brimstone74 wrote: »It's not worth the risk. I would say this is getting better as Baby Boomers (no offense guys) and some of their biases are organically kinda retiring themselves out of the workforce. Gen X forward you'll see a lot less bias, but it's still there.
I once had a boomer see an mmo referenced in a private email on my personal cell to me from a friend...he called me out...he was in the process of pulling me to his team and promoting me....that email killed the whole thing.
To a lot of folks...gamer = lazy loser.
We know better as far as Guild Leaders and Competitive gaming...but the masses at large do not really buy into this.
The sad thing is if that email was regarding a baseball meet up after work...I likely would have gotten a high five.
brimstone74 wrote: »It's not worth the risk. I would say this is getting better as Baby Boomers (no offense guys) and some of their biases are organically kinda retiring themselves out of the workforce. Gen X forward you'll see a lot less bias, but it's still there.
I once had a boomer see an mmo referenced in a private email on my personal cell to me from a friend...he called me out...he was in the process of pulling me to his team and promoting me....that email killed the whole thing.
To a lot of folks...gamer = lazy loser.
We know better as far as Guild Leaders and Competitive gaming...but the masses at large do not really buy into this.
The sad thing is if that email was regarding a baseball meet up after work...I likely would have gotten a high five.
brimstone74 wrote: »It's not worth the risk. I would say this is getting better as Baby Boomers (no offense guys) and some of their biases are organically kinda retiring themselves out of the workforce. Gen X forward you'll see a lot less bias, but it's still there.
I once had a boomer see an mmo referenced in a private email on my personal cell to me from a friend...he called me out...he was in the process of pulling me to his team and promoting me....that email killed the whole thing.
To a lot of folks...gamer = lazy loser.
We know better as far as Guild Leaders and Competitive gaming...but the masses at large do not really buy into this.
The sad thing is if that email was regarding a baseball meet up after work...I likely would have gotten a high five.
Isn't that technically discrimination? Sure 'gamer' isn't a typical issue for discrimination but I know one woman who was formally warned about referring to applicants under 30 as "kids", "young lads", "wee boys" and other things that implied they were children because it could be considered discrimination and if someone found out and then didn't get the job they could complain on the basis that she was making assumptions about their experience based on their age.
(Although it might also depend on what country you're in. I know UK employment law is very different to the US - for example the whole 'at will' employment thing is totally illegal here.)
But I think you're right about older co-workers. Funny enough one of my co-workers made some snarky comment about applicants with tattoos earlier today and how it makes them look like "god awful punk rockers". She seemed to forget that she was speaking to me and my manager and we both have tattoos which are visible depending on how long our sleeves are (today we both had them on show), but I gently reminded her that I'd just been chatting to the head of department about which Guns N' Roses shows we were each going to this summer. She quickly back-tracked and claimed that it's different if you can "pass for normal".
jakeedmundson wrote: »brimstone74 wrote: »It's not worth the risk. I would say this is getting better as Baby Boomers (no offense guys) and some of their biases are organically kinda retiring themselves out of the workforce. Gen X forward you'll see a lot less bias, but it's still there.
I once had a boomer see an mmo referenced in a private email on my personal cell to me from a friend...he called me out...he was in the process of pulling me to his team and promoting me....that email killed the whole thing.
To a lot of folks...gamer = lazy loser.
We know better as far as Guild Leaders and Competitive gaming...but the masses at large do not really buy into this.
The sad thing is if that email was regarding a baseball meet up after work...I likely would have gotten a high five.
I'm not a baby boomer...
I don't think gamer = lazy loser... i game and i get $417 done.
The point is that putting something like this on a resume plainly spells out something about that applicant... His/her priorities could be mixed up. That means it's a potential risk factor to me as an employer.
Family > Work/School > Personal time.
Putting this type of info on a resume tells me that the applicants personal time could EASILY interfere with work. (Late, Calling in, distracted, etc.)
For 99% of all hiring for businesses, the resume is the first impression. Be formal and direct... once you get an interview, then show your personality and make yourself memorable.
Oh I'd love to see this interview.
"And what are your qualifications?"
"Well, ma'am, I've played Elder Scrolls Online for three years and was the leader of my raid guild. So, you know, I have a lot of management experience dealing with egos and payouts and whatnot."
"Get out."
My Ops Manager told me that GM was worth putting on a resume. and this is a company that is worth 48 billion USD.
I truly believe that the work involved in running a medium to large guild does in fact deserve some mention in an interview. case in point:
Alchemical wrote: »My Ops Manager told me that GM was worth putting on a resume. and this is a company that is worth 48 billion USD.
I truly believe that the work involved in running a medium to large guild does in fact deserve some mention in an interview. case in point:
This image has the right idea. Besides, putting 'guild leader' or 'dungeon master' is not necessarily good experience unless you've actually learned something from it. If you have the skills of a good leader, list those, no need to go into detail about how or where you developed them.
Hiring managers should note that, while they are evaluating and interviewing an applicant, the applicant is doing the exact same thing to them.
I think it's ballsy, but also a brilliant way for an applicant to "feel out" the culture of the organization they're interested in working for.
Sallington wrote: »Alchemical wrote: »My Ops Manager told me that GM was worth putting on a resume. and this is a company that is worth 48 billion USD.
I truly believe that the work involved in running a medium to large guild does in fact deserve some mention in an interview. case in point:
This image has the right idea. Besides, putting 'guild leader' or 'dungeon master' is not necessarily good experience unless you've actually learned something from it. If you have the skills of a good leader, list those, no need to go into detail about how or where you developed them.
And cross your fingers hoping they don't ask where you learned those skills, or to talk about an example of when you used those skills...
"Well we were in progression run of vMoL in Elder Scrolls Online"
"NEXT!"
Sounds like they did you a favor.brimstone74 wrote: »It's not worth the risk. I would say this is getting better as Baby Boomers (no offense guys) and some of their biases are organically kinda retiring themselves out of the workforce. Gen X forward you'll see a lot less bias, but it's still there.
I once had a boomer see an mmo referenced in a private email on my personal cell to me from a friend...he called me out...he was in the process of pulling me to his team and promoting me....that email killed the whole thing.
To a lot of folks...gamer = lazy loser.
We know better as far as Guild Leaders and Competitive gaming...but the masses at large do not really buy into this.
The sad thing is if that email was regarding a baseball meet up after work...I likely would have gotten a high five.
GwJSVDShark wrote: »Hiring managers should note that, while they are evaluating and interviewing an applicant, the applicant is doing the exact same thing to them.
I think it's ballsy, but also a brilliant way for an applicant to "feel out" the culture of the organization they're interested in working for.
I read this and laugh.
Ok, so you can evaluate and 'feel out' the 'culture' and so on, but kind reminder, you're the one asking me for a job. So evaluate all you want and what have you, if you walked in my door was to get a job, not to tell me how we do not conform to your points of view. Translation: thank you for your time, we're still in the interviewing process, we'll be in touch. NEXT
...and you're the one asking for applicants. By eliminating someone based on their interests, you could well be missing an opportunity to bring someone creative onto your team.GwJSVDShark wrote: »..you're the one asking me for a job...
WalksonGraves wrote: »I'd put ESO as a reference if I applied as inventory management specialist.
For some people that might not be a problem, but I can imagine it catching people out - especially coming from me when I'm dressing up all professional like someone who actually belongs on the interviewer side of the table.
WalksonGraves wrote: »I'd put ESO as a reference if I applied as inventory management specialist.