig
4. Green Mushrooms and Bears? Uh...no
I would have had 10x more interest if they had introduced a class like Necromancer, or Lich, or something with far more "Cool" factor.
1. Says who? Last I checked ZoS writes ESO lore, and none of the Warden breaks established lore.
2. Says who? One does not lose their magical knowledge upon affliction, death, and undeath.
3. Uh, no? After claiming Warden is against lore you point out that you onow little about lore.
4. Care to expand with actually reasoning?
A Lich would be hunted and killed by everyone and their mother, as would a necromancer. Or did you forget the lore in ESO has Necromancy as an absolute enemy?
Tommy_The_Gun wrote: »So um... let me put it this way...
You have a class that has stamina based healing and a lot of pets that can take aggro from mobs...
You will be probably able to solo most of the content of this game (yes even some group content)....
Furthermore - Warden has almost no problems with recurses management.
It is the same case as with sorcerer - class is "too good" when compared to others.
Do I like it ? Yes... I think I do. Even if warden was a total garbage and worst class in eso I would still probably pick it for my main character (that is if this class was available back in 2014 when I started playing eso).
The only thing I don't like is lack of class balance in eso.
I think they're afraid of making any paid class too powerful, for fear that people will start screaming "Pay to win!!!" So pretty much any new class that comes out will be underpowered unless they offer it to everyone free via a patch.MLGProPlayer wrote: »Warden DPS was absolutely abysmal on the PTS. Getting through vMA was extremely difficult due to low DPS (so much for being able to solo content). They were the worst DPS class by far. ZOS addressed some of their passives on Monday, but I haven't reached 50 yet to test.
When it comes to healing and tanking, they simply aren't as good as templar and DK.
Reasons? Sure.
1. No lore to back it up.
2. Being a Vampire Warden should be an impossibility
3. Wielding Ice, or any other elemental magic should be a Sorc's gig
4. Green Mushrooms and Bears? Uh...no
I would have had 10x more interest if they had introduced a class like Necromancer, or Lich, or something with far more "Cool" factor.