FLuFFyxMuFFiN wrote: »
notimetocare wrote: »kyle.wilson wrote: »ashenb14_ESO wrote: »...you childish zos fanboi.
could you show me a single case of people being sued for talking about a game beta on voice chat..please. im sure you can...im sure zos monitors voice servers hosted by other companies/entities...right?
I'm not a fan boi, quite far from it. I've had mods threaten to ban my forum account many times for things I've said about ZeniMax.
As for being sued. ZeniMax has proven they will sue, and sue hard if you violate their NDA.
http://www.theverge.com/2017/2/1/14442212/facebook-oculus-zenimax-vr-lawsuit-verdict-palmer-luckey
Out of the $500 miliion Occulus has to pay, $200 mil was for the NDA violation.
But in the end, its a CYA.
Suing the creators of Occulus for millions isn't the same as suing an individual for an amount that you will never ever see because his earning potential isn't very high...be lucky to get your court and attorney fees back from him before he dies if he pays the absolute minimum.
That doesn't mean it's not a possibility.
Likely, no. Possible, yes.
They're more likely to threaten to sue than actually do it... but IIRC, the original launch beta consequences were booting from beta.
NDA is much more intended to block major publication of info. At worst a player would see account ban and possibly a small civil suit. NDA is a fear tactic
It's under NDA so they can protect their story and content. Otherwise people would get spoilers/free content.AzraelKrieg wrote: »Not ZOS's fault. Sounds like crappy humans to me. But they should have created a new channel instead of kicking you out
It's ZOS's fault for making it a closed beta instead of an open one and imposing an NDA. Now those of us who didn't get an invite are now persona non grata, even in our own guilds.
notimetocare wrote: »kyle.wilson wrote: »ashenb14_ESO wrote: »...you childish zos fanboi.
could you show me a single case of people being sued for talking about a game beta on voice chat..please. im sure you can...im sure zos monitors voice servers hosted by other companies/entities...right?
I'm not a fan boi, quite far from it. I've had mods threaten to ban my forum account many times for things I've said about ZeniMax.
As for being sued. ZeniMax has proven they will sue, and sue hard if you violate their NDA.
http://www.theverge.com/2017/2/1/14442212/facebook-oculus-zenimax-vr-lawsuit-verdict-palmer-luckey
Out of the $500 miliion Occulus has to pay, $200 mil was for the NDA violation.
But in the end, its a CYA.
Suing the creators of Occulus for millions isn't the same as suing an individual for an amount that you will never ever see because his earning potential isn't very high...be lucky to get your court and attorney fees back from him before he dies if he pays the absolute minimum.
That doesn't mean it's not a possibility.
Likely, no. Possible, yes.
They're more likely to threaten to sue than actually do it... but IIRC, the original launch beta consequences were booting from beta.
NDA is much more intended to block major publication of info. At worst a player would see account ban and possibly a small civil suit. NDA is a fear tactic
A small civil suit can still wreck your average player, depending on how much you're stuck paying.
notimetocare wrote: »notimetocare wrote: »kyle.wilson wrote: »ashenb14_ESO wrote: »...you childish zos fanboi.
could you show me a single case of people being sued for talking about a game beta on voice chat..please. im sure you can...im sure zos monitors voice servers hosted by other companies/entities...right?
I'm not a fan boi, quite far from it. I've had mods threaten to ban my forum account many times for things I've said about ZeniMax.
As for being sued. ZeniMax has proven they will sue, and sue hard if you violate their NDA.
http://www.theverge.com/2017/2/1/14442212/facebook-oculus-zenimax-vr-lawsuit-verdict-palmer-luckey
Out of the $500 miliion Occulus has to pay, $200 mil was for the NDA violation.
But in the end, its a CYA.
Suing the creators of Occulus for millions isn't the same as suing an individual for an amount that you will never ever see because his earning potential isn't very high...be lucky to get your court and attorney fees back from him before he dies if he pays the absolute minimum.
That doesn't mean it's not a possibility.
Likely, no. Possible, yes.
They're more likely to threaten to sue than actually do it... but IIRC, the original launch beta consequences were booting from beta.
NDA is much more intended to block major publication of info. At worst a player would see account ban and possibly a small civil suit. NDA is a fear tactic
A small civil suit can still wreck your average player, depending on how much you're stuck paying.
I say small because they would aim to settle on what can be handled. Less hassle, less court fee
SquareSausage wrote: »Pallmor I am sorry that we had to kick you, but you must understand we are not allowed to tell anyone about what we experience on the Beta server.
Once all Beta testing is complete we will re-invite you, but you must also resubmit a guild application.
Thanks
pugyourself wrote: »AzraelKrieg wrote: »Not ZOS's fault. Sounds like crappy humans to me. But they should have created a new channel instead of kicking you out
It's ZOS's fault for making it a closed beta instead of an open one and imposing an NDA. Now those of us who didn't get an invite are now persona non grata, even in our own guilds.
I'd find a new guild. They sound like jerks TBH.
Maybe his guild was one of the top guilds in ESO. With a 6 month waiting list.
notimetocare wrote: »NDA is a fear tactic
Publius_Scipio wrote: »You'll be better off without them.
I've been in that guild since 2014. They're my friends. Now they're scared ZOS is going to pull their ESO accounts if they even mention the beta around me.
They're breaking the NDA themselves.
SquareSausage wrote: »Pallmor I am sorry that we had to kick you, but you must understand we are not allowed to tell anyone about what we experience on the Beta server.
Once all Beta testing is complete we will re-invite you, but you must also resubmit a guild application.
Thanks
@WalksonGraves It actually does. One of the things you agree to when signing the NDA is not discussing the things covered by the NDA on any forum or chat room outside of the official beta forums. By discussing the beta on Teamspeak, private or otherwise, they are violating the NDA.WalksonGraves wrote: »Nda does not stop anyone who signed from talking about it with other the testers. That would be ridiculous.I was under the impression that an NDA meant they shouldn't be discussing it at all...including with each other. Your guild should not have kicked you because they weren't supposed to even mention getting an invite. I'm sorry that happened to you @Pallmor.
@WalksonGraves It actually does. One of the things you agree to when signing the NDA is not discussing the things covered by the NDA on any forum or chat room outside of the official beta forums. By discussing the beta on Teamspeak, private or otherwise, they are violating the NDA.WalksonGraves wrote: »Nda does not stop anyone who signed from talking about it with other the testers. That would be ridiculous.I was under the impression that an NDA meant they shouldn't be discussing it at all...including with each other. Your guild should not have kicked you because they weren't supposed to even mention getting an invite. I'm sorry that happened to you @Pallmor.