Kiralyn2000 wrote: »re: "bad customer service"
If it were a case of "oops, I clicked the wrong button", I could see a case for this. But the OP says they "recently" made the change, but only reconsidered after seeing patch notes/comments about the upcoming rebalance.
That doesn't sound like a mistake, and it doesn't sound like he asked for the "fix" right away. "Sorry, I decided that I didn't like it after all" isn't a strong justification for asking something be changed.
Bonzodog01 wrote: »Is the min/max perspective that important?
The differences of using a non-optimal class are only 1-2%.
In fact, just because I have always wanted, and well, screw meta, I am building a Magicka Templar Orc. She is so far surprisingly good. Her Health bonuses make her stronger than your average Magicka Templar.
All in all, racial passives make very little overall difference to a character.
No, I don't believe it's huge. Even with your 40k magicka draw of 10% for a total of 44k, this isn't a significant change overall.Now I have 0 previous MMO experience but...10% isn't huge?
DMuehlhausen wrote: »How much is the race change? Just buy another. I can't imagine it's over $20-$25 is it?
I believe it's 3000 crowns? So year around 20$.
It's nothing would or should do. You wanted to make the change, you paid for it, you know don't like the results. It's not their fault.
What you should have done was create a new toon (if you have a slot) made it reguard. Done Dolmen groups to get to 50 in a very short time. Put in your CP, and given your gear from your Argonian over to this toon and tested. If you didn't like delete the character.
Bonzodog01 wrote: »Is the min/max perspective that important?
The differences of using a non-optimal class are only 1-2%.
In fact, just because I have always wanted, and well, screw meta, I am building a Magicka Templar Orc. She is so far surprisingly good. Her Health bonuses make her stronger than your average Magicka Templar.
All in all, racial passives make very little overall difference to a character.
Blacksmoke wrote: »And ZoS would revert this back because....?
Bonzodog01 wrote: »Is the min/max perspective that important?
The differences of using a non-optimal class are only 1-2%.
In fact, just because I have always wanted, and well, screw meta, I am building a Magicka Templar Orc. She is so far surprisingly good. Her Health bonuses make her stronger than your average Magicka Templar.
All in all, racial passives make very little overall difference to a character.
Bonzodog01 wrote: »Is the min/max perspective that important?
drakhan2002_ESO wrote: »drakhan2002_ESO wrote: »
Only because the Hist wanted it. It was probably to toughen us up to thrive for future crises (we whooped the Mehrunes Dagon) and it was a lesson we had to learn.
I thought the Hist was a "large Argonian dung heap"...
you know how many time I've wanted to kill that Nord -.- cant though...
DMuehlhausen wrote: »Bonzodog01 wrote: »Is the min/max perspective that important?
The differences of using a non-optimal class are only 1-2%.
In fact, just because I have always wanted, and well, screw meta, I am building a Magicka Templar Orc. She is so far surprisingly good. Her Health bonuses make her stronger than your average Magicka Templar.
All in all, racial passives make very little overall difference to a character.
To answer you first question...yes it is to some people. I've had people kicked from vet Dungeons because they were a Nord Sorc or an Argonian anything. It's really stupid.
10% is not "huge" in any capacity, let alone MMO calculations.subtlezeroub17_ESO wrote: »Some races legit have a nine to ten percent advantage to their resources. That's...HUGE on an mmo and tbh really shouldn't exist in the first place.
No, I don't believe it's huge. Even with your 40k magicka draw of 10% for a total of 44k, this isn't a significant change overall.Now I have 0 previous MMO experience but...10% isn't huge?
I play a Bosmer who has over 40k base stamina. My passive gives me a 21% regen (which I'll round down) for around 8k regen per 2 seconds. At least, that's how I should "see" it in game.
I never see this. The most expensive skill I cast costs me 2800k (cast reduction glyphs). Even if I fire this off twice within 2 seconds, that's only 5.6k. Clearly I should have infinite stamina.
I don't. Neither do magSorcs with 40k+ magicka.
Either the 10% is based on the attribute stamina pool (which I think is about 32k without buffs?), giving me only 3.2k or the game's math is broken.
There are several videos on YT you can check out to see how this "10%" translates in terms of damage. It's not as huge as some make it out to be.
The OP is not asking for a refund. He only wants ZOS to restore his argonian look. Hope they do if they feel generous not *cough* greedy *cough*.
Wolfenbelle wrote: »Unless I'm missing something, I don't see why Redguard would not be viable when Morrowind goes live. I've tested a Redguard stamina Templar on PTS and had no issues due to race.
It just amazes me, whatever happened to, "personal responsibility"?!? The OP made a CHOICE in a race decision, and now believes, without even trying the changes, that they made a mistake based on 'patch notes'... I have no sympathy here. A CHOICE was made, and people need to learn to live with their decisions and accept responsibility for them... not turning it into ZOS' responsibility for their decision. I've made many 'mistakes' in decisions in ESO, but I've NEVER ONCE thought about contacting customer support for them to rectify my own mistake. I made the decision, I lived with that decision... more people in this world need to grasp that concept and stop blaming someone else for their decisions.